Channel
@risottoscatgirl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003776241720 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @risottoscatgirl |
| Description | 𝕬𝖓𝖉 𝖜𝖊 𝖆𝖗𝖊 𝖗𝖔𝖙𝖙𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝖋𝖗𝖔𝖒 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖎𝖓𝖘𝖎𝖉𝖊 |
| First recorded | 8 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/risottoscatgirl |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:22 | 56 | no change |
| 8 Nov 2026, 01:47 | 56 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 1 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (1 November 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 708 |
| Reactions total | 103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 24.3% | |
| custom 5188676859889493218 | 17 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5188314682477289928 | 16 | 15.5% | |
| 🍓 | 16 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5188325295341478182 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| custom 5190816114380156013 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| custom 5244852437960925023 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| custom 5280867177551918884 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| custom 5348051942213966015 | 4 | 3.88% | |
| custom 6010138992186498460 | 3 | 2.91% | |
| custom 5330246914770245381 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| custom 5397688080389940275 | 1 | 0.971% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Мамочка как всегда кормит ахх это так ттакк 🙂 ммммгг…,., #gift ∩^ω^∩ cr ::: @EngelOverdrive
❤7custom 51883146824772899286custom 51883252953414781825custom 51886768598894932183custom 52808671775519188843custom 60101389921864984603🍓2custom 52448524379609250232
Эм, да
❤6custom 53480519422139660154custom 52448524379609250233🍓1
Кем Карамелло хотела бы работать если бы не мафия? И как она относилась к тому факту что она гангстер профессия не самая благочестивая Кондитершой или фармецевткой Ну бля,она отлично понимает на что она пошла,она присоединилась к команде ради мести и справедливости,помогала своему брату, также немножко ремейкнула лор(+помогла в этом Рото) В passione были мафиози у которых была власть, они были аморальными ублюдками …
🍓4custom 51886768598894932184custom 51908161143801560133❤2custom 51883146824772899282
А как вы относитесь к пейрингам с вашими ф/о? Мне лично оч не нравятся,негативно отношусь,так как в голден винд мужиков дохуя,и мне некомфортно видеть с ним яойслопные арты 🙂🙂
Он мой первый любоф вы знали
custom 51883146824772899281
Он пишет хуйню
Он мне нравится своим дизайном,предысторией и характером Дизайн у него необычный, прям мой типаж,выглядит он как что то между металиста и риветхэда, он мне внешним видом оч напоминает мне моих любимых музыкантов как Дойл Франкенштейн,Джеймс Хэтфилд. И стенд у него тоже крутой,отсылка на Металлику,и способность очень сильная и уникальная…внешне такие милые маленькие железа Эти глаза-черные склеры и красные глаза оч ун…
❤5custom 52808671775519188841
ТУПЫЕ
🍓4custom 51883146824772899284custom 51886768598894932184custom 53302469147702453811
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 51908161143801560131
Какие тупые божн плачу 🥺🥺 сайт ∩^ω^∩
custom 51886768598894932186🍓5❤4custom 51883146824772899283custom 51908161143801560131custom 53302469147702453811
Участвуйте
❤1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @risottoscatgirl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ೇ 𓏵 Ɽiⓢօᵗƚ🍩’ꕷ Ꮸᕔ𝝩𝘨𝐢ⱤⱠ ⋆｡˚ ꕥ” (@risottoscatgirl), 56 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/risottoscatgirl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.