Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Риффона

@riffona

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,484subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693803659
TypeChannel
Username@riffona
Created26 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/riffona

Growth

1,4841,4871,485.57 August 2026 — 1,487 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,486 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,485 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,484 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,484–1,487 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:381,484-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:211,485-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:351,486-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:321,487first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 1,484 subscribers
Avg views / post
342
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,128
Reactions total828
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

828 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓46956.6%
custom 543811416800574229127933.7%
custom 5431348610967026242809.66%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 828reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @riffona. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC25 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Очень неожиданно.. что Хироки почти догнал Юичи

🍓9custom 54313486109670262422custom 54381141680057422911

7 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC141 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто будет на летнем арте? ✨

  1. Юичи41%
  2. Ясуши40%
  3. Момоко32%
  4. Хироки40%
  5. Кэтсу16%
  6. Тоши11%
  7. Йоко15%
  8. Тсунео19%

The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🍓8custom 54381141680057422915custom 54313486109670262421

7 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC144 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤩Будет второй летний арт На нём должно быть два персонажа и этих персонажей выберите вы. Голосуйте ⤵️ Голосование до завтрешнего вечера

custom 543134861096702624212🍓3custom 54381141680057422912

7 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC256 views143 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шум океана и разговоры вдалеке 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #запечатлеть_момент

🍓91custom 543811416800574229141custom 543134861096702624211

5 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC315 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Захотелось летний спешл по запечатлеть момент где персонажи купаются в бассейне

custom 543811416800574229137🍓9custom 54313486109670262421

5 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC307 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хорошо 🪄

custom 543811416800574229126🍓7custom 54313486109670262422

5 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC238 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вчера вышло продолжение главы, кто не видел 👀 Спасибо за такой большой актив с комментариями! Я прям читаю их и радусь 😊 Прошу, не забывайте ставить реакции, они тоже показывают, что Вам интересно 🥮

🍓33custom 543811416800574229111

4 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC370 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⭐️ У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Пойдем сразу с козырей, кем работает хироки? Сколько зарабатывает? Ну и главный вопрос. У него склоняется имя? Менеджер по продажам в компании, которая производит канцтовары. Зарабатывает достаточно, чтобы покупать себе мерч и ходить по клубам 🤩 На счет имени...вроде нет?... 🤩

custom 543811416800574229128🍓8custom 54313486109670262424

4 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC321 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Напоминаю о лотерее, она продлится до 20 августа 💃

🍓33custom 54381141680057422915

4 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC471 views152 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Встреча с братом 🤩 #запечатлеть_момент

custom 543811416800574229179🍓41custom 543134861096702624232

3 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC453 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💡 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Здравствуйте. Вопросики к вам в качестве сценариста: как возникла идея создания комикса запечатлеть момент? Разработан ли сюжет полностью? И что на счет других проектов? Спасибо за внимание 😊 Я гуляла с собакой и решила себя проверить, смогу ли я придумать маленькую историю, без фантастики и тому подобного. После подумала, что мне нужно сказать о ценности момента в жизни. Эта истор

🍓42custom 543811416800574229114

2 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC470 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔔У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! здравствуйте !! возможно вы уже отвечали на этот вопрос, но мне очень интересно как вы выбирали имена. были ли еще варианты, или прямо с первого раза вы поняли что конкретное имя идеально подходит для персонажа (ˊᗜˋ*)? Я читала значение имен и фамилии для каждого из персонажей, так как это очень важная вещь в Японии. Сейчас я расскажу значения фамилии и имен главных героев! 🤩Фамилия

🍓31custom 54381141680057422918custom 54313486109670262424

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @riffona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

Кто будет на летнем арте? ✨

  1. Юичи41%
  2. Ясуши40%
  3. Момоко32%
  4. Хироки40%
  5. Кэтсу16%
  6. Тоши11%
  7. Йоко15%
  8. Тсунео19%

The shares total 214%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 25,830 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Риффона” (@riffona), 1,484 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/riffona.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.