Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net +149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,080–8,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 17:41
8,267
-2
5 Nov 2026, 11:19
8,269
-3
2 Nov 2026, 08:49
8,272
+5
30 Oct 2026, 06:20
8,267
+3
27 Oct 2026, 12:36
8,264
+9
24 Oct 2026, 17:19
8,255
+9
21 Oct 2026, 21:46
8,246
-5
13 Oct 2026, 05:47
8,251
+8
6 Oct 2026, 19:19
8,243
+20
29 Sept 2026, 16:36
8,223
+23
19 Sept 2026, 09:22
8,200
+5
15 Sept 2026, 08:38
8,195
-1
12 Sept 2026, 03:38
8,196
+3
8 Sept 2026, 02:15
8,193
+4
3 Sept 2026, 06:19
8,189
+5
30 Aug 2026, 16:03
8,184
+22
27 Aug 2026, 20:19
8,162
+6
25 Aug 2026, 04:53
8,156
+50
22 Aug 2026, 01:08
8,106
-6
18 Aug 2026, 19:56
8,112
first reading
Engagement
208 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 8,267 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 208 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
208 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
119,869
Reactions total
2,169
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 00:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,400
Videos
≈9,320
Links
≈1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 114 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,554 reactions across 202 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
1,389
21.2%
😁
1,158
17.7%
👍
779
11.9%
😱
515
7.86%
🤮
457
6.97%
🤡
347
5.29%
🤯
309
4.71%
👎
208
3.17%
😢
206
3.14%
👀
180
2.75%
🔥
179
2.73%
🥴
164
2.50%
😐
119
1.82%
🥰
97
1.48%
🖕
70
1.07%
🤨
68
1.04%
🤷♂
65
0.992%
🗿
62
0.946%
🤔
57
0.87%
🌚
43
0.656%
3 further kinds
82
1.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 208 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,720 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 72 posts held from the last 30 days (2.78%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏎️ В ЖК «Отрадное» товарищ в сомнительном состоянии знатно потрепал нервы всем автомобилистам жилого комплекса, некоторые автомобили также оказались потрепанными. Суммарно гонщик протаранил около 30 автомобилей во дворе. Очевидцы пытались его остановить, бежали за ним, пытались перекрыть ему дорогу, но имущество это не спасло. Финальной точкой в пути стал обычный фонарный столб.
Стражи порядка задержали дебошира, но …
👨⚕️ Москвич настолько поехал кукухой от ревности, что не пустил девушку на прием к врачу и пришел сам, чтобы ей назначили лечение.
Ему не хочется, чтобы даму смотрел мужчина, перезаписаться с девушкой специалисту ума тоже не хватило. Скорую вызывать не хотят, и всё это привело к требованию назначить лечение без присутствия человека.
Показатели коэффициента интеллекта достигли отрицательных значений.
🏰 На Рублевке выставили особняк по цене в ₽5 млрд рублей. В этом скромном поместье имеется даже собственный концертный зал.
Наконец-то нормальные лоты, а то сплошные бабушатники попадаются.
🌱 Коммунальщики района Внуково не отстают от соседей и косят траву рядом с парком «Рассказовка».
В ноябре…
Видимо, чтоб не успело Боровское шоссе зарасти к новому году.
🛬 Кажется, что спустя год можно подвести итоги невероятной сделки по покупке аэропортом Шереметьево аэропорта Домодедово.
Выглядит все весьма печально, надеемся, это временно.
🚘 Незавидная судьба брошенного BMW в районе Зябликово. Не знаем, куда подевался владелец, может, переехал, а может, просто забил, но автомобиль его поедет в утиль. Может, в том числе из-за таких дятлов и повышают постоянно этот самый сбор.
🏛️ В Таганском районе Москвы городские власти заботливо руинят памятник архитектуры XVIII в. в виде усадьбы Морозова. Здание находится на грани того, что его уже невозможно будет отреставрировать (как удобно, наверное, получится), ну а пока там беззаботно может посидеть Союз товаропроизводителей, потому что а где же им ещё сидеть.
Прислал подписчик через бота
👨🎨 Экзистенциальные вопросы детского творчества в ЖК «Одинцово» от ПИК.
Кто такой отмороженный что догадался рисовать на моей машине? )
Либо напишите в лс для мирного решения этой хуйни, либо завтра буду поднимать камеры и писать заявление.
Сегодня сделал фото в метро. Получается, что детская площадка во дворе, это теперь премия? И признак крутости жилья? 🙈 Во времена СССР, каждый МКД(даже «хрущевка») имел на своей придомовой территории детскую площадку, а в каждом квартале (особенно тех, что построены в середине-конце 50х и далее, до конца 80х), в обязательном порядке, строилось 3-4 полноценные школы и 6-8 детских садов. А теперь, получается, «премией…
🚸 Возле метро «Спартак» также ведется непримиримая борьба со здравым смыслом. Да, ошиблись и сделали на кой-то черт тротуар к метро каким-то кругом вместо прямого пути. Ну и что теперь, переделывать, чтобы людям удобно было? Нет, мы будем упорствовать против граждан и понуждать народонаселение ходить буквой «Г». Иначе придется признать, что мы допустили ошибку.
😁17🤬8👍6😱5🤨3
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @reversemoscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МОСКВА СЕГОДНЯ @moskvae · 154,026 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
На МКАДе ДТП МОСКВА @namkade1 · 40,438 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Москва и Москвичи @mos_and_mos · 26,017 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Москва М125 @m125media · 54,144 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
СОСЕДИ Москва @odsosedi_moscow · 20,014 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 October 2026
Квартирный Вопрос Москва МО @kvartv · 99,927 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Москва Новости @msknews24 · 34,418 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
Подслушано Москва @moskva_podslushano · 146,335 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Вечерняя Москва - Новости @vm_daily · 19,269 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 September 2026
MSK1.RU | Новости Москвы | Россия @msk1_news · 115,832 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Москва. Город новостей @tvcmoscow · 19,808 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 September 2026
Москва FM @moskva_fm · 27,672 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Это Москва @etomsk_channel · 18,602 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 October 2026
Новая Москва / ТиНАО @tinao_top · 30,298 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
ВАО ОНЛАЙН МОСКВА @vao_online_mkk · 22,743 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 September 2026
Я❤️Москву @ilove_moscow · 106,377 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Версия @VersiaRu · 28,981 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
ПРОКУРАТУРА МОСКВЫ @moscowproc · 31,155 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
ДТП и ЧП Москва @msk_dtp · 26,346 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Изнанка Москвы” (@reversemoscow), 8,267 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reversemoscow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.