Channel
@rixawp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001860356443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rixawp |
| Description | костокуницыботка связь - @gweymi |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rixawp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 5 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2024 to 17 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Доброго вечера, дорогие друзья! Перед началом рабочей недели мы решили Вас порадовать конкурсом на автограф Алины Загитовой! 🥇🤍 Условия конкурса максимально простые: 1. Быть подписанным на наш канал 2. Поставить реакцию на этот пост 3. Сделать репост данного поста к себе в канал 🐾 Итоги конкурса подведем 8 марта, желаем всем удачи! 🍀💐
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️правила ⭐️подписаться на этот тгк ( скрин желательно) ⭐️переслать на свой тгк ( скрин обьязательно) ⭐️скинуть свой прекрасный 1 эдит (только с фк) ⭐️баттл состоится завтра, время будем выбирать опросом⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
💟💟💟💟💟 #2 ☺️😜😳😘😄😳☺️😜🤩☺️800 рдно #dreamflower❤️ @apelkaavatars2
мой 3 эдит в ам 😇 ─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ── //@alinixsofficial #edit
👍1
scherevikk, winkovasx, wimuraxx, annxwin(wintrusova), scherbaxell, anix_an, winanixs, rixawp, avtruqqx, wakabuchka, veesq, liaves, mrkkkyn, trusovav, овощ, annstvil (порядок не имеет значения)
https://t.me/rixawp2 подписывайтесь на новый канал, там уже много контента
-𝐢’𝐦 𝐠𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐲𝐨𝐮🕷️ ✿︎*ﾟ︎➳🕸️ #edit #alexandratrusova 𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖙 𝖇𝖞 𝖑𝖎𝖆𝖛𝖊𝖘
мы скучаем😭 #edits
rixawp|🧚♀️ pinned «https://t.me/rixawp2 создала канал без грязи, жду всех там❤️🔥»
https://t.me/rixawp2 создала канал без грязи, жду всех там❤️🔥
петя💔
вау ливес с соткой, заслужила😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @rixawp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@rixawp named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“rixawp|🧚♀️” (@rixawp), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rixawp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.