Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
RISING SAFFRON
@risingsaffron
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002762014703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @risingsaffron |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/risingsaffron |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 71 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 73 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 76 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 76 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦄 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Most of historian view it as gurjaradesa is a region conquered by Nagabhata pratihara and become king thus many rival inscription of Rashtrakuta descendant was called as a king of gurjara "Gurjarasnaresha" used and Nagabhata descendents inscription never claimed himself as a gurjara his always refer to pratihara suryavanshi and said himself as a lineage of laxman Ikshvaku clan debate is over here If gurjara are trib…
https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/6/9513.pdf
प्राचीन धार्मिक और स्मृतियों के ग्रंथों (जैसे मनुस्मृति) के अनुसार, 'वृषल' (Vrishala) उस व्यक्ति को कहा जाता था जो अपने धार्मिक कर्तव्यों से च्युत (अलग) हो चुका हो या जिसने वैदिक क्रियाओं, यज्ञों और संस्कारों को छोड़ दिया हो। चंद्रगुप्त मौर्य ने अपने जीवन के अंतिम समय में राजपाठ त्यागकर जैन धर्म अपना लिया था।
Pulkeshi’s Aihole inscription speaks of Latas, Malavas and Gurjaras as being subdued by the arms of Chalukya, all three are geographical terms. Chalukya king [Pulakeshin II and composed by his court poet Ravikirti in 634–635 CE, the Aihole inscription is a famous stone eulogy (prashasti) located at the Meguti Jain Temple in Karnataka. [1] These three names indeed refer to distinct geographical regions in western and…
The Imperial Pratiharas, in their Gwalior inscription of 836 CE, and through their court poet, unequivocally claim themselves to be the Raghuvamshis and descendents of Lord Lakshmana. In fact, Mahipala Praithara's court poet, Rajasekara, calls them Raghukula-bhu-Chakravarti, that is Emperors from Raghu's clan, and even refers to them as Raghukulatilaka, Jewels of the clan of Raghu. Thus, Pratiharas apart from the Gu…
This makes sense considering how Gurjaras as group is seen as an enemy, but later the region is called as their own kingdom. The Pratihara identification with the Gurjara was purely geographical.
Dasharath Sharma and Shanta Rani Sharma contend this. They rightly point out that early Pratihara rulers boased of their victories over the 'Invincible Gujraras', as given in the Gallaka inscription, dated 795 CE. These early Pratiharas claimed Gurjaras as one of their enemies that they vanquished. However, the same Pratiharas later also call Gurjaratra-bhumi, the territory of Rajasthan and Gujarat, as their home ter…
Gurjaradesa = Gujrat, Rajasthan Not a caste it's a region just like purbiya said to purvanchal people Similarly marathas r not a caste is a set of people whole live there
**Most mainstream historians conclude that the term Gurjara used by contemporary texts (like Arab travelogues or South Indian Rashtrakuta inscriptions) was originally a geographic identifier. It referred to Gurjaratra (the region encompassing modern Rajasthan and Gujarat). Therefore, "Gurjara-Pratihara" historically translated to the "Pratiharas of the Gurjara region"
The most detailed record of Nagabhata I is the famous Gwalior Inscription written by his later descendant, King Mihira Bhoja.What it says: It praises Nagabhata I for crushing the Mlechchhas (Arab Muslim invaders).The Missing Word: Nowhere in this direct family record does Nagabhata I or his descendants use the word "Gurjara" as a personal tribal label. They preferred the name Pratihara.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @risingsaffron. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RISING SAFFRON” (@risingsaffron), 71 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/risingsaffron.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.