Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крах Вирта

@reservekh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,579subscribers

-115 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003691655151
TypeChannel
Username@reservekh
DescriptionOwn - Gadzilla. Связь - @gkfwwv
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/reservekh

Growth

10,57910,69410,636.57 August 2026 — 10,694 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,672 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,649 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,635 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,604 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,579 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,562–10,711 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:2410,579-25
11 Aug 2026, 09:5210,604-31
10 Aug 2026, 12:3210,635-14
9 Aug 2026, 14:1510,649-23
8 Aug 2026, 11:0610,672-22
7 Aug 2026, 18:3110,694first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 10,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total25,535
Reactions total4,940
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,400
Videos
30
Links
503

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,940 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💩67213.6%
😐59912.1%
🤔50710.3%
🤡4689.47%
😁3897.87%
🌚3697.47%
🤩3467.00%
🤮3316.70%
🔥3106.28%
😎2976.01%
😭1933.91%
😡1302.63%
😨891.80%
🥴891.80%
🤬731.48%
🤓330.668%
300.607%
👏30.061%
20.04%
🍌10.02%
9 further kinds90.182%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,940reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reservekh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC875 views209 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Идиот блять. Думал, я не знаю твоего второго аккаунта? Мол заблокировал и отвязался?..» Мне кажется чел даже не представляет, насколько сильно щас опозорился 🥴 - Что это сейчас было 😡 - Нет, я луи 🤩 - Какой он грозный папочка ✈️Крах Вирта

😡130🥴45🤬18🤩16

12 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,090 views246 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Любеш секс? Как у тебя пэнес? Меня зовут Марина мне 13? Давай сегз?» Иногда в моей голове проскакивают мысли о том, что рофл должен быть смешным, хорошо, что я никогда не приму это 💩 - И это пишет чел с ником господин 🔥 - Марина 13 газззз знакомиться 😐 - По моему в начале не так себя ведут ✈️Крах Вирта

💩137🔥74😐35

12 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,130 views204 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Слушай а когда твою мать будут ногами пиздить, ты тоже предпочтешь это игнорировать» Бля ну девка достойно сравнила конечно, все ровненько 🤡 - Когда у них появится личная жизнь 😎 - У меня хотя бы мать есть 😭 - Так шутить это низко ✈️Крах Вирта

😎111🤡54😭381

11 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,280 views260 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Я тоже хочу, слей на меня, ну звездочки» Бля, я бы слил, его в унитаз 🤩 - Вот бы дать ему по ебальничку 😨 - А еще че ему 😁 - Наглость зашкаливает ✈️Крах Вирта

😁132🤩79😨4711

11 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,430 views270 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Я блять потратил свое время и выбрал именно тебя?!?!? Что за люди пошли, иди нахуй» Только попробуйте отказаться пойти в кф, у них твм естественный отбор 💩 - Когда все конфы уже закроются 🤮 - Да кому оно пиздит щас 🌚 - Если бы меня так в кф пригласили, я бы отказал ✈️Крах Вирта

💩145🌚75🤮4321🍌1👍1💋1

10 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,450 views291 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Привет, станешь моей вирт мамой? Можем спокойно сосаться» Вот так теперь в вирте ищут себе милфочек, возьму с него пример 🤮 - Какого хуя 😭 - Я тоже хочу милфу 🔥 - Инцест дело семейное ✈️Крах Вирта

🔥167🤮73😭501

10 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,450 views267 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Привет скинь очко разорванное» Скажем спасибо, что хоть привет в начале сказали, обычно сразу к делу 🤡 - Она конченная 😐 - И че она хотела 🥴 - Надо было сразу блокнуть ✈️Крах Вирта

🤡167😐53🥴443

9 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,540 views235 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Ну да, какое же я уебище, из за того что у меня детский характер, и что я сам еще ребенок» По моему детская позиция это ненормально, или я ошибаюсь?? 😁 - инфантильность это хуйня брат 😐 - А нахуй ребенку отношения? 🌚 - Он такой капризный омежулька ✈️Крах Вирта

🌚135😐60😁382

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈1,460 views297 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Сегодня нам бы было целых 10 дней, но мы расстались..» Очень трогательная история, жаль девочку, надеюсь запомнит пароль от аккаунта 🤩 - Уже вижу как она в будущем кринжует от себя 🤔 - После этого видео они сойдутся и будут встречаться еще 5 дней 😎 - (Расстались по ее инициативе) ✈️Крах Вирта

😎153🤔75🤩652🔥1🦄1

9 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,410 views249 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Скинь внешку, может дам шанс» Самооценке виртушнки конечно можно позавидовать, да 😐 - В рж он изгой 😭 - Да что оно хочет 🤮 - Скоро мама тел заберет ✈️Крах Вирта

🤮159😐50😭381👏1

8 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,510 views241 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Черт.. Ты возбуждаешь» Начали за здравие, закончили за упокой 🤔 - У него по моему там друг резался 😎 - Ух какой долбаеб 😨 - Каждый раз удивляюсь сколько в вирте шлюх ✈️Крах Вирта

🤔164😨42😎331💯1

8 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,300 views224 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎤«Ты знаешь что буквенный секс повышает iq на 20ед» Ты знаешь, что буквенный секс понижает iq на 40ед 🤔 - Ну если хорошо подумать он долбаеб 💩 - На что люди надеятся, когда такое пишут 😁 - Вот бы огромный метеорит упал на землю ✈️Крах Вирта

🤔120😁61💩412

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @reservekh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 320,250 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крах Вирта” (@reservekh), 10,579 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reservekh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.