6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,478–6,504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:44
6,481
-12
14 Aug 2026, 00:54
6,493
-6
10 Aug 2026, 12:12
6,499
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:56
6,500
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:00
6,501
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:48
6,501
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 6,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
22 (11 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
30,565
Reactions total
1,313
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,131 reactions across 22 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,382
64.9%
👍
464
21.8%
👏
107
5.02%
😢
37
1.74%
🔥
32
1.50%
🤬
26
1.22%
💯
14
0.657%
🤡
12
0.563%
💩
10
0.469%
👎
9
0.422%
👌
8
0.375%
🥰
7
0.328%
🌚
5
0.235%
🤣
5
0.235%
😡
4
0.188%
🤔
3
0.141%
🎉
1
0.047%
👻
1
0.047%
😁
1
0.047%
😱
1
0.047%
2 further kinds
2
0.094%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @revistahegemonia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Literalmente en medio a un terremoto y con el pueblo-nación colombiano lidiando con las consecuencias de la catástrofe, el nuevo régimen de Abelardo de la Espriella se ocupa en cuestiones que le interesan a Israel.
El buen observador no necesita muchas explicaciones para entender qué pasa aquí. Al igual que en Argentina, en Colombia el nuevo régimen no vino a ocuparse de la gente del país. Vino a inclinar la cancha …
Canta la posta el monseñor García Cuerva en oración a San Cayetano en este día:
“San Cayetano, aquí está tu pueblo. Un pueblo cansado de promesas incumplidas y dirigentes que hablan de los pobres, pero no están cerca de sus necesidades y se dan la buena vida.
“San Cayetano, aquí está tu pueblo. El que no quiere resignarse a que el trabajo sea una mercancía y que sea necesario tener dos o más empleos para llegar a f…
La definición más acabada de jugador de toda la cancha. Cuando la patria llama, él se pone. No especula, no teme ni ofende: se pone nomás como corresponde.
Gracias, compatriota Martínez. Ud. es un buen criollo, un americano bien nacido.
Dios y la Virgen de Luján lo bendigan.
Con la grieta y poco más están logrando instalar en una década larga todo el andamiaje legal del neocolonialismo. Hacen pelear a los argentinos los unos contra los otros por ideología para que ni siquiera los consensos básicos estén. Una vez destruida la capacidad del pueblo para defender lo que le es propio, abren la puerta para el que de afuera entre a saquear.
En este adelanto de la 101ª. edición de Hegemonía ver…
Alguien dice que esto no es cierto, que Milei hizo todo lo opuesto a lo que prometió. Pero esa es una lectura equivocada. Milei no dice a quien le prometió y ahí está la clave.
Sí, le prometió un montón de cosas, fantasías, al pueblo: ser un país de primer mundo, ser una potencia mundial, cobrar salarios en dólares, etc. Pero son fantasías y solo un otario pudo creer que algo de eso iba a pasar.
Las promesas que Mi…
Hace tiempo veníamos viendo que la grieta iba a joder al país y llegó el día. Gracias a la grieta hay una gran cantidad de gente militando por las modificaciones que el régimen mileísta pretende introducir a la ley de tierras.
¿Por qué? ¿Acaso lo hacen porque están de acuerdo con la extranjerización del territorio argentino? No, ni piensan en eso y a lo mejor les da igual. No tienen ni idea en verdad. Lo hacen porqu…
¡Aquí está la número 100! Aparece hoy la 100ª. edición de nuestra Revista Hegemonía, una edición muy esperada por lo simbólico de llegar hasta aquí habiendo recorrido un largo camino, el atento lector junto a nosotros, desde febrero de 2018 al presente.
Ud. puede ver esta 100ª. edición aquí:
https://revistahegemonia.com/revista-digital/
En esta edición analizamos lo que realmente quedó de aquella campaña de difamac…
El nuevo portavoz del régimen mileísta tiene cierta habilidad en enroscar al zurdaje en discusiones berretas que son callejones sin salida óptimos para embarrar el debate. La pedorrada del momento es la polémica sobre la cantidad de extranjeros estudiando gratuitamente en la UBA.
El señor Ravier dice que ahí hay como un 40% de estudiantes extranjeros en Medicina, la UBA sale a decir que eso no es cierto y el debate …
Algunas cosas ocurren en diferido para que no sean demasiado obvias. Por ejemplo, tras la crisis de 1962 Kennedy tardó seis meses en cumplir lo pactado con Moscú respecto a los misiles Júpiter instalados en Turquía. Si Kennedy los retiraba inmediatamente en octubre de 1962 iba a quedar evidente que había vendido a un aliado.
Seis meses después, entonces, los misiles fueron retirados de Turquía sin que los turcos sin…
El liberalismo no es simplemente un proyecto político como cualquier otro. El liberalismo es pecado porque sus consecuencias últimas no son compatibles con la dignidad o con la propia existencia humana.
Y al ser el hombre la creación divina, cualquier ideología que resulte en su destrucción se califica naturalmente como pecado.
El liberalismo puede venir por izquierda o por derecha. Por izquierda, el liberalismo se…
Ud. probablemente leerá lo siguiente como una contradicción, aunque no la hay. Esta es la única manera de que haya democracia. Para que la democracia exista no puede haber elecciones.
La contradicción no es tal, pero está instalada en su conciencia tras un largo periodo de exposición a la colonización pedagógica. A largo de décadas el sistema convenció a Ud. de que la democracia es un sistema electoral.
O al menos …
Desde tiempos inmemoriales el deporte tiene la propiedad de poner en visibilidad hechos sociales que de otra forma habrían quedado ocultos a la vista de las mayorías.
En los juegos de olímpicos de Berlín 1936 el estadounidense Jesse Owens ganó la medalla de oro en los 100 metros llanos, que es el evento olímpico más importante.
Claro, un negro campeón olímpico en plena Alemania nazi. Es fuerte por todo lo que poten…
❤74👏18👍12🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @revistahegemonia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,064,678 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hegemonía” (@revistahegemonia), 6,481 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revistahegemonia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
