Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РетроГРАД

Channel

РетроГРАД

@retrograd_tg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,219subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002811427794
TypeChannel
Username@retrograd_tg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/retrograd_tg

Growth

10,21910,24710,2337 August 2026 — 10,247 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,241 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,235 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,231 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,219 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,215–10,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:3410,219-5
14 Aug 2026, 16:3610,224-4
13 Aug 2026, 06:5410,228-3
12 Aug 2026, 04:4310,231-6
11 Aug 2026, 02:0810,237+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:1110,235-6
9 Aug 2026, 02:2110,241-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:2410,244-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:0110,247first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 10,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held33 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total39,689
Reactions total3,064
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
49s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,064 reactions across 32 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍99132.3%
🔥84127.4%
76024.8%
😢1424.63%
🎉1203.92%
😁702.28%
🤯431.40%
🤝401.31%
🥰210.685%
🕊200.653%
👌160.522%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,064reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 32 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @retrograd_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC632 views76 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Привет из Куйбышева! Передвижная столовая Куйбышевнефти, которая использовалась для организации питания на буровых @retrograd_tg

👍4021🔥12🕊1🤝1🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC887 views54 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

ПЕРВЫЙ РЕЙДЕР Сегодня поговорим про человека, которого нередко именуют «Первый самарский рейдер». Знакомьтесь, Василий Михайлович Сурошников. Он был одним из сыновей Михаила Сурошникова и вместе с братьями продолжал развивать семейные предприятия. Василий окончить гимназию так и не смог. Настоящим и единственным его учителем всегда был старший товарищ и кумир купец Антон Николаевич Шихобалов, на дочери которого он п

🔥20🤯15😢10👍43🤝2

14 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,030 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Попалась фотография первого выпуска Куйбышевской школы №16 (10-й А), 1940 год. Пара слов про фото. Про возраст учеников уже писал вот тут, не буду повторяться. Что касается того, что выпускной класс десятый - это нормально. В 1940 году средняя школа была с 8 по 10 класс. Ну и сама школа, конечно-же. На втором фото процесс строительства. Внимательные читатели могут вспомнить, что храм знаний стоит на фундаменте друго

19👍17🔥10🥰2🕊1🤝1

14 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,090 views87 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вчера я вам обещал рассказать про самоубийство (или все-таки убийство) господина Ротмана. Начнем с прессы, газета «Голос Самары» №127 от 18 июня 1904 года: Вчера, в 3 ч. дня. на немецком кладбище был найден труп владельца кирпичного завода Густава Богдановича Ротмана. Осмотром трупа установлено самоубийство, которому, как выяснилось, предшествовали следующие обстоятельства. Покойный Ротман прошел на кладбище, как го

36👍34🔥9🤯4🥰3🤝1

13 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,110 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Я, как-то раз уже упоминал универсальный магазин Христензена (Куйбышева, 95). Особенностью магазина было то, что в его ассортименте было представлено большое количество разнопланового товара, что было очень свежо. Магазины, как правило, имели четкую специализацию. Нет, были конечно двойные или тройные магазины, как наш любимый "Пулька и Шпулька", но все-таки большинство специализировалось на чем-то одном. А вот Христ

🔥30👍167😁2👌1🤯1

13 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC≈1,190 views98 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

РетроГРАД снова с вами, и мы продолжаем разбираться с тайной «Печи завода Ротмана». Мы теперь знаем, кто такой Ротман и где находился его завод. И вот тут загвоздочка, ведь завод был там, где ныне Ладья, а печь аж за Студеным оврагом. Значит это не остатки завода? Нет, не остатки завода. На месте завода в 1929 году построили силикатный завод. Собственно, тогда Аннаевский овраг стал Силикатным. Что же за печь тогда?

🔥58👍2313🤯2🤝1😁1

12 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,220 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Билеты на лекцию 3 сентября проданы. Действует лист ожидания, на случай отказов. Запись в лист ожидания доступна по телефону бронирования: +79649780407 @retrograd_tg

16👍9🔥8😢1

12 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,280 views70 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Я тут еще чертежи отыскал. Классно все таки, что до революции выходили архитектурные альманахи с чертежами строящихся в стране зданий. Благодаря им можно найти много старинных чертежей. А в данном случае даже первоначальный проект получилось отыскать. Значит так, на первой картинке первоначальный, а на двух других окончательный проект Собора Христа Спасителя А тут единственная сохранившаяся фотография главного колок

👍41🔥216🥰1😢1

12 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,370 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ну что же, дорогие мои, настало время пролить свет на это темное и запутанное дело. Если что, это я про «Печь завода Ротмана». Сейчас вас введет в курс дела Константин Головкин. Константин, вам слово: Завод Ротмана В начале 1900-х годов на берегу Волги в конце лесных пристаней и в соседстве с мельницей Шадрина предприимчивый немец господин Ротман устроил завод силикатного белого кирпича. Вернее, в 1886-1887 годах з

🔥42👍2613😁4👌1

11 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,410 views114 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Чуть дальше Студеного оврага стоит «Печь завода Ротмана». Каких только легенд с этой печью не связано. Самая безобидная версия – это остатки завода Ротмана, который стоял в этих местах. Самая отбитая – это крематорий, который использовали местные жители. Специально для приверженцев «крематорной версии», я публикую фото аж с восемью такими «крематориями» в одном месте 😱😱😱 Не пугайтесь, шутка, это не крематорий) Завтр

👍5537🔥18👌2🤝2

11 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC≈1,380 views87 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем рассказ про "нелегкий" быт иностранных послов и сотрудников дипмиссий, размещенных в Куйбышеве: 18 декабря 1941 года, для иностранцев был открыт специализированный промтоварный магазин, на улице Куйбышева, 72. Вскоре распахнул для них двери и «закрытый» гастроном. Чтобы прочие горожане не сильно расстраивались, глядя на широкий для военных времен ассортимент, его окна были выкрашены белой краской. Вход в

👍42😁18🤯118🔥7🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈1,350 views183 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ровно год назад, 10 августа 2025 года в 21:40 вышел первый пост на канале РетрГРАД. За год мы достигли фантастических результатов. Канал в ТГ набрал больше 10 000 подписчиков и внесен в реестр Роскомнадзора. Страница ВК развивается очень быстро и уже перешла рубеж 5 000 подписчиков. И все это благодаря вам, друзья. Спасибо вам, что остаетесь с нами, читаете и поддерживаете нас. Обещаем, что дальше все будет еще более

87🎉49🔥27👍15🤝4🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @retrograd_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 264,278 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РетроГРАД” (@retrograd_tg), 10,219 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/retrograd_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.