Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for respectfully, hug

Channel

respectfully, hug

@respectfullyhug

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002193551441
TypeChannel
Username@respectfullyhug
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/respectfullyhug

Growth

525553.520 August 2026 — 52 subscribers21 August 2026 — 55 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54 subscribers5420 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 07:5854-1
21 Aug 2026, 00:2355+3
20 Aug 2026, 02:1552first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
725.9%
avg views ÷ 54 subscribers
Avg views / post
392
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held12 (9 June 202618 August 2026)
Views total1,176
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10283.6%
❤‍🔥108.20%
🍓75.74%
21.64%
💘10.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,030 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

фандомная битва в самом разгаре, а у моего миди наконец-то произошел деанон, так что делюсь и тут тоже! читать на ао3 фантазия на тему знакомства сайласа с надин + Старший Брат Норман Эшли™ + борьба профессионализма и предвзятости + о том, что общего между одержимым и нечистью + возможно, демон, но это не точно 🤫 #какпойматьмонстра

10

5 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC75 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

нишевая активность последних дней: window shopping для фэнтези аушки выше (у меня нет фантазии мне нужно чем-то ВДОХНОВИТЬСЯ чтобы это описать)

8

4 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC71 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026

буквально за пару дней прослушала сборник эссе (или мемуары, как их называет сам автор) харуки мураками "о чем я говорю, когда говорю о беге" он определенно попался мне в нужный период времени – как раз когда я начала выстраивать свои отношения со спортом и параллельно возвращаться к творчеству несмотря на название, мураками пишет далеко не только о беге. для него бег и писательство переплелись достаточно естествен

7❤‍🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC74 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026

как обычно интереснее и прикольнее всего продумывать детали мира, расставлять фигурки на шахматную доску, размышлять о мотивации, о символах, выдумывать хлесткие реплики для диалогов, а писать как-то сложно, но я стараюсь!! два месяца уже не трогала фактически ничего по-серьезному, ни к чему душа не ложится так, как хочется может и эту идею заброшу, но пока мне нравится о ней думать, а это уже что-то

8❤‍🔥3

30 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC66 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

потратила выходной на идею, которую разгоняла вчера в комментариях под постом выше в идеале это должна быть серия ваншотов, объединенных одной ау, но пока мне бы хоть один написать 🫩🫩

9❤‍🔥32

29 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC68 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026

у меня уже недели 2 душа просит какой-то фэнтезийной истории, и я виню в этом ателье колпаков 😔😔

9

29 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC65 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026

окей, окей, принц и его верный меч, поклявшийся защищать его ценой жизни, i get it, но послушайте, а что насчет ДВУХ рыцырей?? выросших при дворе и души не чаявших в их дорогом принце?? принесших клятву в один и тот же день, в присутствии друг друга, приклонив колено перед лицом своего короля?? осознающих, что с этого дня – хотя, конечно, задолго до этого, возможно, с самого момента их рождения – их жизни им не прин

12🍓4

22 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC82 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

с каким лицом я иду смотреть одну из самых стеклянных арок ван писа, вообще не оправившись от предыдущего дропа ангста:

8

13 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC118 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

girlhood is a spectrum поэтому в один день ты получаешь диплом, а в другой едешь смотреть на альпак и трогать траву у меня дикий неписун, но я участвую в фандомной битве за фд монстра, и там будет штука, которую я писала еще в мае (как будто знала, что потом будет не до этого) визитку нашей команды можно заценить тут, она крайне классная и смешная вышла!! параллельно тыкаю пару других идей, но пока ничего серьезно

9❤‍🔥2🍓1💘1

9 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC125 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ну и в тему к этому: мне тут попалось сразу несколько видео-эссе на ют о том, как изменилась культура фандомов за последние несколько лет и как одно из самых грустных явлений это как раз отмирание культуры комментирования под фанфиками :( по моим ощущениям комментарии и раньше были роскошью, а теперь и вовсе стали чем-то, чего даже не ждешь особо, и я даже по себе заметила, что перестала комментить под работами люде

10🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @respectfullyhug. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 638,669 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“respectfully, hug” (@respectfullyhug), 54 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/respectfullyhug.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.