4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,792–2,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 10:37
2,798
+3
10 Aug 2026, 20:31
2,795
+2
7 Aug 2026, 21:52
2,793
-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:46
2,794
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
161 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
77
47.8%
❤
69
42.9%
👍
11
6.83%
💯
3
1.86%
❤🔥
1
0.621%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 9 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @revit_in. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 March 2026 to 26 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Важные события, за время моего отсутствия я провела две встречи совместно с предпринимателями из сообщества Росмолодежи
Мы поговорили про дизайн интерьера, про особенности работы дизайнером интерьера, про рынок, про страхи предпринимателей перед стройкой
Знаете что я подумала ??
Что очень хочу встречаться так с вами, создать сообщество в спб дизайнеров интерьера для профессиональных встреч,роста, обменом опыта и …
Трепетно возвращаться к вам после 2,5 месяца тишины
За 4 года ведения этот блог стал частью меня, моего пути, развития и новых возможностей
Причем в телеграмме у нас с вами случился настоящий метч, больше живого общения, полезной информации и новых знакомств ❤️
Этот перерыв был мне очень необходим, кто-то писал и скучал по общению и контенту, я все видела 💔
Но детокс, это как часть публичного пути, для того что б…
Сегодня, в честь своего дня рождения, хочу поделиться с вами закулисьем проекта: «Егубова.образование»
В этом году исполнилось ровно 3 года, как я занимаюсь этим проектом, число записанных уроков на платформе давно перевалило за 100, количество людей которые доверились мне и пришли на курс или купили мини продукты перевалило за 170 человек
Со многими участниками курса я общаюсь, нахожусь на связи, даже успели пораб…
Как одна консультация принесла мне сотрудничество длиной в 2 года
➰Эта история долго оставалась за кадром, но принесла мне большой опыт работы и помогла мне продолжить заниматься любимым делом ➰
История из 2022 года.
Я застала себя в ситуации, когда не понимала, куда мне двигаться дальше, куда развиваться, какой вектор выбрать, как дизайнеру интерьера🗓️
Одно решение открыло для меня новые возможности 🗝️
Я поняла,…
Частый запрос с которым я сталкиваюсь на консультациях: "не разбираюсь в строительных конструкциях и инженерных сетях, боюсь ошибиться при демонтаже или переноске коммуникаций"
Поэтому я решила собрать всю информацию в видео-лекциях о конструкциях многоквартирных домов, несущих стенах, этапах проектирования, разделах рабочей документации и т.д для дизайнеров интерьера🤩
Только самая ценная информация которая нужна …
Я решила выйти на новый уровень в своей работе 🤩
Это решение коснулось всех сфер моей деятельности: дизайна интерьера, обучающего проекта и решений, которые я принимаю
Что изменилось?
Это круто повлияло на всё вокруг Обратную связь я получила сразу от всех:
Клиенты (и новые, и старые)
Участники курса (делилась отзывами тут )
Этот год в школе посвящен новым продуктам, новому подходу и новым вершинам:
Главный фокус:…
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Подготовка к проекту дома 🤔
Так как я знала, что дом из бруса придет ко мне через год на проектирование, я начала серьезно готовиться и вспоминать архитектурную базу для работы
А это я обожаю, даже руки чешутся сесть проектировать дома и чертить узлы, как и 5 лет назад работая в архитектуре. Рассматриваю проекты АР и обычно вникаю, как там все разработано 🤩
Поднимаю архитектурную базу в Revit и создаю красоту с по…
Один материал, два разных подхода к строительству и проектированию:
Два разных подхода, с которыми я столкнулась при проектировании интерьера в домах из бруса
Дано: дома из бруса 🏠
Ситуация 1: Дом на этапе фундамента
Ситуация 2: Закрыли теплый контур дома
Ситуация 1. Пришел клиент с запросом на разводку электрики в проекте: только расположение розеток с минимальным включением в проект и планировочное решение
Пров…
🔥7❤5
Signed Юлия Архитектор-дизайнер
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @revit_in. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 26 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,053,501 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WELCOME REVIT” (@revit_in), 2,798 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revit_in.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
