Channel
@reshadrahman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001703639788 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reshadrahman |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reshadrahman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 22 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 22 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Twitter @Reshad Rahman The monitoring task had failed 100 consecutive times. Your subscription to the RSS feed has been deactivated. To reactivate it, please use the /activate_subs command. ERROR: HTTP status code error (404 Not Found)
❗️Espanyol’s Sergi Darder has also emerged as an option in midfield, though he isn’t a high priority. @CatalunyaRadio #Transfers 🔵🔎 source
Q&A ⤵️ Q&A ⤵️ source
🚨🚨🗣️ “The Bruno information we gave was not incompatible with the rest. If you want to continue creating war, then go ahead. But we have a good reputation to not have every d*mn piece of information questioned on our channel! The Messi case didn’t go well, but that doesn't mean… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670796202831495169 https://t.co/l6UQlf3JIZ source
☑️ Iñigo Martinez ☑️ Faye ☑️ Vitor Roque ⏳ Gündogan (Decision this week) ❓Pivot ❓Right-back Transfer activity so far. source
❗️Optimism at Barcelona re Gündogan. They expect his response this week. @rac1 #Transfers 🇩🇪 source
Re ❗️More: Saudi is ruled out. Only City, Barça and Arsenal in the race for Gündogan. Club is hopeful, but aware about the strong fight from England. Xavi can be a key factor. @tjuanmarti #Transfers 🇩🇪 source
❗️Newcastle consider Bruno’s contract renewal as a priority. More talks will take place soon. @FabrizioRomano #Transfers 🇧🇷⚪️⚫️ source
🚨 JUST IN: Newcastle have offered €30M + Bruno Guimarães for Raphinha. @gerardromero #Transfers ☎️🔵🔴 source
Mikayil Faye 🤝🔵🔴✅ https://t.co/WHG7vO6GaI source
❗️Pep: “Give Xavi a little time, it took us 8 years to win the UCL. I’m European champion because a striker missed a clear header from 3 yards away. Xavi knows it better than I do - when you win La Liga, you've been the best team. He played group-stages with his defenders… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670752281044881409 https://t.co/YrxFQSodW9 source
🚨 Gündogan: “Barcelona? It’s a beautiful city” #Transfers 🏡 source
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @reshadrahman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reshad Rahman” (@reshadrahman), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reshadrahman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.