🔸 بالاخره داوینچی ریزالو از فرمت Prores RAW پشتیبانی کرد! @rezasaad
❤8🔥3

Channel
@rezasaad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,827subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001358504459 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rezasaad |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rezasaad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 1,827 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 1,830 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 1,833 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 1,834 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,840 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 1,840 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
43 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 25.6% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2025 to 15 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔸 بالاخره داوینچی ریزالو از فرمت Prores RAW پشتیبانی کرد! @rezasaad
❤8🔥3
توی این کانال در مورد هوش مصنوعی صحبت میکنم : @rezasaadplus
👏2❤1🔥1
🔸 همه دورههای موجود در سایت در یک نگاه @rezasaad
🔸 ویدیو جدید 🔸 ساخت عکس و ویدیو رایگان با آپدیت جدید هوش مصنوعی گوگل | Imagen 3 + Veo 2 🔗 مشاهده در یوتیوب 🔆 سیستم پرامپت تولید عکس 🔆 سیستم پرامپت تولید ویدیو @rezasaadplus
🔸 سیستم پرامپت برای تولید عکس های بهینه 🔸 توی این ویدیو در مورد یک سیستم پرامپت صحبت کردم که اگر بهش یک جمله ساده به فارسی بدید ، به شما یک پرامپت مهندسی شده و بهینه به زبان انگلیسی و یک Negative پرامپت میده. 🔻 پرامپت : Task: Transform the given input into a highly detailed, optimized, and structured prompt for AI image generation. Output Language: Only English Prompt Structure: -Core Description: Scene, subject, …
🥰2
✨ گره خوردین تو نودهای پیچیدهی داوینچی ریزالو؟ 🤔 بیاین یه ترفند ساده ولی کاربردی برای مرتب کردنشون یاد بگیریم! حتماً براتون پیش اومده که چندتا نود مختلف دارین که همگی یه کار مشابه انجام میدن، مثلاً تنظیم نور و کنتراست یا اعمال یه افکت خاص. 💡 یه پیشنهاد خوب اینه که به جای چیدن خطی این نودهای مرتبط پشت سر هم، اونها رو به صورت عمودی زیر هم قرار بدین. 🌳 این کار شبیه به دستهبندی بصری عمل میکنه. چرا این کار مفیده؟ 🤔…
👍5
✨ گره خوردین تو نودهای پیچیدهی داوینچی ریزالو؟ 🤔 بیاین یه ترفند ساده ولی کاربردی برای مرتب کردنشون یاد بگیریم! 👇
👍1
🔸 ویدیو جدید 🔸 ساخت ویدیو با هوش مصنوعی گوگل رایگان شد | Google Veo 2 🔗 مشاهده در یوتیوب 🔗 سیستم پرامپتی که توی ویدیو در موردش صحبت کردم @rezasaadplus
🔸 گوگل قابلیت تولید ویدیو رو به سرویس Whisk اضافه کرده. 🔸 البته جای خوشحالی زیادی نداره؛ چون رایگان نیست! ولی همینکه از سرویس Veo 2 استفاده میکنه به این معنیه که با چیز باکیفیتی طرفیم. 🔗 در مورد Whisk یه ویدیو دارم. میتونید از اینجا ببینید. @rezasaadplus
👍1🥰1
🔸 همه دورههای موجود در سایت در یک نگاه @rezasaad
🔥2👍1😎1
🔸 ویدیو جدید 🔸 جادوی ترکیب عکس ها با هوش مصنوعی ناشناخته گوگل ویسک | Whisk 🔗 مشاهده در یوتیوب 🔗 لینک سیستم پرامپت برای درست کردن عکس @rezasaadplus
🔥3
توی این کانال در مورد هوش مصنوعی صحبت میکنم : @rezasaadplus
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rezasaad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رضاصاد” (@rezasaad), 1,827 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezasaad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.