Channel
@rndcore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002638474499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rndcore |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rndcore |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 47 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 47 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 40 | 37.0% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 31.5% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 16.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 5.56% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В этом году участвовал во ВсОШ по ИИ — новом профиле информатики Региональный этап состоял из двух частей: теоретической и практической. В теоретической были задачи по олимпиадной математике разной сложности. В практической — работа с данными: pandas, кластеризация, обучение моделей регрессии и классификации. В итоге стал призёром региона и прошёл на заключительный этап. Для всех, кто прошёл дальше, Центральный Уни…
❤12🔥8🤗3❤🔥1
😄 На днях прошла конференция AI Journey, в рамках которой состоялся AI Challenge. В финал конкурса, к сожалению, мы не прошли, но считаю, что выступили неплохо. По сложившейся традиции организаторы не предоставили разбалловку, а итоговый список финалистов сформировали только после третьего пересчёта — в него попали целых шесть команд, хотя по правилам должно было быть всего три. ➡️ Теперь о самой конференции. В это…
❤5🔥5❤🔥2
⚡️ Спустя четыре месяца усердной работы вместе с @rndlabs мы вышли в полуфинал AI Challenge от Сбера! В этом году наша команда решает задачу минимизации энергии кристаллических решёток с помощью обучения с подкреплением (RL). Не обошлось без сюрпризов: в опубликованной таблице полуфиналистов одна из команд оказалась продублирована, а несколько участников из топа — включая нас — отсутствовали. После обращения к орга…
🍾6👍4❤3🔥3❤🔥1
🏦 В понедельник у всех аудиокоманд прошёл корпоратив. Всё началось в офисе Сбера, где к нашему приезду уже были готовы закуски и напитки. После небольшой паузы мы прослушали доклады тимлидов — они рассказали о своих командах, текущих проектах и планах на будущее. Спустя два часа выступлений почти в полном составе мы отправились в ресторан, где снова отлично пообщались. Наконец-то удалось познакомиться с коллегами ли…
🔥9❤5👍4
Поздравляю всех с 1 сентября!
❤3❤🔥3👍2
🏦 Этим летом у меня появилась возможность пройти стажировку в Сбере. Всё началось ещё в феврале, когда финалистам AI Challenge разослали приглашения на оплачиваемую стажировку. В мае связался с HR, а уже в конце июня я вышел в штат. ➡️ Первым этапом был буткэмп — программа адаптации новых сотрудников. По его завершении нам подарили фирменный рюкзак и футболку. ➡️ После этого я приступил к работе в команде шумоподав…
🔥7❤6👍5
На прошлой неделе OpenAI выпустила две опенсорс-модели под названием gpt-oss. Первая модель имеет 117 млрд параметров, из которых 5,1 млрд — активные. Вторая — 20 млрд параметров, из которых активных 3,6 млрд. Интересный факт: модель с 20 млрд параметров помещается в 16 ГБ памяти, что позволяет запускать её локально. Обе модели относятся к классу reasoners и могут работать в трёх разных режимах «бюджета» рассуждени…
🔥8👍3
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @rndcore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 895,476 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Старт в R&D” (@rndcore), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rndcore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.