Channel
@resistance_channel
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,208subscribers
-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001192079756 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @resistance_channel |
| Created | 2 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/resistance_channel |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @resistance_channel/845 · this entry9 Mar 2025, 21:32 UTC | @resistance_news/305219 Mar 2025, 21:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @resistance_channel/849 · this entry6 Apr 2025, 13:33 UTC | @resistance_news/305286 Apr 2025, 13:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @resistance_channel/851 · this entry13 Jun 2025, 15:53 UTC | @resistance_news/3053113 Jun 2025, 15:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @resistance_news | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 December 2024 to 26 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @resistance_channel — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 6,208 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 6,227 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 6,239 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 6,250 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 6,251 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 6,251 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
143 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 126 | 88.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 9.79% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2024 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Americans view us in Lebanon as an obstacle to their projects aimed at extending their dominance over the world's nations and subjugating them. The value of our weapon today—and the insistence on erasing and eliminating it—is not just because it defends Lebanon, but because it has also defended the oppressed beyond our borders. It has encouraged and brought closer the unification of the region’s peoples under th…
❤45👍3👎1
“Here stands unyielding pride—so why pursue submission?” From the ruins of a destroyed home in the southern suburbs of Beirut – 23/07/2006 Same people, a stronger will, and the same destiny, God willing. Assafir Newspaper
❤66👍10👎2
To everyone living outside Gaza who says they feel powerless to change the reality: The truth is, you are not powerless, you are simply not prepared to make the sacrifices required to change it. Sacrifices like giving up your job, leaving life in a foreign country, parting from your family, giving up your wealth, or even risking your life. This, at its core, is why the US holds dominance over the world: there are f…
❤9👍1
We ask God to have mercy on the righteous martyrs and to grant a swift recovery to the wounded and oppressed. This is not a time for analysis, mockery, or pointless disputes. Every free person in our region must reflect deeply, renew their faith in their goals, principles, and convictions, and seek a meaningful and active role—not remain a passive observer of unfolding events. This is essential if we truly see ourse…
❤2
We are a people with principles, and we seek power to preserve and defend these principles. In other words, the purpose of acquiring power is to serve the principles. On the other hand, the world and the global system today pursue power for the sake of instincts that is, for dominance, authority, and wealth. If you have a gun and I have a gun, we talk about the law. If you have a knife and I have a knife, we talk a…
❤1
The nation of resistance in Lebanon cannot regret the historic decision it took to open a supporting front to aid Gaza, starting from southern Lebanon, no matter how great and immense the sacrifices may be. On October 8th, the resistance leadership, headed by our most sacred martyr, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, made the decision to enter a military support front for Gaza, while the entire world sufficed with silence or …
❤1
The Americans view us in Lebanon as an obstacle to their projects aimed at extending their dominance over the world's nations and subjugating them. The value of our weapon today—and the insistence on erasing and eliminating it—is not just because it defends Lebanon, but because it has also defended the oppressed beyond our borders. It has encouraged and brought closer the unification of the region’s peoples under th…
❤2
[English] "The Secrets of the Second Liberation" - Hezbollah in Syria Episode 9
This translation is dedicated to the souls of the martyrs of the Islamic Resistance and to every martyr and family that sacrificed against projects of subjugating the region. Starting tonight, we'll continue to translate the remaining episodes of the series "The Secrets of the Second Liberation" carrying in our hearts the hope that we'll live to witness the 3rd and final liberation: The Liberation of Palestine, God …
Martyr Morteza Avini once said: "The true essence of human perfection manifests in facing hardships... Without this, God would never have tested the believers." Setting aside arrogance, the Zionist aggressions have destroyed the majority of Hezbollah’s military capabilities and much of its jihadist leadership, which had accumulated decades of experience through the honorable, great, and exceptional work of the Islam…
[English subtitles] Part of Sayyed Nasrollah's speech in Al-Quds day 2013 during the hardest phase of the global war on Syria. Note: Amidst the global war on Syria, led by the United States, Israel, the UK, France, and several Arab countries, aimed at fragmenting the region's peoples and engulfing them in sectarian and regional conflicts, and advocating a stateless logic to serve colonial agendas, while Arab leader…
The cost of resistance and steadfastness is always "less" than the cost of submission, bargaining and surrender. Sayyed Hassan Nasrollah - 2019
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @resistance_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 993,404 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Resistance Channel” (@resistance_channel), 6,208 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resistance_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.