Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Репендикулярный редакторский лазер-излучатель

@repredlaser

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002184340644
TypeChannel
Username@repredlaser
DescriptionНерегулярный канал с критикой и похвалой чужой работы
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/repredlaser

Growth

258 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:0225no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:4725first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
151
Videos
2
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2244.0%
918.0%
👍510.0%
🙈48.00%
💯36.00%
🔥24.00%
🤔24.00%
🤯24.00%
🌚12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 18 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Mar 2026, 16:08 UTC24 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

М.Видео, наконец, поставило точку в споре между Альфой и всем миром в написании этого сложнейшего термина

😁3

13 Mar 2026, 09:34 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Никогда не могла понять, почему в гугл-доках не убирают разделение на страницы. Оно же уродует док, разрывает тексты, иллюстрации. Вы печатать что ли собираетесь?

😁3

10 Mar 2026, 09:05 UTC34 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, свежие идеи в мире редактуры!

😁3

26 Feb 2026, 10:49 UTC34 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @bponline

Вы получаете одобрение наблюдения продолжения замедления инфляции.

🤯2

26 Feb 2026, 10:49 UTC23 viewsread 11 August 2026

Идеальная иллюстрация канцелярита

24 Feb 2026, 07:10 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Слово «отзыв» неоднозначно можно трактовать. Автор скрина, например, решил, что ему предлагают подключенную услугу отозвать

🤔2

17 Feb 2026, 13:51 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Это какой-то сон при 39 градусах, когда так близко стоят понятия «медиа», «иноагент», «email-маркетолог», «карьера»

😁1

16 Feb 2026, 10:51 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Чем руководствовались дизайнеры Яндекс Недвижимости, когда ставили кнопку ❌ в левом углу? Пользовательский опыт для них что ли шутка какая-то?

👍2

11 Feb 2026, 11:42 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Хочется поругаться и сказать, что это неинформативный и бесполезный пример. Но сложно это сделать, потому что по сути сделано правильно: — прогресс конкретного человека невозможно оценить. Даже если будут даны определённые знания, то не факт, что они усвоятся; — пример с кубиком Рубика просто гениальный, ведь это понятная и всем известная аналогия; — яркие, позитивные, заряжающие иллюстрации. Белый фон, чистые цвета

🔥2

4 Feb 2026, 04:23 UTC30 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

+ одна или две теффи/золотая пальмовая ветвь/оскар; опыт кормления одной рыбой семь тысяч человек; рак по гороскопу (строго) и эти люди борятся за почëтное звание дома высокой культуры и быта сервиса психологической помощи

😁2🌚1

12 Jan 2026, 12:57 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

РБК дал смешной заголовок. Я тоже так писала сто лет назад

😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @repredlaser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Репендикулярный редакторский лазер-излучатель” (@repredlaser), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repredlaser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.