Channel
@rickjewersreplacementofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
395subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002261167559 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rickjewersreplacementofficial |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rickjewersreplacementofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 395 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 395 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,109 |
| Reactions total | 128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
128 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 125 | 97.7% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ASCENSION UPDATE AUGUST 6, 2026 Today is Commemorated as the Day of Transfiguration in most of Christianity. Although this selected Day to Celebrate the actual event is not the Day of the year it actually happen on, what is most important is the widespread Belief associated with the Transformation of Jesus Christ event itself. It is important to know that widespread Belief is an Energy that affects, effects, and i…
❤5
White Hats, Q, and the Promise of Global Redemption: Does the Narrative Withstand Scrutiny? This examination is not written to condemn Those Who Sincerely placed Their Trust in the “White Hats,” Q, or the promises of an unseen plan. Many were drawn by a Genuine longing for Justice, Peace, Freedom, and the protection of Humanity, and God Prime Creator fully Innerstands how Faith, Hope, fear, and suffering may leave …
Extraordinary Claims should therefore be verified through official statements, reliable records, and multiple Independent sources rather than accepted solely because digital media appears convincing. Careful verification is becoming an essential part of responsible Discernment. ## From Waiting to Participation Perhaps the most significant question is not whether hidden groups exist. The greater question is what r…
❤6👏2
Where is God? Many may be and are asking this question worldwide now. Many are turning to God in this now, as well as Representations and Emanations of God, like Mother Mary and Jesus Christ. It is this Sincere Choice and Willingness to accept and Believe in God, that actually opens the Higher Channels of Communication with God, and subsequently makes God more accessible to the Individual. Eyes begin to open wider,…
❤10
# PART 3 # HUMAN POSITION, DISCERNMENT, AND RESPONSE ### Application Within a Multi-Layered Reality ## PURPOSE Following the Interfaith record of Luminous phenomena and non-Human Intelligences (Part I), and the interpretive framework of Alignment and Influence (Part II), this section addresses the practical question: What is the position of Humanity within this Reality, and how should One respond? --- ## HUMAN…
❤2
PART 2 INTERPRETING NON-HUMAN INTELLIGENCES Benevolent and Malevolent Influences, Alignment, and Discernment The term “Galactics” is a modern expression used in contemporary Spiritual frameworks to describe Intelligent Beings or forms of Consciousness Innerstood to originate beyond Earth—whether from other star systems, dimensions, or levels of Existence. In its highest interpretation, these Beings are considere…
❤2
PART I LIGHTS IN THE SKY, CELESTIAL CRAFT, AND NON-HUMAN INTELLIGENCES An Interfaith and Indigenous Comparative Reference ## PURPOSE AND METHOD This reference gathers accounts from Religious and Indigenous Traditions describing unusual Lights in the sky, Luminous Beings, Celestial vehicles, and non-Human Intelligences associated with the Heavens. Original sources describe these phenomena using Spiritual language…
For Any currently working 40 to 80 hours a week to just pay bills and survive, You need to know that the Replacement System is coming that will at first only require You about 10 hours a week working time to Live, and decreasing quickly thereafter to perhaps about 4 hours a week. When this new system will be implemented, depends upon how long it takes for the majority worldwide to consent with it. It could easily…
❤13🤔1
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86820093937 https://www.facebook.com/rickjewers
❤1
ASCENSION CONSIDERATIONS PROPHETS AND SACRED FIGURES TAKEN UP A Condensed Interfaith Reference PURPOSE This reference presents accounts from multiple Religious Traditions of Prophets, Sacred Teachers, Saints, and Enlightened Figures described as being taken into Heaven, raised by the Divine, Ascending into Higher Realms, disappearing from physical view, or transforming beyond ordinary death. Terminology vari…
❤8
The Flood in the Days of Noah — A Consolidated Innerstanding In the Biblical record (Genesis 6–9), the Flood in the days of Noah is not attributed to a single cause, but to a convergence of conditions that had reached a critical threshold. The text states clearly that the wickedness of Humanity had become great upon the Earth, with every inclination of thought continually aligned toward evil. The Earth itself was d…
❤5
The Days of Noah and the Present Hour — A Call to Awareness and Choice In the Biblical record of Genesis 6–9, the Flood in the days of Noah came as the result of a convergence of conditions that had reached a critical point. Humanity had entered into widespread corruption, where the thoughts and actions of People had turned continually toward harm, and the Earth itself had become filled with violence. The text furt…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rickjewersreplacementofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 310,580 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rick Jewers Replacement Official Channel” (@rickjewersreplacementofficial), 395 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rickjewersreplacementofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.