Channel
@repetmarketing
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,396subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001519288450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @repetmarketing |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/repetmarketing |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 4,396 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 4,398 | +42 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 4,356 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:46 | 4,362 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 4,384 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 4,391 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 4,407 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 4,417 | -20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 4,437 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 4,448 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 4,467 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:06 | 4,480 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 4,483 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 4,483 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 58.2% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 24.2% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 16.5% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ПОЧЕМУ Я ТАК ЦЕПЛЯЮСЬ К КАЖДОМУ ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЮ НА ПРОВЕРКЕ 😅 За последние годы я видела очень много репетиторов, которые вроде бы уже «учились Авито». Человек приходит ко мне на разбор и говорит: «Я проходила обучение, сделала всё по урокам, оформила профиль, написала текст, запустила объявления - заявок почти нет». Или ещё частая история: «Мне на прошлом курсе проверили объявление и сказали, что всё хорошо. Но я публ…
❤5👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥1
АВГУСТОВСКАЯ ГРУППА «УЧЕНИКИ ИЗ АВИТО» СТАРТОВАЛА! 🌀 Набор в августовский поток официально закрыт: свободных мест больше нет. В этот раз у нас собралась очень сильная команда из 40 репетиторов с самыми разными направлениями. Коллеги преподают английский язык малышам, школьникам и взрослым, предметы начальной школы, готовят детей к школе, работают с русским языком и литературой, математикой и информатикой, химией и …
❤6🔥4👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
ОСТАЛОСЬ 4 МЕСТА в августовскую группу результатов «Ученики из Авито»🌀 〰 Старт 1 группы уже завтра, 4 августа. Вы готовы вместе с нами войти в пик спроса и набрать группы?😎 Тогда читайте внимательно и решайтесь побыстрее, это сообщение для вас🌀 Места в группу результатов «Ученики из Авито» разлетелись просто с бешеной скоростью! У нас собирается очень сильная команда репетиторов🌀 С моей поддержкой вы сможете: 🌀со…
👍2🔥2
Здравствуйте! Евгения, у меня с авито пришла группа первая 🥰 муж и жена после пробного согласились заниматься и сразу перевели мне оплату за 8 занятий 🥹 24000. И сегодня был мой первый урок 3000₽/час! Я по такому ценнику никогда не работала, начинала в 2019 г с 500₽/час. В итоге обучение у вас уже окупилось точно в 2 раза , и самое главное инструменты , клуб и новые идеи постоянно появляются новые.
🔥3
И еще один человек оплатил абонемент , тоже с Авито
❤1
Я даже объявления прикрыла🤣 4 пробника за последнюю неделю , а я в поездке , не успеваю
❤2
⬆️Отзывы Дмитрия: март и август 👍 Ниже ⬇️последняя информация от Валентины
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Коллеги, всем доброго дня! Прекрасных девушек с прошедшим 8 марта!💐❤️💐 И хочу сказать несколько своих ощущений и впечатлений от курса нашей волшебницы Евгении, а то как-то в суете дней все проходит дальше и забывается. Я пришел на курс с очень узкой задачей – продвигать на Авито свой курс по Таблице умножения. Уверенности не было никакой, а сомнений воз и маленькая тележка. У меня был опыт работы с ТГ и ВК, но та…
🥰1
СРАБОТАЕТ ЛИ АВИТО, ЕСЛИ НУЖНО НАБРАТЬ УЧЕНИКОВ НА УЗКОЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЕ ИЛИ КОРОТКИЙ КУРС? Да, да и ещё раз да😊 За время работы с Авито мы продвигали репетиторов по очень разным направлениям. И один из самых интересных примеров - курс Дмитрия Шакина «Таблица умножения за 8 уроков» (ВК: https://vk.ru/umnojailegko). В начале Дмитрий сомневался, есть ли смысл выводить на Авито настолько узкий продукт и сойдётся ли эконо…
🔥5❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @repetmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг репетитора | Евгения” (@repetmarketing), 4,396 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repetmarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.