Channel
Revista Costos - Suplemento técnico
@revistacostos
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,748subscribers
+94 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001894722353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @revistacostos |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/revistacostos |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:51 | 2,748 | +7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:40 | 2,741 | +2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 2,739 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 2,734 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 2,730 | +3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:29 | 2,727 | +4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 2,723 | +4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 2,719 | +6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 2,713 | +11 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 2,702 | +16 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 2,686 | +20 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 2,666 | +10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:30 | 2,656 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 2,656 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 2,654 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@aportes_ing_civil · 22,594
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 September 2026
@MundoIngenieria1 · 27,222
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 September 2026
@Ingenieriacivilperu · 19,787
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 1 October 2026
@cursocivil · 20,471
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 29 September 2026
@seismicisolation · 21,472
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Revista Costos - Suplemento técnico” (@revistacostos), 2,748 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/revistacostos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.