Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РЕПТИЛОИДНАЯ

Channel

РЕПТИЛОИДНАЯ

@reptiloidnaya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,776subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001410057016
TypeChannel
Username@reptiloidnaya
Created14 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/reptiloidnaya

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,7762,8062,7917 August 2026 — 2,803 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,803 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,802 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,803 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,806 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,794 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,788 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,782 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,779 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,777 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,781 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,776 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,772–2,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 07:192,776-5
31 Aug 2026, 14:472,781+4
28 Aug 2026, 18:282,777-2
25 Aug 2026, 18:582,779-3
22 Aug 2026, 13:052,782-6
19 Aug 2026, 08:032,788-6
16 Aug 2026, 17:332,794-12
13 Aug 2026, 05:152,806+3
10 Aug 2026, 00:012,803+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:522,802-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:002,803no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:492,803first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 01s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

304 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11638.2%
custom 60330719314087806886120.1%
5518.1%
😁3110.2%
🗿196.25%
🤡113.62%
🤨72.30%
🌚20.658%
😭20.658%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 10 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @reptiloidnaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2026 to 18 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 May 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,400 views23 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну в целом мы практически точно идем по таймлайну Detroit: Become Human. На видео — Origin F1 от AheadForm. Работают над мимикой.

🔥13custom 60330719314087806888🌚2

13 May 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,670 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Биомаркеры Одной из важнейших частей проекта является трекинг медицинских анализов — только с ними картина будет полной. Погрузившись в тему, я обнаружил что задача попросту не решена нигде выше уровня 1 клиники. Лаборатории отдают анализы с разными названиями, в разных единицах измерения, с разными референсными интервалами. Абсолютный хаос. А ведь динамика — это самое важное! Вы спросите: неужели нет никакого ст

🔥225🤨2🗿1🤡1

10 May 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,400 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Они нам это еще припомнят. Android lives matter!

custom 603307193140878068811😁4😭21

8 May 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,620 views91 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Выхожу из стелса! Обычно, когда я забиваю на ведение канала, это значит, что я очень занят чем-то важным. Но обо всем по порядку. Уже много лет я увлекаюсь спортом и биохакингом, и всегда страдал от проблемы отсутствия системы комплексной аналитики здоровья. Штош, настало время ее решить. HOLI — Holistic Oracle for Living Improvement Система, которая отвечает на два вечных вопроса: кто виноват и что делать. Я з

🔥5324🗿9🤨3🤡2

13 Mar 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,040 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хорошей пятницы!

😁21🤡3

12 Mar 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,840 views25 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

В январе запускали еще одно AI-зеркало на 1 Billion Followers Summit в Дубае — на самом большом ивенте в мире посвященном Creator Economy и Social Media. За три дня работы на локации прямо у входа — 3500 интеракций, 18 часов чистого взаимодействия, 1500+ UGC контента. Показывали кучу разного контента: от брендированного по заказу саммита, до AR-фильтров и других приколов. Наблюдение, которое я сделал еще в 2021 с

🔥176🤨2

11 Mar 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,520 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @olya_tashitVideo

Летайте нашими виар-авиалиниями!

custom 603307193140878068817😁42🗿2🤡1

9 Mar 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,720 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рекомендуется к просмотру: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R4BgHwlZWA

10

8 Mar 2026, 15:17 UTC≈2,430 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ну штош. Вот и Матрица подъехала. Без шуток. На видео — не анимация. Это РЕАЛЬНЫЙ мозг мухи, который ПОЛНОСТЬЮ симулируется в компьютере и управляет виртуальным телом. 125 000 нейронов. 50 000 000 синапсов. Все скопировано с живой мухи в симуляцию с высочайшей точностью. Она бегает, ищет еду, и, скорее всего, не понимает, зачем живет. Как и ты, кожаный. На следующем этапе команда Eon обещает отсканировать и засим

custom 603307193140878068822🗿74🤡3

5 Mar 2026, 12:37 UTC≈1,630 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Cooked

🔥113custom 60330719314087806883😁2🤡1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @reptiloidnaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Силиконовый Мешок
@prompt_design · 85,657
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 52,361
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Ai molodca
@strangedalle · 46,847
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РЕПТИЛОИДНАЯ” (@reptiloidnaya), 2,776 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reptiloidnaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.