Channel
@roboivan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
242subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001658143710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roboivan |
| Description | Делаем в России лучшую защиту для роботов от вредных воздействий, внеряем роботов в агрессивные среды, где ранее они не могли работать, роботизируем операции перекладки продукции в любых условиях. Связь со мной - @p01ubkov 🌐 - www.aprom.tech |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roboivan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 242 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 242 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (20 November 2025 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 86 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 32.3% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 16.1% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 16.1% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjex8cBq | 1 | 15 December 2025 | 15 December 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 29 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Наткнулся на объявление: крупный завод распродаёт свои б/у сварочные роботы, Немецкие, довольно редкие и вряд ли дешевые. Гляньте на фото выше — стоят, бедолаги) Внутри, может, ещё живые, а вид такой, будто десять лет варили без выходных: копоть, брызги, облезлая краска. Как вам их товарный вид, купили бы такого себе ? И вот о чём подумалось. Сварочный чехол на фоне самого робота стоит копейки. Да и на фоне всего ос…
👍5🤗2
Поспорили немножечко со Skolkovo Leaks. Как думаете, оправдано ли уже везде где возможно внедрять отечественные манипуляторы ? Я действительно рад что вокруг появилось столько отечественных разработок и многие весьма хорошие, а остальные имеют все шансы в скором времени таковыми стать. Но где та грань сейчас, когда вместо импортного можно поставить своё и что бы вы поставили ?)
⬆️ Яндекс показал всем Роборуку, оказалось, это - KUKA. На заводе Яндекс Лавки в Петербурге поставили робота-манипулятора: он перекладывает лотки с готовой едой в транспортные ящики и, по данным компании, делает это на 30% быстрее живых людей. Всё красиво: холодный цех, вакуумный захват, автоматизация, 85 тыс. порций в день и рост GMV готовой еды на 37% год к году. Освободившийся персонал из числа людей можно занят…
❤1🎉1
#нампишут: Иван Полубков, подписчик Skolkovo Leaks. Вот, как г-н Полубков кратко рассказывает о себе в соцсетях: Более 8 лет в области промышленной автоматизации и робототехники. Основатель «АПРОМТЕХ». О гениальном пРОСТо - рассказываю как улучшить качество работы и жизни с помощью высоких технологий. Иван страстно откликнулся на предыдущий пост о роборуке Яндекса, раскрывая действительно важные подробности в своём …
Интересное наблюдение. Я недавно заметил что у меня очень кринжовая ава была (по нынешним меркам, как мне показалось), которую я по-быстрому сгенерил 3 года назад, чтобы канал начать вести. Это где ИИ генерировал тебе аватар рисованный по твоим фото. И в 2022-23 это казалось очень технологично и ново. Я даже уже не помню как эта программа называлась. Призма вроде? А сейчас уже как будто нигде не встретишь такое и это…
👍3🔥3🤔2❤1🤗1
Channel photo updated
Новость №2. В эту пятницу вечером товарищи из Сбера собирают у себя небольшую закрытую робопати. Будем разговаривать про роботов, ИИ, новые технологии и все такое. Я тоже буду. Если мы знакомы и тоже хотите придти напишите мне в лс или Ксении @ksenia_jaja
❤5👍1
На этой неделе проходит ИННОПРОМ. Я в этом году в опять не поехал — летом почему то всегда образуется много работы. Да и из знакомых, по моим наблюдениям, в этом году мало кто поехал. Зато вспоминаю майскую Металлообработку в Крокусе. Мне в Крокусе вообще ни одна выставка раньше не нравилась, а тут — пожалуй впервые за последние года 4 московская выставка реально порадовала: живая динамика, интересные стенды, и глав…
Вчера увидел Роботакси от Яндекса. Как ни пытался его найти и заказать - пока не получилось (хотя на машине написано что уже доступно). Немного поузнавал, говорят это тестовые обкатки сейчас и в скором времени его запустят 🔥
Российские защитные чехлы для роботов: как АПРОМТЕХ закрывает критичные технологические ниши Национальная ассоциация участников рынка робототехники (НАУРР) продолжает поддерживать российских производителей, которые закрывают критически важные ниши в инфраструктуре роботизированных производств. Сегодня рассказываем о нашем давнем партнёре - компании АПРОМТЕХ, одно из направлений деятельности которой – российское прои…
🔥1
Тут коллеги из "Неискусственная экономика" пишут: Кроме «танцев» мы Грина в действии не видели. Из зала, действительно, не всё видно. В кулуарах мероприятия нам удалось вживую пообщаться с роботом Грином и понаблюдать, как он общается с людьми. Стоит Грин на своих двоих и ходит - вполне уверенно. Вес робота - 80 кг, в реальности он напоминает весьма атлетичного мужчину ростом 185 см. Движения на удивление плавные…
🤗2👍1🔥1😡1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @roboivan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИИван Полубков и Роботы 🤖” (@roboivan), 242 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roboivan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.