Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رضا محیط رتبه ۴ کنکور تجربی ۱۴۰۴

Channel

رضا محیط رتبه ۴ کنکور تجربی ۱۴۰۴

@reza_zistkonkoor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,513subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003199873023
TypeChannel
Username@reza_zistkonkoor
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/reza_zistkonkoor

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4961,5191,507.510 September 2026 — 1,496 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,496 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,498 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,519 subscribers25 September 2026 — 1,513 subscribers1,51310 September 202625 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,493–1,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:381,513-6
15 Sept 2026, 11:371,519+21
12 Sept 2026, 04:411,498+2
10 Sept 2026, 09:221,496no change
10 Sept 2026, 08:471,496first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 1,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
446
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held19 (29 August 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total8,472
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29m 16s
Average length
14m 38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4848.0%
👍3030.0%
😁1515.0%
🔥44.00%
👎22.00%
👌11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 20:25 UTC213 views15 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

وقتی خسته شدی، فکر کردی دیگه نمیتونی، به این فکر کن!

😁15

9 Sept 2026, 19:16 UTC258 views7 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

#شکلک #فصل۲_زیست_دهم 💯✅ مناسب دانش‌آموزان دهمی، یازدهمی و کنکوری ✍️خیلی تحلیل خوبی شد، حتماً ببینید، اگر زمانش زیاده براتون، توی دو پارت ببینید. توی این ویدیو چند شکل مهم از فصل ۲ دهم رو به صورت ترکیبی طرح کردم. به چند دلیل ۱- این شکل‌ها به خصوص شکل ۱، یه منبع مهم برای آناتومی کلی ارگان‌های بدن هستند که اخیراً خیلی مورد توجه طراح کنکور قرار گرفته ۲- در رابطه با آناتومی اندام‌های دستگاه گوارش هست که خیلی توی کنکورها…

❤7

9 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTC284 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Poll

پاسخ شما؟

  1. گزینه ۱3%
  2. گزینه ۲13%
  3. گزینه ۳67%
  4. گزینه ۴17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥2❤1

9 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC277 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

#تست #فصل۲_زیست_دهم ⁉️ درجۀ سختی: سخت 📚 منبع: آزمون ماز ✍️ تحلیل ویدیویی تست رو انشالله فردا داخل کانال قرار می‌دم @reza_zistkonkoor

❤3

6 Sept 2026, 21:53 UTC347 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Video

#شکلک #پاسخ_تست #تحلیل_ویدیویی #فصل۱_زیست_دوازدهم ✍️ دانش‌آموزانی که از سال قبل با کانال همراه هستن می‌دونن که پارسال یه هشتگی توی کانال داشتیم تحت عنوان #شکلک که در قالب اون، شکل‌های مهم کتاب درسی رو تحلیل می‌کردیم. انشالله امسال هم این کار رو ادامه می‌دیم. توی اولین ویدیو رفتم سراغ شکل مربوط به سطوح ساختاری پروتئین‌ها. در آخر ویدیو تست مربوط به این مبحث که توی کنکور ۱۴۰۵ اومد رو هم حل کردم براتون❤️ اگه این پست بر…

❤3

6 Sept 2026, 19:45 UTC357 views9 reactionsread 10 September 2026

❌❌ ✅ اینم از ویدیوی آفلاین همایش «روش مطالعۀ درس زیست شناسی» لینک دانلود مستقیم https://my.uupload.ir/dl/yoWQ9vDo لینک پخش آنلاین https://my.uupload.ir/p/yoWQ9vDo ✍️ حتماً حتماً اگر توی همایش نبودید، ویدیوی آفلاین رو ببینید. یک ساعت و نیم بیشتر نیست، اما خیلی نکات مهم و خفنی گفته شد و پاسخ سوالاتتون در رابطه با نحوۀ مطالعۀ درس زیست داده شد💯✅❤️ مخصوصا توی پرسش و پاسخ‌هایی که طی جلسه با بچه‌ها داشتیم🔥 لطفاً اگه فکر …

