How the Indo-Europeans Conquered the World Read the Full Article Listen to the podcast
❤🔥5

Channel
@risingrxce
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,921subscribers
-226 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001408548985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @risingrxce |
| Created | 27 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/risingrxce |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 8,921 | -32 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 8,953 | -26 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 8,979 | -27 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 9,006 | -22 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 9,028 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:47 | 9,047 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 9,067 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 9,080 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 9,084 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 9,082 | -15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 9,097 | -24 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 9,121 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 9,132 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 9,146 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 9,147 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 56 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
401 reactions across 49 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 401 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 401 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
How the Indo-Europeans Conquered the World Read the Full Article Listen to the podcast
❤🔥5
Nietzsche on Darwinism
❤🔥5
I find it difficult to genuinely hate someone when I know they’re just a npc repeating memes like a parrot. They just as easily could’ve been my parrot. They are worthless bags of meat with a voice box attachment, on both sides of any given issue. The only people worth your time are those who are free enough from spooks, to actually use intention and know what they’re doing. In other words, other magicians.
❤🔥9
People wish malice on you due to bad ideas, attack the bad ideas. The masses of people infected with those ideas are just sick idiots who don’t exert their own agency. They’re enslaved to malice, because they’re unthinking goyim trapped in a web of spookery.
❤🔥3
Our side of politics are full of nasty people, because they don’t have empathy or respect for anyone but themselves and their own version of perfect.
❤🔥1
If I died tomorrow, and people cared enough to comment - I’d just get shit on for being a degenerate or something, despite dedicating a decade of my life to speaking out for our people. It’s never enough. There’s not one person who would be given a free pass … unless they’re a historical loser who you’ve romanticized, their shit don’t stink apparently.
❤🔥1
No one will ever pass the ridiculous purity tests, and so everyone is always pissed on in their grave.
❤🔥3
But more precisely, most of the time when people like Dolly Parton or Tim Curry die - the haters don’t even have real “sins” to point to, they have to fabricate and exaggerate something to be negative about, for the sake of being negative. For example, Dolly encouraged people to get vaccinated. She also spent millions and millions of her own dollars over the decades, funding healthcare and medical facilities for Ea…
❤🔥4
That’s true, and in fact it is the wrong way to tame them anyways. To put it in a Christian context, did Jesus sacrifice himself because he hated man for his sins or because he loved man in spite of his sins?
I like the idea of debating people’s ideas, rather than dunking on them as a person when they die as a kind of virtue signal for whatever it is you found about them you don’t like. It just seems low class to me.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥8
In an era defined by perfidy, duplicity, and all kinds of bad faith action, the most vital thing you can do and be is to say what you mean and mean what you say. Right intention, right action, right mission brings the horizon of tomorrow to us today. Heaven is found in the space conquered by RIGHT ACTION.
❤🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @risingrxce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RISING RACE” (@risingrxce), 8,921 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/risingrxce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.