Channel
@ribensucaic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,485subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003846611183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ribensucaic |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 17 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ribensucaic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 4,485 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 4,490 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 4,496 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 4,496 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (17 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最新深夜福利频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 1️⃣猎奇 人妻 ： @qiangjianf6 2️⃣吃瓜ღ猎奇： @lieqia8 3️⃣ 91 老司机 ： @qiangjianccc 4️⃣ 成人熟女 ： @qiangjianvk 5️⃣ 熟女人妻 ： @swagpxv 6️⃣ 偷拍淫妻 ： @jhelloworld_kaifa 7️⃣ 丝袜 乱伦 ： @iLook_world1688 8️⃣ 乱伦 强奸： @vHello_Gpt168 9️⃣ 商场 偷拍： @CEOHelpl ➡️少妇 淫妻： @chat007kefu_chat007kefu
File, posted without a caption
⭐️购买人设⭐️诚信为本⭐️素材分类⭐️国家明细 1️⃣人设套图【亚洲女】： @taotuddm1 2️⃣人设套图【亚洲男】： @taotuddm2 3️⃣人设套图【欧洲女】： @taotuddm3 4️⃣人设套图【欧洲男】： @taotuddm4 5️⃣人设套图【私密照】： @taotuddm5 6️⃣亚洲女证件 亚洲女】： @taotuddm6 7️⃣亚洲男证件 亚洲男】： @taotuddm7 8️⃣欧美女证件 欧洲女】： @taotuddm8 9️⃣欧美男证件 欧洲男】： @taotuddm9 🔖精聊话术素材 免费话术 ： @jingliao_huashw 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣：【购买套图】请联系♥️叮当猫♥️： ➡️ @taotu56789 🟢🟢 商务合作投稿 广告投放👉联系 广告投放 分类清晰，方便查找！ 搜索方法：输入 “#关键词”，需要带上“#”号，例如 #国内 #香港 #台湾 等等！ 😄 …
🌟新用户专享福利🌟 第一次使用取卡针出海？ 🌹 直接领取 10个端口 · 7天免费试用 无需立刻付费，先体验真实效果、再决定是否长期使用。 https://t.me/qukazhenqukazhen
❤1
精聊话术 整理了很多出来大家可以订阅后期更新。 精聊入金 精聊开客户 https://t.me/jingliao_huashw
素材频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 【韩国素材】：➡️ @hanguosucaiz 【日本素材】：➡️ @ribensucaic 【美国素材】：➡️ @sucai1meiguo 【中国素材】：➡️ @sucai1zhongguo 【印度素材】：➡️ @sucai1yindu 【马来西亚素材】：➡️ @sucai1malaixiya 【翻译频道如下】⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 【翻译器计数器】： ➡️ @HappyWorld009HappyWorld009 【取卡针全球跨境】： ➡️ @qukazhenqukazhen 【helloworld】： ➡️ @helloworld_kaifahelloworld_kaifa 【海王SCRM】： ➡️ @HaiWangAppHaiWangApp 【CC翻译】谷歌翻译： ➡️ @chatms…
最新深夜福利频道如下⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 1️⃣后入菊花➡️ @hourujuhuab 2️⃣偷情人妻➡️ @touqingrenqix 3️⃣国产视频➡️ @lieqiaz 4️⃣熟女少妇➡️ @lieqiam 5️⃣成人熟女➡️ @lieqiax 6️⃣乱伦强奸➡️ @luanlunqiangjiani 7️⃣酒店监控➡️ @toupaichaodix 大哥大姐们可以先关注一下
⭐️购买人设⭐️诚信为本⭐️素材分类⭐️国家明细 1️⃣人设套图【亚洲女】： @rcvczz 2️⃣人设套图【亚洲男】： @rscrxx 3️⃣人设套图【欧洲女】： @rscsoo 4️⃣人设套图【欧洲男】： @rscvcc 5️⃣人设套图【私密照】： @rzcnzz 6️⃣亚洲女证件 亚洲女】： @rscrzx 7️⃣亚洲男证件 亚洲男】： @rvrxcc 8️⃣欧美女证件 欧洲女】： @rzcxrr 9️⃣欧美男证件 欧洲男】： @rznsuu ➡️译达通 翻译 【智能区】：@edt_ai_edt_ai ➡️翻译 【智能区】： @alookworld88888 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣：【购买套图】请联系♥️小爱素材♥️： ➡️ @xiaoaimm 🟢🟢 商务合作投稿 广告投放👉联系 广告投放 分类清晰，方便查找！ 搜索方法：输入 “#关键词”，需要带上“#”号，例如 #国内 #香港 #台湾 等等！ 😄 …
翻译频道出海🐴👁👀🫁最优质的合作导航🧦👣🤵♂️ 💰广告商： 【Happy world翻译器计数器】点 👈 👍广告商：【取卡针全球跨境客服平台】点 👈 👍广告商： 【 helloworld 官方客服中心 海外社交软件PC端 】点 👈 🎨广告商： 【海王SCRM-聚合自动翻译计数器】点 👈 🥷🏻广告商： 【CC翻译】谷歌翻译 | Deepl翻译 | 语音克隆点 👈 ⭐️广告商：【速推官方频道-专业营销软件】点 👈 😀广告商：【Hello GPT 智能翻译 销冠必备 】点 👈 ✨广告商：【Look world.pro翻译软件 出海必备】点👈 👉广告商：【007chat官方通知频道（小颖🌸）】点 👈 🫠广告商：【♥️小爱素材♥️ 24h在线营业】点👈 😎广告商：【私密树洞社区】点👈 👍广告商：【绘图大师（原名钻图）】点👈 翻译软件-专业批发-零售各类成品软件等需要请联系客服 🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠 @wvsuc
🌸不死号不封号防屏蔽国际客服系统，安全稳定 🌸 007开户唯一联系✈️ ： https://t.me/chat007kefu 🌸唯一官方频道 @Chat007_guanfang
#芝加哥 #购物 #拉夫劳伦 #逛街 #日常 芝加哥 downtown 的 Ralph Lauren，全球最大的门店，其实更像一套被搬进城市里的“旧世界场景”。看到的这些深色木墙、油画、马术元素，本来是19世纪欧洲贵族乡村宅邸里的标配，但 Ralph Lauren 做了一件很有意思的事——把这种原本属于私人庄园的生活方式，拆出来放进最繁忙的城市中心。于是就出现了这种反差：外面是芝加哥最现代的街区，里面却在讲一个关于传统、阶层和慢生活的故事。本质上，这不是复古，而是一种被精心设计过的“时间错位”，让人短暂地从城市节奏里跳出来，进入一个更讲究仪式感的世界。
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ribensucaic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 203,987 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ribensucaic named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【日本素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|taotu renshe riben sucai” (@ribensucaic), 4,485 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ribensucaic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.