❤9

6 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC431 views4 reactionsread 10 September 2026

💌 بچه‌های عزیز اگر آزمون‌های آرمان رو هنوز ثبت‌نام نکردید حتما ثبت نام کنید. هم کیفتش هم قیمتش عالیه @reza_zistkonkoor

👍2👌1👎1

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC361 views4 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Forwarded from @armanzisPhoto

سلام و درود. ساعت ۶ امروز قیمت آزمون های آرمان به اندازه واقعیشون خواهد رسید و افزایش قیمت خواهیم داشت.

👍4

5 Sept 2026, 21:12 UTC401 views28 reactionsread 10 September 2026

✅💯🔥 خدا رو شکر همایش امروز به خوبی برگزار شد، به نظر خودم خیلی همایش خفنی بود، مخصوصا با پرسش و پاسخ‌هایی که در طی جلسه انجام شد. امیدوارم که دانش‌آموزان عزیز هم رصایت داشته باشن ✍️ می‌خواید فایل ضبط شدۀ جلسه رو برای دانش‌آموزانی که نتونستن شرکت کنن داخل کانال بذاریم؟ @reza_zistkonkoor

👍24🔥2❤1👎1

5 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC372 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026

همایش امروز ساعت ۱۷:۳۰ رو فراموش نکنید💯✅ اگه ثبت‌نام نکردید هنوز، حتماً تا بعدازظهر ثبت‌نامتون رو قطعی کنید. توی یه ساعت و نیم هر آنچه که باید دربارۀ مطالعۀ زیست شناسی بدونید رو بهتون می‌گیم🔥❤️ @reza_zistkonkoor

❤2

4 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC464 views7 reactionsread 10 September 2026

📍 دانش‌آموزان عزیز دهمی، یازدهمی و دوازدهمی، انشالله با همکاری آکادمی هدهد فردا بعدازظهر یه همایش مختصر و خیلی مفید دربارۀ روش درست مطالعۀ زیست برگزار می‌کنیم. 👈 هدفم اینه که توی این همایش با بررسی تیپ سوالات مختلف کنکور به ویژه کنکورهای دو سال اخیر، روش درست مطالعۀ متن و شکل کتاب درسی، نحوۀ اصولی تست‌زنی و تکنیک‌های مختلف اون رو براتون توضیح بدم که توانایی پاسخگویی به همۀ تیپ سوالات رو داشته باشید. به نظرم خیلی هما…

❤7

4 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC746 views3 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

آکادمی هدهد برگزار می‌کند:🕊 همایش «زیست رو حرفه‌ای بخون» 💚 اگه می‌خوای زیست رو اصولی بخونی و حرفه‌ای تست بزنی، این همایش رو از دست نده! ✨ 📅 شنبه ۱۴ شهریور | ⏰ ۱۷:۳۰ 👨🏻‍🏫 با حضور رضا محیط، رتبه ۴ کنکور تجربی 🎯درصد ۹۲ زیست شناسی کنکور 🎁 رایگان برای همه! ✅ برگزاری به صورت آنلاین و حضوری لینک ثبت نام 🤍: https://digiform.ir/c27c71f357 ثبت نام در سایت الزامی می باشد👆🏻🚨 @reza_zistkonkoor

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @reza_zistkonkoor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTCAnonymous Quiz64 voters

پاسخ شما؟

  1. گزینه ۱3%
  2. گزینه ۲13%
  3. گزینه ۳67%
  4. گزینه ۴17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz61 voters

پاسخ شما؟

  1. گزینه ۱13%
  2. گزینه ۲21%
  3. گزینه ۳18%
  4. گزینه ۴48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رضا محیط رتبه ۴ کنکور تجربی ۱۴۰۴” (@reza_zistkonkoor), 1,513 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reza_zistkonkoor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.