Channel

🤔

@rf200_nooow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

67subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001328348597
Type	Channel
Username	@rf200_nooow
Created	16 June 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	10 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/rf200_nooow

Growth

3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:33	67	+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:16	65	no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:36	65	first reading

Engagement

1 post held, back to 16 June 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1 post for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,171,932 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Что посмотреть, Чувак?
@dudefilm · 11,7076 posts 👥АнІІчан👥
@AnIIchahn · 101 post володя путин Врет
@putin_vret · 201 post Тайны археологии
@secret_of_archeology · 2,3031 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q111223457 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
Label	Look for Your Own
Description	Web project to identify captured and killed Russian soldiers during the war with Ukraine.
YouTube	UC8juxfcRfSm9Af90S4mZE1Q

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Look for Your Own (en.wikipedia.org)
“…[[Ukraine]] | owner = [[Ministry of Internal Affairs (Ukraine)]] | url = https://t.me/rf200_nooow | launch_date = February 2022 }} '''Look for Your Own''' ({{langx|ru|Ищи…”
read 9 August 2026

Втрати 137-го парашутно-десантного полку (РФ) (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…молодший сержант || 25.09.1990{{Cite web|title=Ищи своих|url=https://t.me/rf200_nooow/1402|website=Telegram|accessdate=2022-09-08}}|| 25.03.2022||…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🤔” (@rf200_nooow), 67 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rf200_nooow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

🤔