Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -396. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,581–6,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:55
5,641
-14
11 Sept 2026, 12:54
5,655
-31
6 Sept 2026, 23:40
5,686
-39
2 Sept 2026, 10:46
5,725
-40
30 Aug 2026, 15:18
5,765
-45
27 Aug 2026, 06:43
5,810
-29
24 Aug 2026, 01:28
5,839
-41
20 Aug 2026, 00:18
5,880
-32
17 Aug 2026, 10:14
5,912
-46
13 Aug 2026, 13:49
5,958
-52
10 Aug 2026, 16:05
6,010
-28
7 Aug 2026, 19:31
6,038
+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:01
6,037
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:59
6,037
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
456 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
154
33.8%
❤
100
21.9%
🔥
82
18.0%
🏆
61
13.4%
🤝
18
3.95%
😍
14
3.07%
💯
12
2.63%
🙏
9
1.97%
👍
3
0.658%
🎉
2
0.439%
😱
1
0.219%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @repetitorbezrukova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ребята, на сайте появилась точная дата, когда скидка на курс сгорает.
(14 августа)
Обратите внимание:
При покупке курса по месяцам за вами закрепляется цена на весь учебный год. Подробно объясняла тут 👈
До старта курса осталось совсем чуть-чуть! Уже жду не дождусь начала занятий 🥳❤️
Вижу, что последние несколько дней подписчики прибавляются 🥳
Очень рада всем новеньким и, конечно же, тем, кто и не покидал канал в начале лета ❤️🙏
Сегодня хочу напомнить, что в вашем распоряжении есть волшебная страница со всеми ссылками на мои социальные сети.
Ютуб, Рутуб, Вк, Дзен и даже Яндекс–музыка с аудиоверсиями роликов доступны по одному клику.
Там же есть кнопка для вопросов (личных и не только) и ссылка…
Ольга Эдуардовна, здравствуйте🤝
Если говорить о первой части, то никаких особых «секретов» нет. Здесь решающее значение имеет именно знание теории или везение (шучу)
ОСНОВНЫЕ ОСОБЕННОСТИ (НЮАНСЫ) НАЧИНАЮТСЯ ВО ВТОРОЙ ЧАСТИ:
👉 В задании 19 эксперт прежде всего смотрит, чтобы пример был именно примером.
Хороший пример обычно строится так:
субъект → конкретное действие → результат → вывод, который показывает, что и…
Варвара, добрый день!
Тоже отвечу во всех социальных сетях, потому что вы затронули очень важные вопросы🙏
Если брать годовой курс по месяцам, что будет с ценой? Она будет оставаться первоначальной, по стоимости покупки самого первого месяца или будет расти?
💬 За вами фиксируется цена, по которой вы купили месяц обучения, на весь учебный год.
Например, если вы сейчас приобрели первый месяц за 3850₽, то до конца го…
Вчера в комментарии прилетел вопрос🙄
На самом деле здесь необходимо ответить сразу на два вопроса:
1. Какой федеральный перечень учебников по обществознанию актуален на этот (26/27) учебный год?
💬 Актуальный перечень учебников я подготовила и прикладываю ниже.
2. Что будет с содержанием и форматом ЕГЭ по обществознанию в 2027 году?
💬 Новые государственные учебники по обществознанию под редакцией Д. А. Медведева…
ЕГЭ 2026 позади. Выпускники сейчас занимаются подачей документов и выбором вузов. А я переключаюсь на тех, кому только предстоит пройти этот путь, — на вас! ❤️
Хочу познакомить вас с заданиями прошедшего экзамена. Разберём реальные работы учеников годового курса «Вместе к 100».
👀 Посмотрим:
👉 с какими заданиями ребята справились уверенно и получили максимальные баллы;
👉 где допустили ошибки или почему эксперты придр…
Прилетел такой вопрос в комментарии.
Если тема кому-то интересна и хочется почитать мой ответ, то вам в комментарии к этому посту:
https://t.me/repetitorbezrukova/2673
🤝10❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @repetitorbezrukova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
очки эксперта | егэ налегке обществознание 2027 @egenalegke · 26,387 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Егор Кант ЕГЭ обществознание @histkant · 43,601 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
ПРО100 ЕГЭ История @history_ege · 29,051 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЕГЭ обществознание | Светлана Безрукова” (@repetitorbezrukova), 5,641 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repetitorbezrukova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.