Channel
@reviewsssww
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003253177402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reviewsssww |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 2 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reviewsssww |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 67 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 67 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5438258053705133939 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5224203240224098867 | 6 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5253753010357561243 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| custom 5368717383517112461 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5253959379241166299 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5256140608447209986 | 1 | 3.13% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 12 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 || Shop for zlatovratsky. pinned «🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤ой график работы :: Чаще всего в этом время я полностью свободен. 🔤 понедельника по пятницу :: 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 субботу :: 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 воскресенье :: 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 По мск.времени. 🔤 другое время мы лишь можем договориться о цене или о том, что вы…»
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤ой график работы :: Чаще всего в этом время я полностью свободен. 🔤 понедельника по пятницу :: 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 субботу :: 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 воскресенье :: 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 По мск.времени. 🔤 другое время мы лишь можем договориться о цене или о том, что вы от меня хотите. Но,к заказу приступлю лишь к назначенему времени. 🔤асчёт покупки нфт и тп :: 🔤🔤🔤 не продам нфт , если вы торгуетесь , поэтому , ниже фиксированно…
custom 54382580537051339397custom 52242032402240988674custom 52537530103575612434
:: Напоминаю.
:: Новый рт и вп пост, тк меня могут забанить.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤т данный пост. 🔤🔤🔤орог🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤азовое дни + рейд/скам/хейт. 🔤итайте внимательнее условия.
🔤:: 🔤щешь шоп с более выгодными ценами и отзывами🔤 🔤🔤огда тебе к 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🎀🔤 :: 🔤ут тебе могут вытянуть нфт/продать с профиля за рубли и звёзды ⭐️,продать тон и возможно ассортимент будет пополняться. 🔤еперь бегом ко мне покупать нужные вещички🔤🤗
𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 || Shop for zlatovratsky. pinned a photo
05.01.2026 . . . 🌟 этого дня @nfthoup & @HOUP0one больше не ручается за : 1. @Mother_Varandey (id: 5075503509 ) 2. @muoruo (id: 7054241610 ) 3. @Thunderrro (id: 2081267098 ) 🤩 ☺️ричина : успешное окончание стажировки Скама с их стороны не наблюдалось ! Желаю успеха в новых начинаниях ❤️
:: и щас вся моя аудитория отпишется от меня
custom 53687173835171124615custom 52242032402240988672custom 52537530103575612431custom 52539593792411662991custom 52561406084472099861
:: на данный курс повысился , поэтому цена поднимается, возможно.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤ккаунт в геншине. 🔤анг :: 🔤🔤 🔤арант :: 🔤🔤🔤 🔤ервер :: Европа. Цена :: 🔤🔤🔤⭐️/🔤🔤🔤 русских рублей. #АккаунтВГеншине
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🤩 снупик 🤩 100 звезд 🤩 50 звезд 🤩 - 🤩 15 звезд условия участия ✨ подпис на @nfthoup : @reviewsssww : @NFTLingsha +реп спонсору @muoruo 🤩бусты и репосты повышают шанс на выигрыш 🌟🌟🌟 обязательно поучаствуй, сегодня может повезти именно тебе . . . ⏪➖➖➖➖➖⏩
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @reviewsssww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,075,046 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@reviewsssww named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 || Shop for zlatovratsky.” (@reviewsssww), 67 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reviewsssww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.