BREAKING: $100,000 Bitcoin

Channel
Rocket Launcher Call
@rkcall99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,413subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001679678737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rkcall99 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rkcall99 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 4,413 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 4,416 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 4,418 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
same dev chillguy. still gamble manage your risk always take initials. Let's go! 22k mcap right now! https://pump.fun/coin/HhCh7hgwX6f718imBDGAVsMqPCzh6eFF3FUhzafEpump
STILL GAMBLE! 18k mcap https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aZtv9qZhJA 8ChQXXdUpvS2JMA5EPkS2RvEByaagBehJQSsG8Kcpump
🚀 MrOwl reached 36.60X after @Private_Meta 's call 🚀 🔗 View call 📈 DexView
From 17k to 200k 🚀📈
almost x5 since i called it here 📈☄️🚀 road to milly!
🐴 Trojan: Save 10% on Fees!
MrOwl Buy! 🦉🦉🦉 🔀 0.5 SOL ($118.64) 🔀 1,186,170.27 MrOwl 👤 dXmeHg...GgVu | Txn ⬆️ Position: 98.00% Up! 💸 Market Cap $100,300 📈 Chart ⏫ Trending ✳️ Events
x50 Boost by community 📈🚀👀
DEX has been updated ,🚀👀🦍📈 https://dexscreener.com/solana/cbakvqxgtsf4w1t8scowxbgk8awavdzeg5ysdkh7kuew
MISSED CHILLGUY? DON'T FADE FOR $MROWL SAME DEVS WITH CHILLGUY 🚀 CURRENT MCAP 49K TG : https://t.me/MrOwl_CTO_Sol CA : 98NrApd8yw88yh3sJQ6McQWiwkBXqKeb7SisEtC9pump
Team is base from US they will push this project, Artworks and kols is coming next week. Dyor/Tayor Very lowcap CA: 2bNVW8VhmZLuXjy5ApD2nxA76rMoQr9hmJG65MMHpump TG: https://t.me/babyretardio_cto WEBSITE : https://babytardioctosolana.com TWITTER: https://x.com/BbyRetardio_CTO
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rkcall99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 834,288 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@rkcall99 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rocket Launcher Call” (@rkcall99), 4,413 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rkcall99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.