📺Биткоин идёт на 40к или это ловушка для быков? ▶️https://youtu.be/k1vdwAFa8qo -Алло биткоин?! чё у вас там происходит?! 5,5 гб залил на изи, спасибо 🌲Тайге 😍

Channel
Rep in club
@repinclub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,732subscribers
-561 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001485802327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @repinclub |
| Description | Крипто кошелёк на каждый день: @radexglobalbot Публикации в канале не являются инвестиционной рекомендацией, автор лишь демонстрирует свой опыт Связь - @arepinn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/repinclub |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Nov 2026, 02:09 | 13,732 | -15 |
| 12 Nov 2026, 00:48 | 13,747 | -8 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 13,755 | -8 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:06 | 13,763 | -9 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:49 | 13,772 | -4 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:01 | 13,776 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:31 | 13,785 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 13,790 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:29 | 13,796 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:12 | 13,803 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:01 | 13,808 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 13,817 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 13,825 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:21 | 13,833 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:18 | 13,837 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 13,842 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 13,843 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 13,842 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 13,845 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 13,855 | first reading |
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.0%
- avg views ÷ 13,732 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,920
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (26 May 2026 – 15 November 2026) |
| Views total | 51,890 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 20:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,280
- Videos
- ≈128
- Links
- ≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴Биткоин прогноз: шорт отработал, теперь лонг ▶https://youtu.be/XF9XRCb_eAw 0:00 Биткоин у целей: закрытие шортов 1:38 Новая стратегия: переход в лонг 3:23 Технический взгляд: клин и волатильность 4:29 Обзор эфира, золота и нефти
☀️Radex сегодня исполняется 1 ГОД! 🎆 Именно в этот день ровно год назад проект был опубликован в чатике с элитой. По статистике 9 из 10 стартапов закрываются именно в первый год. Радекс не закрылся! Поздравляю всю команду с этим большим событием😄. Стоит отметить что происходило за последний год в крипто рынке. Ниже список криптопроектов которые прекратили свою деятельность в 2026 году: ▪️Bitmart ▪️BitMEX ▪️AscendEX…
Binance прекращает обработку транзакций, связанных с криптобиржей MEXC (новость). В MEXC пишут, что все ОК и биржа работает в штатном режиме, но часть клиентов: - Не может вывести свои средства! - Переживает, что их личные кошельки попадут в черный список из-за взаимодействия с MEXC и их начнут банить на других криптобиржах кроме бинанс. ▶️Записал видео на эту тему - ▶https://youtu.be/ICj7I9GECyQ 0:00 Риски центр…
Шорт по бтс закрыт, поздравляю с профитом 🚀
▶️Трейдинг на нефти, золото и биткоин: что пошло не так? ▶https://youtu.be/oLTxd0A1DaY 0:00 Анализ нефтяного рынка и смена тренда 1:51 Зарождение нового бычьего цикла по нефти? 3:54 Золото: ложный пробой и ожидания 6:02 Биткоин как последняя надежда 7:44 Анализ S&P 500 и фондовых рынков
лонг нефть / шорт золото ▶️https://youtu.be/pYDH-U18fUc 0:00 Анализ нефти и текущие позиции 1:20 Золото: пробой поддержки и поиск точки входа 2:33 Использование ИИ для прогнозирования рынка 5:56 Биткоин: удержание шорта и прогноз движения
шорт на всю котлету🗑 📺https://youtu.be/dAfuWBGazo4 0:00 Волна хакерских атак и уязвимости 1:09 Анализ биткоина и стратегия шорта 2:19 Торговля нефтью и динамический фандинг 4:52 Риски хранения крипты на кошельках
Мне нравится эта бычка 🙂
Хакер Binance, возможно, только что провернул один из самых умных ходов. -Сначала Tether заморозил 1,5 миллиарда долларов в USDT. -Затем Circle заморозил ещё 800 миллионов в USDC. -На том этапе казалось, что деньги хакера в ловушке. -Но, по-видимому, он уже предусмотрел это. -Вместо того чтобы держать украденный USDT в кошельке, он якобы депонировал его в Aave и использовал как залог, чтобы занять ETH. Затем он про…
📺Binance vs Хакеры: кто победил в битве за $6 млрд? Обзор рынка и сделок ▶️https://youtu.be/SENjFI7kAPg 0:00 Анализ крупнейшего хака в истории крипты 1:27 Разбор текущей торговой сделки и профит 2:30 Почему Monero остается королем анонимности 3:58 Глобальный взгляд на нефтяной рынок Торгую на Dex - ☀️ radex.global 🔗
Криптобиржа KuCoin уходит из России и Беларуси. Пользователям отправят инструкции по выводу средств. Что делать знаете уже… Dex - ☀️ radex.global 🔗 (без разницы с какой вы страны, верификации нет)
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @repinclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@repinclub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 11 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 11 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как давно вы на меня подписаны ?
- 3 недели3%
- 3 месяца4%
- 1 год17%
- 2-3 года46%
- 3-5 лет25%
- Более 5 лет7%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SpreadMaker · 22,756
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
@Arbitrage_Services · 22,855
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 September 2026
@arbitragescanner_eng · 19,544
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rep in club” (@repinclub), 13,732 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repinclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.