2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,503–1,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 14:44
1,503
-1
21 Aug 2026, 23:45
1,504
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 1,503 subscribers
Avg views / post
217
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 May 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
217
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
40
90.9%
👍
4
9.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه سوال ازتون میپرسم خودتون جوابشونو بدید
بنظرتون این جنگی که در راهه دور اخر جنگ و حمله نظامیه؟
و قراره چطور تموم بشه؟
بزار سه حالت بگیم
۱)یک جنگ و پایان همه چی و یک سیستم جدید
۲)یک جنگ برای رسیدن به یک توافق و تسلیم شدن یکی
۳)یک جنگ فرسایشی و طولانی مدت ادامه شرایط بلاتکلیفی و محاصره دریایی
حالا مهمترین سوال تو هر کدوم از این حالت ها کدوم بازار بهتره؟
ببین این جنگ یه روزی تموم میشه با پایان جنگ قیمت دارایی های که تحت تاثیر جنگ قیمتشون باید تغییر میکرد نکرد
تغییر میکنه
پس اگه چیزی میخوایید بخرید بسم الله
مخصوصا اگه داراییتون دلار طلا اگر بوده
طلا شب عید بشه 27 میلیون هم دیگه قیمت بقیه اجناس ثابت نمیمونه
اما الان چون بعضی بازار های داخل رکودن هنوز خودشونو بت دلار نرسوندن
هنوز جنگ تموم نشده اینو در نظر داشته باشید
همون اول گفتم این موشکا واسه رفتن سر میز مذاکرس ولی
هنوز نه تنگه باز شده نه محاصره برداشته شده
باز هم فرصت خروج پیدا میکنید این چند وقت اگر نیاز دارید چیزی بخرید دیگه وقتشه چون ممکنه تو رکود دیگه نتونید این کار کنید
هنوز خیلی چیزا اونقدری گرون نشده که مردم پولشو نداشته باشن
ولی گرون میشه
مخصوصا هزینه خدمات
و کالا های انحصاری
پس خریداتون درست انجام بدید هر چیزی ارزش خرید…
ترامپ تا لحظه ای که ذره ای امید داشته باشه
انتخابش بدون شک توافقه
ولی فعلا این محاصره دریایی بهتر از موشک داره کار میکنه براش
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @richcrow2000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مستری بوک | کتاب رایگان @mastrybook · 86,606 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“امیری” (@richcrow2000), 1,503 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/richcrow2000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.