3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 581–669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 08:37
659
+68
4 Oct 2026, 10:22
591
no change
4 Oct 2026, 09:47
591
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
80.2%
avg views ÷ 659 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026
Posts held
19 (31 August 2026 – 3 October 2026)
Views total
8,455
Reactions total
102
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
119 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
59
49.6%
👍
26
21.8%
🔥
20
16.8%
❤🔥
6
5.04%
👎
6
5.04%
🖕
1
0.84%
🤡
1
0.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rezka_narezka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 August 2026 to 3 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💸Как выводить крипту с выплат за Баннерную рекламу / МассПостинг / UGC - контент.
Большинство рекламодателей площадок производят выплаты за ролики именно на крипту.
Но чтобы обменять их надо пройти еще несколько шагов. Верификация, а также провести p2p сделку где присутствует риск получения незаконных средств.
Плати - Как Раньше.
Закрывает эту боль и позволяет выводить криптовалюту прямо на карту без KYC и верифи…
⭐️Крупный Розыгрыш на 5 Telegram Premium на 3 месяца..😋
Друзья каждого рады видеть в наших комьюнити связанных с нарезками, клиппингом, баннерной рекламы. Решили порадовать вас и устроить розыгрыш 5 Telegram Premium среди подписчиков 🎁
Условия:
Быть подписанным на каналы, которые указаны в боте под постом.. Да и в принципе все
Дерзайте, итоги конкурса будут 9.10 в 21:00 МСК ✅
📱 Instagram рассказал, какие Reels сейчас хочет видеть
Instagram* обновил рекомендации по созданию Reels. Ничего революционного, но несколько моментов площадка отдельно подсветила.
Короткие ролики на 3-15 секунд лучше подходят под тренды, быстрые переходы и короткие идеи. Диапазон 15-60 секунд Instagram* называет основным для большинства форматов, включая туториалы и лайфстайл. Ролики от минуты до трёх советуют ост…
📱 YouTube обновил мобильную ленту и убрал длительность видео с превью
В обновлённой мобильной версии YouTube у части пользователей на главной странице больше не отображается продолжительность ролика прямо на превью.
Из-за этого перед открытием видео нельзя сразу понять, рассчитано оно на 5 минут или, например, на полчаса. Пользователи уже жалуются, что это усложняет выбор контента: если времени мало, приходится отк…
📱 YouTube разрешит собирать ленты через текстовые запросы
На Made On YouTube 2026 показали Custom Feeds. Пользователь сможет описать словами, что именно хочет смотреть, а YouTube соберет под этот запрос отдельную персональную ленту.
Параллельно платформа расширяет ИИ внутри YouTube Studio. Там появились Ask Studio, новые инструменты для Shorts, а также функции для тестирования разных хуков и обложек.
🔎 Инструменты от меня для заработка на вертикальных видео и не только...
1. Актуальные оффера – (см. закреп) 📣
2. VPN – https://t.me/oversecureone_bot (пользуюсь почти год, проблем ни разу не возникало. Множество локаций, + обход белых списков.) 🔑.
3. Proxy – тут я советую вам два сервиса: Asocks и PROXY6.NET. качественные и дешёвые прокси на рынке. (Используйте промокод RezkaNarezka и получайте хорошую скидку). …
📱 Facebook* режет органику со ссылками
С 16 декабря Meta начинает ограничивать публикации с внешними ссылками для части страниц и профилей в Professional Mode без Meta Verified. В рамках теста таким аккаунтам могут оставить только два органических поста с URL в месяц.
Обычные публикации без внешних переходов ограничение не затронет. Ссылки в комментариях по-прежнему можно использовать, переходы на Instagram* и Whats…
📱 MrBeast решил продавать книгу
15 сентября 2026 года вышла книга MrBeast и Джеймса Паттерсона, автора, которого давно считают одной из главных фабрик бестселлеров и который регулярно работает в соавторстве.
Накануне инсайдеры писали, что по предзаказам релиз может провалиться. Причина очевидная: аудитория MrBeast отлично смотрит YouTube и TikTok, но совсем не факт, что в тех же масштабах покупает книги.
Но тут в …
📱 Meta открыла бесплатный доступ к Muse с лимитом 100 млн токенов в неделю
Meta представила Muse, нового AI-агента, который может самостоятельно взаимодействовать с браузером, электронной почтой и календарем. Он умеет переходить по сайтам, открывать нужные страницы, заполнять формы и даже совершать покупки без постоянного участия пользователя.
Самое интересное сейчас в условиях доступа. Muse можно тестировать беспл…
📱 YouTube разрешил монетизировать реакции на чужие стримы
YouTube расширяет тест функции Watch With. Теперь с телефона можно запустить React Live и стримить свою реакцию прямо поверх чужой трансляции.
На экране одновременно идёт оригинальный эфир и ваша реакция, а сам стрим можно монетизировать как обычную трансляцию.
При этом исходный автор тоже ничего не теряет. Просмотры и watch time, которые пришли через такие…
💍 Давно хотел разобраться, есть ли вообще смысл использовать антидетект-браузер, если работаешь сразу с несколькими аккаунтами.
Посмотрел несколько вариантов и отдельно попробовал AdsPower.
По ощущениям, основная ценность здесь даже не в самом браузере, а в том, насколько удобно всё организовано. Можно создавать отдельные профили под разные задачи, хранить их отдельно и не превращать рабочий процесс в бесконечное п…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rezka_narezka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rezka Narezka” (@rezka_narezka), 659 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezka_narezka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.