Channel
@repeat_coolschool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
655subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001492106146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @repeat_coolschool |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/repeat_coolschool |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 655 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 658 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 665 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 665 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (21 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 221 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
64 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 26.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💜 Почему многие родители выбирают годовой тариф? Потому что это не только самый выгодный вариант оплаты, но и возможность заранее закрыть вопрос с обучением на весь учебный год. Что вы получаете? ✨ Максимальную выгоду по сравнению с помесячной оплатой. 📅 Фиксированную стоимость обучения до конца учебного года. ✅ Больше никаких ежемесячных платежей — один вопрос закрыт заранее. До 2 августа для действующих ученико…
❤5👍1
😳 ПОСЛЕДНИЙ МЕСЯЦ ЛЕТА... КАК ТАК БЫСТРО? Кажется, только недавно строили планы на лето, а до сентября остался всего один месяц. ⏳ Но это отличная возможность провести его с пользой и начать то, что давно откладывали. Представь: уже этой осенью ты сможешь понимать больше, говорить увереннее и удивляться тому, насколько быстро можно добиться прогресса, если заниматься регулярно. И самое приятное — записавшись сейч…
👍2🔥1
🎋 Сегодня знакомимся с необычным словом из китайской культуры 🌳 木 (mù) — дерево 👡 屐 (jī) — деревянные сандалии (сабо) ✨ Интересный факт: иероглиф 屐 (Сабо) встречается довольно редко. В современной жизни китайцы чаще используют другие слова для обуви, а 屐 (Сабо) можно увидеть в книгах, исторических текстах или когда говорят о традиционной деревянной обуви. 💡 Но именно такие необычные слова помогают лучше понимать к…
❤4
👀 Заметили, какой кнопки не хватает на фото? Это не ошибка — в Китае цифру 4 многие считают не самой удачной. Поэтому в некоторых зданиях после 3-го этажа сразу идёт 5-й, а саму цифру можно не встретить в лифтах, номерах квартир, гостиничных комнатах и даже среди номеров телефонов. 😊 На наших занятиях вы узнаете не только язык, но и множество интересных фактов о жизни и культуре Китая — так учиться становится намно…
🔥4
Выбери правильную комбинацию
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4🔥2👍1🥰1
90% людей путают тоны или значения этих слов, когда видят их вместе. Давай докажем Рипи, что наши подписчики входят в те самые топ-10% умников! 🤓 Посмотри на картинку. Какая комбинация переводов этих иероглифов является абсолютно верной?
❤4
🎫 УЖЕ ПРОШЕЛ МЕСЯЦ ЛЕТА А ТЫ ДО СИХ ПОР СИДИШЬ БЕЗ ЗОЛОТОГО БИЛЕТА? А кто-то продолжает свой путь в китайском — узнаёт новые слова, открывает для себя больше возможностей и становится увереннее с каждым занятием 🇨🇳✨ И самое приятное — за это лето можно получить не только новые знания. Представь: ты занимаешься любимым делом, прокачиваешь китайский и в конце лета получаешь шанс выиграть Айфон, Айпад, колонку Алиса …
👍1
Подписывайтесь: 👉🏼 https://t.me/repeattour
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
✈️Ответы на вопросы по поездке в Китай ❔Как происходит оплата? Мы создали систему поэтапной оплаты. Сначала оплачивается 25% от стоимости -> Покупаем авиабилеты -> Вносите оставшуюся сумму. Есть возможность взять беспроцентную рассрочку от банка на целый год ❔Как оформить визу? Виза не нужна. В Китай для Россиян безвизовый въезд ❔Какой возраст? Берем детей с 8 до 14 лет ❔Нужен ли английский, китайский? Берём дете…
🎉3🔥1
💔Китайцы почти никогда не говорят «я тебя люблю» Есть такая фраза — 我爱你 (wǒ ài nǐ). Формально она означает «я тебя люблю». Но услышать её от китайского папы или бабушки — редкость. Потому что у них есть другая фраза. 你吃了吗？ Nǐ chī le ma? «Ты поел сегодня?» Не слова — а забота. Не признание — а действие. Говорят, когда китаец спрашивает тебя «ты поел?» — он уже давно тебя любит. Просто по-своему. 🥢 А как вы говор…
🔥6❤🔥3❤2
Repeat теперь в мессенджере MAX! 🚀 Подписывайтесь, чтобы: · Не пропускать пользу: полезные карточки, лайфхаки и разборы правил · Учить языки легко: топовые лайфхаки по китайскому 🇨🇳 и английскому 🇬🇧 · Общаться с нами: задавайте вопросы напрямую, без нужды использовать VPN 👉 Подписаться на repeat в max 👈
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @repeat_coolschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбери правильную комбинацию
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 800,137 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REPEAT” (@repeat_coolschool), 655 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repeat_coolschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.