9 measurements spanning 25 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,323–1,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Sept 2026, 21:35
1,324
-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:38
1,325
-2
24 Aug 2026, 14:34
1,327
-1
21 Aug 2026, 06:12
1,328
-2
18 Aug 2026, 02:03
1,330
+1
14 Aug 2026, 22:06
1,329
-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:52
1,332
-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:30
1,334
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:23
1,334
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
39s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
247 reactions across 5 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
63
25.5%
❤
49
19.8%
👏
37
15.0%
🔥
34
13.8%
😁
25
10.1%
💯
18
7.29%
👍
12
4.86%
🤷♂
3
1.21%
💘
2
0.81%
🤗
2
0.81%
🗿
1
0.405%
🥱
1
0.405%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 5 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @restikinoliki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2026 to 14 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Телеграмм-канал Трапезник, «мастер» нативной рекламы про рестораны в шкуре инсайдера и гастроэксперта разместил заказ московского ресторана «Северяне», где утверждает, что съел лучшие сморчки в своей жизни, которые он обожает. Увы, но очередной московский ресторан (экономия 1000 рублей с кг грибов) впаривает безвкусную сморчковую шапочку под видом сморчка, а это два разных гриба, отличающихся по вкусу и биологически.…
Лето начинается с шикарной новости! Один из любимых питерских шефов Павел Демин (Meal, Mill) вместе с Артуром и Зарой Берсировыми (можете знать их по Nude на Патриках и бургерам Bumo и, особенно, Sight на Чкаловской) взяли звезду Мишлен!
Их Boreal буквально за год очаровал Хельсинки, а теперь стал лишь 1 из 6 звёздных ресторанов столицы Финляндии.
Посмотрел, пока что только на месяц вперёд забронирован. Так что есл…
Как за пару лет со всеми потрохами продаются "беспристрастные и независимые правдорубы"?
Какой-то сюр: вчера светская Москва гуляла на ДР тг канала (!) "Пикник в Купчино"Трапезник. Сосисками в тесте видимо кормили в обмен на репосты от разных накрученных 30-50 тыс тг каналов, ведь у всех текст по одной методичке про "беспристрастного и независимого", виновника торжества. Некоторые зачем-то писали, что автор скрывает…
Ксения Анатольевна - настолько занятой человек, что для "наводки" в лучший ресторан мира на другом конце света ей требуется чета Зарьковых.
Поехали они кстати с Борисом в Перу не просто так. Поплывут в настоящий инфоцыганский круиз. Там прям один спикер инфоцыганистее другого. Не хватает только тех, кто уже и так сидит за мошенничество, отмывания или неуплату налогов. Вообще уже, если честно, давно не понимаю: Борис…
🤣33❤2💘2🤗2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @restikinoliki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Трапезник @trapeznick · 40,214 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Zarkov Live @BorisZarkovTM · 37,183 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026
В Питере есть @spb_rest · 76,534 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рестики-Нолики” (@restikinoliki), 1,324 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/restikinoliki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
