Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for +810 𝆬ׄ 𝗋𝗂𝗐𝗐𝖾𝗑ᶦᶰᶠᵒ˖ ִ۫

Channel

+810 𝆬ׄ 𝗋𝗂𝗐𝗐𝖾𝗑ᶦᶰᶠᵒ˖ ִ۫

@riwweXD1nfo

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002681092383
TypeChannel
Usernames@flutter1nfo @riwweXD1nfo
Descriptionꪮткрытие : 07.𝟎𝟖.𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 ᦅᴡ𝗇ֹᧉr . @rin0ffc and @pusheenthecaty cᦅ – ᦅᴡ𝗇ֹᧉr . @aliswsxx
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
On Telegramt.me/riwweXD1nfo

Growth

124135129.57 August 2026 — 125 subscribers8 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers14 August 2026 — 135 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:01135+11
9 Aug 2026, 03:01124no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:25124-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:45125first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.7%
avg views ÷ 135 subscribers
Avg views / post
49.5
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held36 (7 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total1,782
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
51
Videos
15
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 7 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5467735346265487520613.3%
custom 5242239263893912643511.1%
custom 5467370475908796079511.1%
custom 5467877282049719102511.1%
custom 532787203407875388336.67%
custom 532793043704404356436.67%
custom 523803589536543616824.44%
custom 524014128833393761724.44%
custom 524453119588201117724.44%
custom 538668748802887534124.44%
custom 596526877735545210824.44%
🦄24.44%
custom 523555632914107461512.22%
custom 524000614289299811212.22%
custom 538673373623671751412.22%
custom 538686364181754978512.22%
custom 546772687229501558312.22%
💘12.22%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC13 viewsread 14 August 2026

#wonhee блин, нам тоже надо коллаб с кем то

14 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC12 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @ELLARITFDPhoto

➿ ➿🥹🔤ꫀw 🔤idꫀσ🥹➿ ➿ 🎀 ➿ 🥹🥹tiktσk 🥹⬅️ ➿ 🎀 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 id 🥹not ours cr 🥹hyunjin коллаба с нашим любимым сз 🩷💚 🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹 #сзрп #ellarit_rp + реакция

14 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC23 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

ֹ 𝆬ׄ ꕮ . ˒˓ two of hearts, two hearts that beat as one ❤️🤩 two of hearts, i need you, i 🤩 need you 🤩

custom 53278720340787538832custom 52380358953654361681custom 52422392638939126431

14 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC39 viewsread 14 August 2026

дайте бустов для ню эры пж https://t.me/boost/riwweXD1nfo 🐈

14 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC118 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🪽 ri̥wwi̥x̥ f̥loo̥d̥ 💞 ‘ 산 𝖻𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖾 🌟 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾 🤩 ( ( @ pusheen 🎀 🤩토끼 🪽 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝖾𝗋𝖺🎀🤩 🐰

custom 52422392638939126434custom 52401412883339376172custom 52445311958820111772custom 59652687773554521082custom 52355563291410746151custom 52380358953654361681custom 52400061428929981121custom 53278720340787538831

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @riwweXD1nfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 59,217 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“+810 𝆬ׄ 𝗋𝗂𝗐𝗐𝖾𝗑ᶦᶰᶠᵒ˖ ִ۫” (@riwweXD1nfo), 135 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/riwweXD1nfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.