Channel
@risynkiotKASSa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 18 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002670070073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @risynkiotKASSa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/risynkiotKASSa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 32 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:22 | 31 | no change |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 31 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (4 September 2026 – 10 October 2026) |
| Views total | 87 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Oct 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
189 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5206717298785681361 | 45 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5282818136381340589 | 34 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5206462083239013682 | 33 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5424701530601183180 | 27 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5282791009367895224 | 26 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5463388534419242549 | 20 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5467573516192733491 | 4 | 2.12% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 189 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @risynkiotKASSa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2026 to 10 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 я реву, что с качеством
custom 52067172987856813614custom 52828181363813405893custom 54247015306011831803custom 52064620832390136821custom 52827910093678952241custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 высер🫶
custom 52827910093678952244custom 52067172987856813613custom 52828181363813405892custom 52064620832390136821custom 54247015306011831801custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52064620832390136825custom 52828181363813405894custom 52067172987856813612custom 52827910093678952241custom 54247015306011831801custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 о боже, я сделала это. скажите что это ахуено, я очень старалась. так тем более это довольно большой проект для меня, куда я вложила очень много сил, нервов и времени. (я убила на это 3 дня) с видео помогли: @Arch_agh - ебака @srpnd - текст я знаю там куча ошибок, куча недочётов. ну сука, я ради уважения к себе закраю на это глаза. это опыт как-никак. смогли разгадать ш…
custom 52064620832390136826custom 52827910093678952243custom 52828181363813405893custom 52067172987856813611custom 54247015306011831801custom 54633885344192425491custom 54675735161927334911
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
⭐🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟⭐🌟⭐⭐⭐🌟 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 ⭐⭐⭐
custom 52827910093678952247custom 54247015306011831804custom 54633885344192425493custom 52064620832390136822custom 52067172987856813611custom 52828181363813405891
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 спустя очень много времени, у меня заказали артик! выкладываю с позвалением заказчика бля как же я орууууууууууу
custom 54247015306011831807custom 52064620832390136824custom 52067172987856813614custom 52828181363813405892custom 52827910093678952241custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
фак, пермка кончилась 😭
custom 54675735161927334913
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 я вообще без понятия, это полонценки или лайны, поэтому будет бля учусь рисовать чиби день 3 а, ну еще и арт на бумажке
custom 520671729878568136111custom 52064620832390136824custom 52828181363813405894custom 52827910093678952241custom 54247015306011831801custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 этому тгк годик, еееее🤩 я не знаю когда именно, либо 13, либо 20. ваще хз и короче в честь этого, я решила перерисовать свой старый арт. как думаете, прогресс или регресс? ну мне кажется не трудно догадаться где какой арт и за какой год
custom 52828181363813405896custom 52067172987856813613custom 52827910093678952243custom 52064620832390136822custom 54247015306011831801custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 учимся рисовать чиби день 2
custom 52067172987856813616custom 54247015306011831805custom 54633885344192425494custom 52827910093678952242custom 52064620832390136821custom 52828181363813405891
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 учусь рисовать чиби день 1 я вообще хотела нарисовать что-то простое, но получилось наоборот. еще хотела поэкспериментировать с покрасом, и вышел арт без лайна. ну в процессе лайн был, но под конец я его убрала как вам подобный стиль? вообще я вроде как должна спать.... я не хочу опять разъебывать режим сна😭
custom 52064620832390136826custom 52828181363813405895custom 52067172987856813613custom 52827910093678952242custom 54247015306011831802custom 54633885344192425491
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩 🤩 сорри, я забыла это выложить 😭
custom 52067172987856813617custom 54633885344192425495custom 52828181363813405893custom 52064620832390136821custom 52827910093678952241custom 54247015306011831801
Signed 𝕂𝕒𝕤𝕤〈!〉
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @risynkiotKASSa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кассетка кормит” (@risynkiotKASSa), 32 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/risynkiotKASSa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.