Channel
@robimgood2024
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002012289118 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @robimgood2024 |
| Description | Беларуский урбан-проект. Делаем города комфортными вместе с вами! robimgood.org ~ как реализовать городскую идею, заявки для консультаций и карта инициатив. Для обратной связи пишите сюда: @Robimgoodmoderator 😉 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/robimgood2024 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 28 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 29 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 27 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
29 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 48.3% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 34.5% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2024 to 15 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Будет правильным сообщить: мы ставим на паузу наш проект. Уже продолжительное время мы не ведем активности в наших социальных сетях и мессенджерах. #урбаннавіны Что вы можете сделать? ▪️Подписаться на наши дружественные проекты. Просто загляните в наши подписки в социальных сетях и поддержите инициативы. ▪️Можно использовать наш сайт и социальные сети как урбанистический гайд по Беларуси. Кажется, за почти 4 года …
❤7
В Минске на месте Дримлэнда построят музей. Попросили специалиста оценить концепцию #урбаннавіны Скажем прямо – концепция музея нам вообще не зашла. А тебе как? Поделись в комментах.
👍2🤮1
Был ли урбан на беларуских островах? #урбанцікавосткі Урбан – городской! Рассказываем про историю (около)городской инфраструктуры на беларуских островах. Наш список неполный! Если тебе интересно, пиши в комментах, и мы продолжим серию.
👍2❤1
Что такое право на город? И как оно реализуется в Беларуси? #урбансмарт ▪️ Кто придумал концепцию «Право на город»? Французский социолог Анри Лефевр. Он считал, что бизнес и власти планируют нужный им город, но никак не город для средних горожан(ок). ▪️ Почему неучастие в планировке не гуд? Согласно Лефевру, таким образом городские комьюнити отчуждаются от урбан-среды. Город становится антиместом, где реализовать…
👍2❤1
Напоминалка! Робім Гуд разруливает твои урбан-вопросы в чате или напрямую через модератора в TG #урбансмарт Вот тебе пример: не знаешь, как запустить капитальный ремонт многоквартирника, – пиши нам и мы подскажем. Зря что ли у нас в тиме специалист(ки) по праву и урбанистике?! За почти 3 года с небольшими перерывами Робім Гуд помог десяткам горожан(ок) с пошаговыми инструкциями и шаблонами обращений в госорганы. Нам…
❤2👍2🐳1
Местный референдум в Беларуси. Кажется, пора закрывать тему? #урбансмарт Ты что-нибудь слышал(а) про местные референдумы в Беларуси? А в Швейцарии? Именно. Когда речь идёт про прямую демократию, то, скорее всего, это Швейцария. Один из видов референдумов там – это народная инициатива. Например, чтобы запустить всеобщее голосование, нужно собрать 100 тыс. подписей. За всю историю Швейцарии насчитывается около 446 н…
❤2🐳1👍1🤔1
Гайд по беларуским туалетам. Часть вторая #урбанцікавосткі Продолжаем составлять чек-лист беларуских туалетов с репутацией. Вообще мы считаем, что нам досталось так себе наследие от БССР. Туалетов тогда не хватало, их техническое оснащение было минимальным (иногда можно было встретить не-сушилки для рук Vejelis), часть WC была платной, не было тёплой воды, туалетной бумаги, норм унитазов (вместо чаши Генуя) и перего…
❤1👍1🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @robimgood2024. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 660,271 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Робім Гуд” (@robimgood2024), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robimgood2024.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.