Channel
@rezeda_ielts_academic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,425subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001965108839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rezeda_ielts_academic |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rezeda_ielts_academic |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 1,425 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 1,427 | +4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 1,423 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 1,425 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 1,426 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 1,425 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 1,426 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 1,423 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 1,423 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
349 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 222 | 63.6% | |
| 🔥 | 88 | 25.2% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 6.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.01% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.43% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.15% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.287% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
друзья, мест на индивидуальную подготовку к экзамену пока нет 🥹 места появятся с 7 сентября) пожалуйста, записывайтесь заранее - в декабре/январе у многих университетов дедлайны) и желательно заложите 3-4 месяца на подготовку в комфортном темпе без перегруза) можно самостоятельно начать подготовку к частям Reading и Listening по моим вебинарам - ссылки кликабельные
❤15🔥2👍1
у меня недавно сразу две ученицы получили 8 по writing!! и одна из них как раз за эссе advantages disadvantages выше!! было приятно, что тот подход, который я даю ученикам в этом типе эссе, сработал 🥹 расклад баллов уже получили - task response 8! 🔥 поделюсь всем чуть позже, пока руки не доходят!))
❤27🔥9👍1
Задания ученицы с экзамена в Стамбуле Граф выше Эссе: In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government pays for them. Do you think the advantages that the government pays the money outweigh the disadvantages?
❤12👍1🔥1
Забыла поделиться с вами заданиями с экзамена ученицы в Стамбуле в прошлые выходные :) Граф похож на этот, но 4 предмета + первая картинка males and females в 1960, а вторая males and females в 2000 Эссе - Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?
❤13👍1🔥1
сегодня на экзамене в Португалии (город Порту), CD, idp друзья, это что writing сет мечты?)))))))))) 🔵граф как на фото выше 🔵эссе - In many countries, the number of animals and plants is declining. Why do you think this is happening? How can this issue be solved? 🔵спикинг - p1 work/study + morning, p2 describe a time when you couldn't use your phone, p3 rules (например, были ли правила строже в прошлом чем сейчас…
❤16🔥5👍1
Результат Кристины! W 7.0, S 8.0 - просто умничка! ❤️ Это результат, которым можно гордиться абсолютно любому сдающему, а Кристина ещё только закончила 10 класс 🥹
🔥30❤🔥7❤5
Кстати, результаты ученицы за эти задания мы уже получили 🥰 Чуть позже более подробно поделюсь) 7.0 Writing 🔥 8.0 Speaking 🔥
🔥16👍2❤1
Задания с экзамена ученицы в Гонконге, в прошлую субботу ❤️ 🔵 Граф примерно как на фото, но цифры все до 45% и немного другие секторы 🔵 Эссе - many children and teenagers today commit crimes. Why is this the case? How should they be punished? 🔵Спикинг ➡️1 часть work/study + team sports + favourite food ➡️2 часть advice you gave someone ➡️3 часть: 1) в каких ситуациях молодым людям лучше обратиться за помощью к др…
🔥6❤5👍1
иногда в работах учеников вижу, что mental health и emotional health используются как синонимы) это разные вещи, отвечающие за разные функции - не являются взаимозаменяемыми)
❤19🙏5👍2
✔️Значок валюты ставится перед цифрой, без пробелов. *в неформальных контекстах, в соц сетях например, иногда значок идет после, но для графов в экзамене нам такое не подходит ✔️Если вдруг забудете на экзамене, просто пропишите валюту словом после цифры: 100,000 dollars. * также тысячи и выше пишутся с запятой для каждых трех цифр с конца, без пробела 100,000; 3,000,000
❤24👍1🔥1
Coherence and Cohesion 🤍 В английском академ письме приветствуется компактность. Если что-то можно сказать 2 словами вместо 5, короткой версии всегда отдадут предпочтение. ⬇️Поделюсь практическим советом: если у вас в предложении есть отрицание через not, подумайте о том, чтобы сделать его через отрицательный суффикс: ➡️not useful - useless А теперь к примеру из работы ученицы ниже. Здесь и вовсе двойное отрицани…
🔥12❤8👍1
An increasing use of computers and mobile phones has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Предлагаю разобрать ошибку в понимании этой темы, которую часто слышу у учеников, когда мы вместе разбираем темы на предмет ловушек. 1️⃣Во-первых, в теме выше есть 2 подтемы: Reading skills + writing skills. Нужно обязательно раскрыть оба аспекта; самый п…
❤22👌4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @rezeda_ielts_academic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rezeda IELTS Academic 🇬🇧” (@rezeda_ielts_academic), 1,425 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezeda_ielts_academic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.