Channel
@ritusarianus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001948969190 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ritusarianus |
| Description | Pan-aryan polytheism from a Roman point of view |
| Created | 17 October 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ritusarianus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 47 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 47 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
40 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 62.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 30.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2023 to 15 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The twenty-first century will be remembered as the one where people lost their minds. The twenty-first century will be remembered as the tireless fight against nature and against Dharma, calling nature and Dharma what is only social and laboratory experimentation: brainwashing and mutilation. The twenty-first century will be remembered as the century where the cowards have finally won a battle, purging the strong, pu…
👍1
Fixed
🔥2
I have to explain what "Ορκω μη χρω" means, because both in greek and in latin, vow, oath, and civil oath had different meanings altogether. Within this maxim, it alludes to ORKOS, what romans would call Sacramenta. A sacramentum establishes a direct relation between the person swearing (or the thing pledged in the swearing of the oath) and the Gods themselves. Initiations into mysteric traditions all entail Sacrame…
👍1
Delphic Maxim 19: Do not use an oath (Ορκω μη χρω) It is a very old motif that we are warned against swearing an oath. An oath is a sacred bond, guarded by the Gods themselves, and who swears thoughtless, will bring great calamity upon himself. Oath-breakers are always the most harshly punished, for civilization itself depends on everyone keeping an oath, and speaking honest under oath. But who can know his self fr…
Though she is right, if you follow the Roman rite, whatever you do, you first pay homage to Ianvs then Vesta, both at the start and the end, in reverse so Ianvs Vesta Main offering Vesta Ianvs
👍2🔥1
In the Roman world, the domestic cult and worship of the household gods was very important. So, after you finish deep cleaning your home, or reorganizing your home, it is incredibly helpful to take some time to praise and leave offerings to the goddesses like Vesta!
🔥3
Counter: Science just means "body of knowledge" Religion is science, for it is the body of knowledge on the metaphysical and the divine.
🔥3
Science shouldn't defeat your religion and your religion shouldn't be so set apart from science that it cannot encompass it. The two should work together with spirituality transcending science but not fleeing from it.
👍3🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
Just because some things were done historically(e.g. Human sacrifice, tribal warfare, inter-cult warfare) doesn't mean that: 1: It is traditional 2: it is rightful. That's the problem with reconstructionists. They will make history and archaeology a monolith of tradition(it is not, tradition doesn't merely stand by "that which is old") that should be re-enacted, not a place to take inspiration on. The ancients kn…
👍4🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Dishonest take tbh. The sacrifice of Hecatombs( a thousand be it cows, bulls, horses or goats) in Rome was extremely rare, and the meat fed either whole armies or cities, the corpse wasn't merely let to rot.
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ritusarianus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 845,134 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ritus Arianus” (@ritusarianus), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ritusarianus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.