Even while I'm on vacation, your messages keep coming ❤️ Honestly, that's probably the best part of my day. 💵 Someone tells me they finally hit a balance they never thought was possible. Someone says trading has become much easier because they no longer have to spend hours staring at charts.🐂 Everyone has their own story, but seeing your progress is what motivates me to keep going. Thank you for your trust. More…

Channel
REVIEWS | PRO Trader
@reviewsx5trader
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,186subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002082648465 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reviewsx5trader |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reviewsx5trader |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 1,186 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:44 | 1,180 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 1,183 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 1,181 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 1,182 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 1,188 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 1,190 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 1,193 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 1,197 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 1,198 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 1,198 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
These messages are about much more than just money.💰 For someone, the first $50 is already a huge achievement. 🛫Someone finally stopped being afraid of every trade. Someone realized that trading doesn't have to take over your whole day. Everyone starts from a different place, but seeing your progress is honestly one of the best parts of what I do. Thank you for trusting me 💪
Sitting here having dinner, and messages like these keep coming in ❤️ Honestly, it feels especially good to receive them while I’m on vacation. One person says they made around $100 in a week. Another says their balance has grown by about $300 in two weeks 💼 But what they both value most is the same thing: they don’t have to spend hours watching the market or worrying about every trade. ‼️That’s exactly why copy …
Messages like these always make me smile. 🤝 Some people were afraid to start at first. Some are already seeing steady results. Others are simply enjoying the fact that they don't have to sit in front of the charts all day. Everyone has their own journey, and I'm genuinely happy to be a part of it.↗️ Thanks for trusting me. ❤️ 💼 Reviews | 🛬 Telegram |📚 LRN
I always enjoy reading your messages.🔼 💰 Some people share their first profits, others send screenshots after a few months, and some are just happy that trading has finally become part of their daily routine. Thank you for sharing your journey with me. It's really great to see your progress. 🤝🔥
I always read every message you guys send me🚀 ⭐ Honestly, seeing your progress is one of the best parts of what I do. Some people celebrate their first $100. Others tell me they finally made more in a month than they ever thought they could. And some are simply happy because trading finally started making sense. Everyone has a different starting point, and that's completely normal.☀️ Thanks to everyone who shares…
‼️ I got a video today from one of the people using my copy trading. She said: "Marco, I started with just $100 last Tuesday... and today my balance is already $696." Messages like this always make me smile. But a couple of hours later she texted me again. She simply opened her account to check the balance... $753. 🐂 🕯 This is exactly why I like copy trading. You don't have to spend all day watching charts or try…
❤1
Even though I was busy all weekend, one thing never changes. My inbox keeps filling up every day. I always try to read your messages whenever I get a free minute.🚀 Here are just a few of your recent reviews 🤝 👍 The trading session starts in just a couple of hours. If you've been thinking about joining us, now's a great time to get started. Just send me "START" 👉 @marco_X5_trader 🛬 Telegram | 💬 Marco | 💼 Reviews
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @reviewsx5trader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@centuria · 37,659
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REVIEWS | PRO Trader” (@reviewsx5trader), 1,186 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reviewsx5trader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.