Channel
@robertcibis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,427subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001370649600 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @robertcibis |
| Created | 15 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/robertcibis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,427 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,426 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 1,426 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
199 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 125 | 62.8% | |
| ❤ | 45 | 22.6% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 7.04% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 5.03% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/Geopolitics_Emp/status/2045704111534866902?s=20 "How can you explain power, how power works, if you leave [aside] the pure fact that some private people have the exclusive right to create money and others don't? And nearly nobody is aware of this. And these private people, these people, lend it out to others, you know, give it for rent. And they get an interest. By definition, these people one day will…
👍5
Von Massnahmentreue bis zum Kriegsgehorsam. Die Plutokraten-hörigen Regierungen zwingen Ukrainer, Russen und bald ganz Europa zum morden und sich ermorden lassen. Niemand hat mehr Freiheitsverlust als ein folgsamer Soldat. Aber ja, "er kämpft für die Freiheit". Brainfuck...
👍12❤1🔥1
I MUST CREATE A SYSTEM OR BE ENSLAVED BY ANOTHER MAN’S. I WILL NOT REASON OR COMPARE, MY JOB IS TO CREATE. William Blake Wir haben keine Wahl. Wenn wir keine Verantwortung für unser Leben übernehmen, verlieren wir es.
❤7👍3👏1
https://thedanishillusion.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmich-a-fraud-jerm-warfare
🔥2
Aufarbeitung und Aufklärung muss auch bei den "alternativen Stimmen" stattfinden. Dazu ist in letzter Zeit viel passiert. Hier wichtige Hinweise: Auf Telegram OVALmedia ist ein mein Interview mit Transition News verlinkt, in dem ich methodisch eine Verbindung von Agententätigkeiten zwischen Aktivisten in den neuen Medien, Oppositionspolitikern und der ehemaligen Bundeskanzlerin herstelle. David A. Hughes richtet sic…
❤8
⚖️ Strafanzeigen-Aktion: 88 26 & die Chargen im Fokus 💉 Im Interview mit **Rechtsanwalt Tobias Ulbrich erklärt die juristischen Hintergründe unserer Aktion . Es geht um die rechtliche Aufarbeitung und die Forderung nach Transparenz für diese drei spezifischen Chargen: * 🚨 EX8679 * 🚨 FD7958 * 🚨 FE6975 Unter dem Aktenzeichen 88 26 bündeln wir unsere Bemühungen, um Licht in die Unklarheiten zu bringen. 🔍🏛️ Warum wir …
👍8
Die verschwörungsoffene Stimmung in den USA und auch in Europa ist faszinierend: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/56-americans-now-suspect-covid-19-vaccines-caused-mass-deaths Der Damm ist gebrochen: Die Plutokraten brauchen jetzt viel Ablenkung und "alternative Verschwörungen"... Erst Laborvirus-Hysterie (die Schergen Wiesendanger und Co bedienen das Narrativ), dann Epstein, nun kann Bill Gates nun wohl geopfert …
🙏10👍2❤1
Dieser Artikel schlägt weiter Wellen... Jetzt wurde ich von der neuen australischen Plattform TWT interviewt: Siehe hier! Thema "Stille Unruhestifter alternativer und unabhängiger Medien" (Silent Disruptors of Alternative & Independent Media)...
🔥6
Ich habe zu einem neuen Artikel auf Substack mit moderner Technik ein Erklärvideo erstellt. Was halten Sie davon? Bei der Gelegenheit: Bitte abonnieren Sie mich auf Substack, in der Hoffnung, dass diese Plattform nie zensieren wird!
👍8
Posted without readable text
Ich bin stolz einer der Erst-Unterzeichner des Protests gegen die skandalösen Sanktionen gegen Oberst Jacques Baud zu sein. Der Ministerrat der EU zerstört mit willkürlichen Strafmaßnahmen gegen Jacques Baud und insgesamt gegen 59 Journalisten und Wissenschaftler die Grundlagen der Meinungsfreiheit. Diese Sanktionen sind illegal und völkerrechtswidrig, denn sie wurden nicht durch den UN-Sicherheitsrat verhängt. Das…
👍11❤3👏3
https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/michael-andrick-kinder-papa-muss-weiterschreiben-li.10010577
👍12❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @robertcibis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 364,495 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Robert Cibis” (@robertcibis), 1,427 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robertcibis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.