Channel
@rezabayat_graphic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
823subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002438535379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rezabayat_graphic |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rezabayat_graphic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:40 | 823 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 823 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
119 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 69.7% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 18.5% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 7.56% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.52% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2025 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
شاید زندگی همیشه بهترین کارتهارو در اختیارت قرار نداده باشه، اما برنده بودن همیشه با داشتن بهترین کارتها رخ نمیده!! https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVOyJEQjYyT/?igsh=MWJkaHNvcGwzbm9sMw== شبتون بخیر!
👏9
وقتی چالش سوم توکلی ها شروع شد با موضوع لانگ فرم، من نه افترافکت بلد بودم نه سیستم مناسب لانگ فرم داشتم ( هنوزم ندارم 😐 ). ولی از همون لحظه تو ذهنم جرقه خورد که وقتشه یه فکری بردارم تا افتر افکتو یاد بگیرم ، با معرفی دوستان داخل گروه دورهی دنی حسینی رو خریدم و واقعا راضیام دوره انقدر برام خوب بود که نصفشو دیدم که چالش چهارم با محوریت شرت فرم شروع شد! من هم کمالگرایی رو کنار گذاشتم و با چیزایی که بلد بودم وارد شد…
👍15
بریم برای تجربه نگاری یک شکست!
اقا پدرام عزیز زحمت کشیدن فونت دوره رو عوض کردن فونت کمی نازک تر و خواناتر شد
❤2
File, posted without a caption
❤1
سلام رفقا بعد از چند روز تلاش بالاخره بزرگترین دورهی ساخت برند شخصی رو به فارسی ترجمه کردم! دورهی آقای کالیب رالستون، که شش ساعته و یک دورهی کامل برای ساخت برند شخصیه این ترجمه با دقت زیاد توسط من، اما به کمک هوش مصنوعی ترجمه شده امیدوارم بترکونید! ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Reza Bayat | Linkedin Grow
❤44
قلاب اگه میخواید مشتریها «واقعاً» به شما اعتماد کنن… پشتصحنه بهترین راهه. مشکل مردم قبل از خرید، میخوان صاحب کسبوکار رو بشناسن؛ شخصیتش، صداقتش، پشت کارش. اما توی ویدئوهای رسمی این چیزها دیده نمیشه. راهحل پشتصحنه، واقعیترین نسخه شما رو نشون میده—همون چیزی که اعتماد میسازه. ولی فقط وقتی اثرگذار میشه که درست تدوین بشه؛ تدوین خوب کمک میکنه صداقت شما پررنگتر دیده بشه، نه گم بشه. دعوت به اقدام اگه میخواید…
❤11
پست بعدی یک پست در سبک الهام بخش هست با محوریت تاثیر گذاری بر مشتریان بالقوه در نیچ شما میتونید خودتون جلوی دوربین بیایین و این اسکریپت رو اجرا کنید👇
❤3
Reza Bayat | Linkedin Grow pinned Deleted message
بیایین پیویم و بگید بیشتر چه نوع پستی لازم دارین منتشر کنید تا از همون نوع پست براتون بذارم @Reza_bayat_graphic
❤5
Hook میخوای ادیت ویدئوت بدون استرس، سریعتر و واقعاً حرفهای بشه؟ Problem بیشتر سردرگمیها از اینجا شروع میشه: بدون نقشه میری سراغ ادیت. نتیجه؟ زمان از دست میره، ایدهها گم میشن و چند بار مجبوری از اول شروع کنی. Solution فقط یک کار، همه چیز رو عوض میکنه: استوریبورد. وقتی قبل از ادیت مسیر تصویر، ریتم و پیام رو مشخص کنی، ادیتت هم روانتر میشه هم خروجیاش تمیزتر و حرفهایتر. CTA امشب برای یه ویدیوی ساده یک استور…
❤13
تا چند دقیقه دیگه اولین پست رو منتشر میکنم این پست جنبهی آموزشی داره و مخاطب هدف شما ویدئو ادیتورهایی هستن که توی شبکه شما حضور دارن و برای جذب تعامل بیشتر این پست به کار میاد
🙏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rezabayat_graphic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 351,930 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rezabayat_graphic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reza Bayat | Linkedin Grow” (@rezabayat_graphic), 823 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezabayat_graphic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.