Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RGD_NEWS

Channel

RGD_NEWS

@rgd_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

202subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001684018593
TypeChannel
Username@rgd_news
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 14 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/rgd_news

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

202205203.57 August 2026 — 205 subscribers7 August 2026 — 205 subscribers9 September 2026 — 204 subscribers1 October 2026 — 202 subscribers7 August 20261 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 55 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 08:58202-2
9 Sept 2026, 02:57204-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:18205no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:04205first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9150.0%
🔥5128.0%
👎137.14%
❤73.85%
🤔52.75%
💩42.20%
😁42.20%
🤯31.65%
👀10.549%
💊10.549%
💯10.549%
🤬10.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2022 to 23 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
308
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
422
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
alfapartners119 August 202419 August 2024

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2022 to 23 December 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2025, 01:18 UTC139 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Порошенко раскрыл страшную тайну. Он заявил, что ракеты «Фламинго», производимые Fire Point, взлетают очень эффективно , но не способны поражать цели. Экс-президент заявил, что украинские ракеты «Фламинго» не поражают объекты, а фактически используются как ложные цели при одновременном запуске с крылатыми ракетами «Нептун». По словам Порошенко, в ракетах установлены старые двигатели, закупленные много лет назад в…

🔥1

21 Aug 2024, 05:07 UTC537 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Минобороны РФ: в Вооруженных силах РФ созданы группировки войск «Белгород», «Курск» и «Брянск». Они будут отвечать за защиту граждан и территорий приграничных регионов от атак дронов и иных средств нападения. Об этом стало известно на заседании Координационного совета по вопросам военной безопасности приграничных территорий под руководство Белоусова. Юнус-Бек Евкуров назначен замруководителя координационного совета…

👍8

21 Aug 2024, 05:02 UTC466 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рак лёгких научились лечить российские учёные. Препарат разработали в МФТИ. Он поражает непосредственно злокачественные клетки, минимально воздействуя на здоровые ткани. Испытания пройдут уже в ближайшие месяцы

👍4🔥1

20 Aug 2024, 15:45 UTC422 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Опубликованы кадры из суда, где был продлен арест четырем соучастникам нападения на "Крокус Сити Холл" в Подмосковье.

👍7

20 Aug 2024, 12:18 UTC354 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Фашистам не понравилось в Курской области 🤦

🔥5💩1

20 Aug 2024, 12:17 UTC302 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Извинения перед жителями Курской области от двух фашистов. Спасибо 382 отдельному батальону морской пехоты 810-й гвардейской отдельной бригады🫡

🔥5🤬1

20 Aug 2024, 12:12 UTC260 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Немецкий журналист Коппель: Зеленский начал свою агрессивную войну на российской земле. Что он хочет? Хочет ли он напасть на Москву? Хочет ли он взорвать атомную электростанцию в Курске, чтобы создать вулкан эскалации? Что именно он пытается сделать? Утопит ли он там свои войска? Очевидно, что пути отступления находятся под серьезной угрозой. ВСУ смогли закрепиться, но русские эвакуируют гражданское население, что мо…

🔥3💊1💯1

20 Aug 2024, 11:30 UTC258 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Зеленский получил отказ со стороны союзников на просьбу вернуть украинцев призывного возраста в Украину – Bloomberg Политики от Польши до Венгрии заявили, что не будут отправлять беженцев назад, пока идет война, пишет издание.

😁3👀1

20 Aug 2024, 11:29 UTC267 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Прямо сейчас идёт самый масштабный бой за всю историю СВО, свыше 2000 ВСУшников и иностранных наёмников уже уничтожено, битва за Курск станет решающей, кто одержит победу тут, победит в войне, тела убитых валяются всюду, работает авиация, грады, артиллерия, солнцепеки, это ужас, наркоман ЗЕ не жалеет украинцев, они идут толпами, но их разрывает на куски наша артиллерия». В эти минуты я публикую первые кадры с места…

👍3🔥2

19 Aug 2024, 09:18 UTC266 viewsread 7 August 2026

Добрый день, всем кому интересен дополнительный заработок присоединяйтесь, все подробности тут: https://t.me/traging_russia

19 Aug 2024, 09:06 UTC278 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://alfabank.ru/get-money/credit-cards/land/365-days-partners/?platformId=alfapartners_msv_CC-365_484814_5145237&utm_source=alfapartners&utm_medium=msv&utm_term=CC-365&utm_campaign=484814&utm_content=alfapartners_msv_CC-365_484814_5145237

19 Aug 2024, 09:04 UTC298 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://alfabank.ru/everyday/package/premium/rings/?platformId=alfapartners_msv_DC-rings_484814_5145234&utm_source=alfapartners&utm_medium=msv&utm_term=DC-rings&utm_campaign=484814&utm_content=alfapartners_msv_DC-rings_484814_5145234

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rgd_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RGD_NEWS” (@rgd_news), 202 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rgd_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.