Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REALITY IS MENTALITY

Channel

REALITY IS MENTALITY

@rimbykate

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

18,213subscribers

+1,595 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003400595273
TypeChannel
Username@rimbykate
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rimbykate

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,61818,21317,415.57 August 2026 — 16,618 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,626 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,630 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,702 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,761 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,814 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,859 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,903 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,971 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,996 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,064 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,091 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,105 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,145 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,188 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,339 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,539 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,549 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,577 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,568 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,584 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,615 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,656 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,673 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,696 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,734 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,828 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,998 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,045 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,105 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,177 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,208 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,213 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,595. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,379–18,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:1718,213+5
16 Sept 2026, 18:0218,208+31
14 Sept 2026, 19:0118,177+72
13 Sept 2026, 03:2018,105+60
11 Sept 2026, 05:1918,045+47
8 Sept 2026, 07:5917,998+170
5 Sept 2026, 01:0017,828+94
3 Sept 2026, 09:1817,734+38
2 Sept 2026, 02:0717,696+23
1 Sept 2026, 01:0317,673+17
30 Aug 2026, 22:5617,656+41
29 Aug 2026, 22:1417,615+31
28 Aug 2026, 20:4917,584+16
27 Aug 2026, 18:1717,568-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:0217,577+28
25 Aug 2026, 22:1917,549+10
24 Aug 2026, 20:5917,539+200
23 Aug 2026, 08:0317,339+151
21 Aug 2026, 19:1517,188+43
20 Aug 2026, 15:4417,145first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 18,213 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held85 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total94,465
Reactions total5,797
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,669 reactions across 85 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,03551.1%
💘2,31713.1%
🔥2,15712.2%
🥰1,0065.69%
❤‍🔥6553.71%
😍5112.89%
🍓5032.85%
🙏4572.59%
💯2981.69%
💋1951.10%
👍1730.979%
👏990.56%
🤩700.396%
😁660.374%
💔410.232%
🎉270.153%
😘120.068%
🏆100.057%
👌100.057%
💅60.034%
10 further kinds210.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,669 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC825 views52 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🌑выход из дефицитарного мышления

30💘14🔥8

3 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,040 views40 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Новое видео на ютубе 🌟 🌑Ссылка: https://youtu.be/fhAz84AVBh4 Рассказала про систему, с помощью которой манифестировала деньги, и которая легла в основу тренига Приятного просмотра!🌑

16🔥12🥰7❤‍🔥5

3 Sept 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,280 views195 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🐚rim message Я есть часть божественного

114🥰42💘36🍓3

2 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTC≈2,380 views293 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Я еду в ноябре в Японию, и изначально план включал только Токио и Фудзи, но обстоятельства повернулись так, что я заеду еще и в Киото на неделю!! А оттуда до Нары и Осаки рукой подать, так что я посмотрю все японские города с карты желаний 💕 боже храни манифестацию аминь В деньгах получается +- автомобиль, но какая разница, это же ЯПОНИЯ.

147🔥72😍45💘16🍓5❤‍🔥4👏2😁2

2 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,600 views157 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

«Почему кто-то получает все, а кто-то ничего» ver. манифестация 🐚Ида Галич и хейта от актеров в ее сторону 🐚обстоятельства подстраиваются под мышление 🐚следствия и их причины Техника манифестации, которую обсуждает вся Америка 🐚AI в манифестации 🐚история, которую вы себе рассказываете #rim_подкаст

82❤‍🔥42💘25🍓4🔥4

1 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,940 views466 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🐚rim message Все становится лучше и лучше с каждым днем

245🔥108💘77🍓30🥰4❤‍🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,120 views105 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🌑«После тренинга доход вырос больше, чем в 10 раз» Результаты через полгода после прохождения программы. Я всегда говорю, что тренинг — это инвестиция. Кто-то видит изменения сразу, у кого-то проявление занимает какое-то время. Но каждый всегда получает свое! Запрос: любой Решение: манифестация Старт тренинга RIM по манифестации 17.09🌑

🙏4235💘28

31 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈2,870 views124 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Манифестация — это магическое мышление?? научная сторона вопросы 🖇️исследования, квантовая физика, нейропластичность, РАС, управление вниманием, мозг #rim_подкаст

70🔥23🙏19💋9💘3

31 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈2,890 views329 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🐚rim message На этой неделе со мной произойдет очень много хороших вещей

162💘87🔥55❤‍🔥25

30 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈3,320 views131 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Выходные ♥️ Впервые за долгое время так хорошо отдохнула… наполняюсь энергией перед тренингом Ходили с подружками по ресторанам, болтали обо всем подряд. Впервые посетила практику в гамаках с поющими чашами, очень понравилось!! Вытянула карты с посланиями, первое мне, второе вам🫶🏻 хочу прикупить такого рода колоду, если у вас есть классные на примете, делитесь ссылками🖤

67💘31😍20🔥11❤‍🔥2

30 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈3,160 views426 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🐚rim message Я всегда получаю или то, что хочу, или что-то еще лучше

💘178142🍓69🔥25💯10❤‍🔥2

29 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈3,790 views140 reactionsread 3 September 2026

"Мои выводы после 3 лет исследования манифестации и исполнения желаний" — новое видео на ютубе 🤍 давно не снимала длинный формат, переживаюю… обязательно посмотрите, очень полезное видео! https://youtu.be/WyvCSzDIXow

71😍33🔥19🥰7🍓4💋4💘1🙉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @rimbykate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rimbykate edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTCAnonymous Poll672 voters

Какое видео снять на ютуб первым? 💕

  1. Как стать содержанткой Бога/Вселенной (что вас содержал мир)81%
  2. Как снижать избыточный потенциал27%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REALITY IS MENTALITY” (@rimbykate), 18,213 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rimbykate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.