Channel
@reverby
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004416653658 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reverby |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 10 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reverby |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 29 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 30 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 31 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 32 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 32 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 135 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 46.9% | |
| 🕊 | 20 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«الان»… شاید برای همه یک زمان نباشد. ⏳ ما فکر میکنیم همین لحظه، برای تمام جهان یکسان است. اما شاید اشتباه میکنیم. طبق نظریه نسبیت اینشتین، دو اتفاق که برای یک نفر همزمان هستند، ممکن است برای شخص دیگری که با سرعت متفاوتی حرکت میکند، همزمان نباشند. یعنی دو نفر میتوانند به یک واقعیت نگاه کنند… و درباره ترتیب اتفاقها، هر دو درست بگویند. عجیبتر اینجاست: شاید چیزی به نام یک «اکنونِ مشترک برای تمام جهان» وجود …
👍2❤1
شاید چیزی که الان میبینی، واقعاً «الان» نباشه… عجیب به نظر میرسه، ولی مغزت جهان رو مثل یک دوربین ضبط نمیکنه. اون چیزی که میبینی، ترکیبیه از اطلاعاتی که حواس بهش میدن + چیزهایی که مغزت انتظار داره ببینه. یعنی مغزت اول حدس میزنه… بعد واقعیت رو با اون حدس مقایسه میکنه. پس هر لحظهای که تجربه میکنی، در واقع یک بازسازیه. تو جهان رو مستقیماً نمیبینی. تو مدلی رو میبینی که مغزت از جهان ساخته. و اینجاست که سؤ…
❤1🔥1
👌👌
❤3
«تماشای کسی که دوستش داری، ۴۴٪ از درد کم میکنه؛ پس بهجای دارو بهش نگاه کن!» ❤️ اما این جمله دقیق نیست. 🧠 این ادعا از یک پژوهش واقعی آمده، اما در آن مطالعه، افراد هنگام یک درد آزمایشگاهی مشخص با دیدن عکس شریک عاطفیشان کاهش درد نشان دادند؛ نه اینکه عشق بهطور کلی ۴۴٪ هر نوع دردی را کم کند. پژوهشها نشان میدهند حضور، لمس و حمایت عاطفیِ فرد محبوب میتواند تجربه درد را کاهش دهد؛ اما مقدار این اثر ثابت نیست و به شرا…
❤3
شناختن آدمها فکر میکنم ما هیچوقت نمیتونیم یک آدم رو بهطور کامل بشناسیم؛ چون انسانها همیشه در حال تغییرن و هر موقعیت، بخش جدیدی از شخصیتشون رو نشون میده. شاید شناختن آدمها دو مرحله داشته باشه. مرحلهی اول، قبل از جدی شدن رابطهست؛ وقتی هنوز توقع و مسئولیت خاصی بین دو نفر نیست و آدمها راحتتر خودشون هستن. تنها رابطهی من هم همینطور شروع شد. اولش اصلاً دنبال رابطه نبودم و اون شخص برای من فقط یک دوست و آشنا…
👍4❤1
ولی واقعیت زندگی اینه که تمام روزهای سختی که فکر میکردیم نمیگذره ،گذشت. تمام تلخی هایی که گمون میکردیم موندگاره، از یادمون رفت. همه شب های سیاهی که طلوع خورشید برامون آرزو بود، روز روشن رو بغل کردن. ما از اتفاق های بد زیادی عبور کردیم،آدم هایی که هم مسیرمون نبودن رو از دست دادیم و تیکه هایی از خودمون رو براشون جا گذاشتیم، زنده موندیم و به زندگی ادامه دادیم و هنوز هم میگذریم ،زنده میمونیم و ادامه میدیم.
❤3💔2
در بی حوصلهترین، کلافهترین، کم صحبتترین، اجتماع گریزترین و دل گرفتهترین ورژن خودمم.
❤3👍2
رک بگویم از همه رنجیدهام از غریب و آشنا ترسیدهام بی خیالِ سردی آغوشها من به آغوش خودم چسبیده ام. - فریدون مشیری
🕊3❤2
بعضی چیزها قرار نیست برگردند؛ قرار است نبودنشان را یاد بگیری.
❤2🕊2❤🔥1
خوابهایی که فقط یک نفر خوابشان ندیده گاهی دو نفر ادعا میکنند که در یک شب، خوابهایی بسیار شبیه به هم دیدهاند. نه فقط یک موضوع مشترک؛ گاهی یک مکان، یک آدم، یک اتفاق یا حتی ادامهی یک داستان. به این پدیده معمولاً رویای مشترک (Mutual Dreaming) گفته میشود. البته علم هنوز آن را بهعنوان ارتباط واقعی بین دو ذهن تأیید نکرده. شباهت خوابها میتواند از خاطرات مشترک، نزدیکی عاطفی یا حتی بازسازی حافظه بعد از بیدار شدن ن…
❤3👍1
تو بیا مست در آغوش من و دل خوش دار مستیات با بغلت هر دو گناهش با من.
❤4🕊1
اگه پارتنر دارید برنامه Between رو نصب کنید تا با پارتنرتون یه برنامه مخصوص داشتید باشید. این برنامه برا شما و پارتنرتونه و بجز اون با هیچکس نمیتونید چت کنید. حالا این برنامه تعداد روزای رابطتتون رو میشماره. روز پریود دوست دخترتونو ثبت کنید بهتون قبلش یاداوری میکنه. رو تولد یا هر روز مهم رو بهتون میگه بهش عکس میدید و آخر هر ماه عکسا رو میزاره کنار هم و یه آلبوم براتون درست میکنه. میتونید برای هم یادداشت و نامه ب…
❤2🕊2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reverby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Echo” (@reverby), 29 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reverby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.