Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Rickler Treasury

@rickler_treasury

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,875subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001754542301
TypeChannel
Username@rickler_treasury
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rickler_treasury

Growth

1,8751,8791,8776 August 2026 — 1,877 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,877 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,879 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,875 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,874–1,880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:461,875-4
9 Aug 2026, 23:341,879+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:451,877no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:341,877first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.3%
avg views ÷ 1,875 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (11 February 202624 July 2026)
Views total2,597
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

772 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣29037.6%
11715.2%
❤‍🔥10814.0%
🫡779.97%
😢587.51%
334.27%
🔥314.02%
💊263.37%
🤔141.81%
🤯131.68%
🍌50.648%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 772reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC877 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В итоге получилось забрать 28%… 🫠

🫡13😢8🤣4

17 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,720 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🖐 Держу в курсе Нашел немного времени на крипту. Восстановил и улучшил работу агрегаторов Feed и Retro, закрыл Alerts. Написал пост про Rysk (не проплаченный, я им реально пользуюсь). Мой банк сейчас на 9% ниже ATH. В портфеле: 10% BTC, 10% HYPE, 20% депегнутых стейблов, остальное в нормальных стейблах и недвижке. Стал максимально эффективно использовать капитал: BTC/HYPE не пылятся на кошельке, задействую их в опц

❤‍🔥14🫡8🔥6

8 Jul 2026, 05:26 UTC≈1,750 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня последний день приёма заявок на манибек от Elfin Kingdom, в который когда-то (2022) заносили через Tokensoft. Ищите письмо на почте от tridentca.com, внутри лежат формы для заполнения. ⏰ Дедлайн: 08.07 13:00 AST или 08/07 20:00 МСК

52😢2

5 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,650 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отправлял заявку 10 раз, хотел билдить on Arc, но во все разы получил отказ. Не знаю кого они там набирают, однако на сервере 26к человек все же как-то оказалось... Повезло им)

🤣16🤔94

30 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC≈2,060 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🤣12🫡4💊2

25 Jun 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,520 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Re Protocol тоже скам какой-то. Если свапать их стейбл reUSDe через дексы, то получается -10% от точки входа, а функция Redeem пока в разработке 😂😂😂

🤣175🤯5

25 Jun 2026, 15:50 UTC≈2,440 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Побрило меня знатно на просадке BTC и STRC... 20% банка в депегнутых стейблах, найс пофармил))) Я планировал выпрыгивать из этой пирамидки уже в июне, но не успел 😢

🫡28😢19💊6

4 Jun 2026, 08:46 UTC≈2,730 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥱 Недоброе утро... Я в крипте уже 7-й год, имею довольно консервативную стратегию, выработал некий иммунитет к падениям, но даже так — мне некомфортно. В крипте 10% от капитала, большая часть — в BTC. AI забрали много внимания и денег на себя. Не думаю, что это конец для битка или крипты, но тенденция грустная. Вероятно, это хороший момент, чтобы начинать что-то откупать. Я пока не дергаюсь. Отскочили неплохо, кра

🫡166🤔5

19 May 2026, 19:35 UTC≈2,760 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bullish on Kraken 👍👍🤓🤫

145🔥3

3 May 2026, 17:26 UTC≈3,150 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня провел полный аудит своего банка. 🔍 Делаю это 1-2 раза в год, чтобы понимать my total net worth, в том числе за пределами web 3. Плюс в крипте часто что-то зависает на кошельках в каком-нибудь чейне, после выводов из DeFi или продаж дропов... Так я нахожу сотки в зимних куртках. Итог: банк снова на ATH! 🔥 За последнее время ощутимая просадка была только на Aztec, но этот минус я уже отбил. Накапали проценты

🤣3623🔥14

1 May 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,630 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

До 1 лярда включительно действительно было ноубрейн, каждый мог! 🤑

🤣18🔥54

30 Apr 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,490 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хороший сейлик был, но видимо не судьба. Зря некоторые вдавались в глубокий ресерч, сравнивали с pump.fun, BONK, это проекты вообще даже не рядом. У нас стояла задача слить в плюс и забыть. Детальную аналитику оставляйте откупаторам на ТГЕ. Что случилось, если кратко: Кто-то рагнул проект, который недавно был запущен через Printr, из-за этого пошел фад и начали дампить другие токены, запущенные через Printr (бредик)

🤣21🫡8🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rickler_treasury. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 212,804 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rickler Treasury” (@rickler_treasury), 1,875 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rickler_treasury.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.