Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Velký Resetheus | The Great Resetheus

Channel

Velký Resetheus | The Great Resetheus

@resetheus

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,453subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001664470170
TypeChannel
Username@resetheus
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/resetheus

Growth

2,4532,4672,4607 August 2026 — 2,467 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,467 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,461 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,457 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,453 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,451–2,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:452,453-4
14 Aug 2026, 14:352,457-4
11 Aug 2026, 11:422,461-6
7 Aug 2026, 08:002,467no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:562,467first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
26m 24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

830 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍46255.7%
22126.6%
👏688.19%
🔥222.65%
💯111.33%
🙏111.33%
😁91.08%
👌70.843%
🤬70.843%
🍾40.482%
😢30.361%
👎20.241%
🥰20.241%
🤔10.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @resetheus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2025 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2026, 00:41 UTC≈4,160 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Po téměř šesti letech skončil soudní spor mezi Davidem Šubíkem a portálem Manipulátoři.cz. Příběh začal několika konkrétními žádostmi o informace podle zákona 106/1999 Sb. a skončil rozsudkem s náklady 90 tisíc korun a zásadní otázkou: může být člověk označen za šiřitele dezinformací jen proto, že kriticky analyzuje podklady státních institucí? Nový článek rekapituluje cestu od prvních dotazů na Ministerstvo zdravot

👍34🤬7💯6😢3

25 Apr 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,890 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️NA FAKTECH SKUTEČNĚ ZÁLEŽÍ 🤷‍♀️⚡️ Na webových stránkách a facebookovém profilu známého českého manipulátora a dezinformátora se včera objevil příspěvek s názvem „Šubík, Tarabová a Resetheus: čtyři roky jásotu, odvolání a nakonec pravomocná prohra“. Řízení se skutečně táhlo čtyři roky – jednak kvůli pochybením soudů, jednak kvůli záměrným průtahům, které způsoboval sám Cemper a s nimiž se dokonce veřejně chlubil.

👍40👏64💯4

19 Apr 2026, 15:20 UTC≈7,600 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️JAK ARGUMENTUJE UNIVERZITNÍ PROFESOR A LÉKAŘ⚡️ aneb ⚡️Jaké důkazy pro původce dětské obrny má pan Hematolog?⚡️ Začátkem prosince nás poctila vzácná návštěva. Do diskuze pod naším facebookových příspěvkem ŠUBÍK vs. MANIPULÁTOŘI ze dne 3.12.2025 se zapojil lékař, vědec, univerzitní profesor a vysokoškolský pedagog v jedné osobě - pan Hematolog. Přednáší principy vědeckého myšlení a medicíny založené na důkazech a zn

👍247👏7👌2

3 Apr 2026, 21:15 UTC≈2,230 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️Rozloučení s gravitací a skutečný důvod, proč věci padají⚡️ Je 1. dubna a my se vracíme na Měsíc! Je to také dva roky od vydání mé knihy Bláznova moudrost a 66 let od vůbec první fotografie zeměkoule z vesmíru (1. dubna 1960). Je to také 360 let od Newtonovy hypotézy o všeobecné gravitaci z roku 1666, která je svorníkem, jenž drží pohromadě celý domeček z karet, jímž je moderní fyzika. Dostávám spoustu otázek ohl

👍2911👏4👎2🤔1

22 Feb 2026, 21:30 UTC≈4,030 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️Nový rozhovor Pavla Kamase s Davidem Šubíkem je tady!⚡️ 👉 Sledujte nás 👉 Podpořte nás 👉 Knihy, které mohou zachránit život © #Resetheus #DavidŠubík #PavelKamas #Radix

👍4123👏6🔥2😁2💯1

21 Feb 2026, 13:08 UTC≈3,010 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️7. března:⚡️Těšíme se na Vás na přednášce “Proč je důležité pochopit, že viry nezpůsobují žádné nemoci”. 👉 Třinecký Refresh festival 👉 Sledujte nás 👉 Podpořte nás 👉 Knihy, které mohou zachránit život © #Resetheus #DavidŠubík #RefreshFestival

👍30👏94🔥3

29 Jan 2026, 21:09 UTC≈3,110 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‼️ Výzva pro Romana Kovaříka Pan Roman Kovařík stále věří tomu, že lidé, kteří zemřeli s diagnózou C-19, tímto údajně novým onemocněním určovaným výhradně na zákádě výsledků RT-PCR testů skutečně trpěli. Při příspěvku Davida Šubíka na kovidovém semináři v Poslanecké sněmovně se chtěl 3x někam “potopit.” Navrhujeme proto panu Kovaříkovi, aby se potopil do revize testovacích sad, které se používaly k diagnostikování

38👍28😁7👏2

27 Jan 2026, 13:51 UTC≈10,100 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️David Šubík: Neplatnost PCR testů a chybějící skutkový základ covidových opatření Vystoupení Mgr. Davida Šubíka v Poslanecké sněmovně Parlamentu České republiky na Semináři „Tři roky od covidu – dopady očkování a mimořádných opatření“. Akce se konala pod záštitou poslance Jindřicha Rajchla dne 26.1.2026. 👉 Video na Odysee 👉 Sledujte nás 👉 Podpořte nás 👉 Knihy, které mohou zachránit život © #Resetheus #Covid #Te

👍5322👏10

22 Dec 2025, 02:34 UTC≈4,150 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ PRAVDA O NEMOCI - VIRTUÁLNÍ SUMMIT ⚡️ pro anglicky mluvící

22👍11👏7👌5

17 Dec 2025, 14:53 UTC≈2,930 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Kup dvě knihy Darujeme Ti třetí 💙 🎁 #Resetheus #HIV #DavidŠubík

👍2712🔥2🥰2👏1

14 Dec 2025, 01:34 UTC≈19,900 views70 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡️ SOUDU PROKÁZAL, ŽE COVID TEST BYL PODVOD. MUSÍ ZA TO ZAPLATIT ‼️ Rozhovor s Davidem Šubíkem o aktuální situaci kauzy Albrechtovi vs. FN Plzeň. Dozvíte se skandální informace nejen o stavu české justice, ale také o způsobu, jakým se trestá poškozený, když se mu jako laikovi podaří rozbít kovidový podvod. 👉 Video na Odysee 👉 Sledujte nás 👉 Podpořte nás 👉 Knihy, které mohou zachránit život #resetheus #albrechtovi

👍3820🔥7🍾4👏1

10 Dec 2025, 07:33 UTC≈3,900 views31 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kup dvě knihy Darujeme Ti třetí 💙 🎁 #resetheus #poslednipandemie

👍1410👏4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @resetheus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 821,130 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Velký Resetheus | The Great Resetheus” (@resetheus), 2,453 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resetheus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.