Channel
@repasoenarm2025
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,761subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002054926179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @repasoenarm2025 |
| Description | ✅Preguntas diarias. ✅Fuentes GPC Y NOM ✅Preguntas de ENARMaster ✅Material de estudio |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/repasoenarm2025 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 7,761 | +4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:15 | 7,757 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 7,762 | -9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 7,771 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:27 | 7,779 | -11 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 7,790 | +4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:00 | 7,786 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 7,785 | +6 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 02:42 | 7,779 | -15 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 7,794 | +5 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 7,789 | +15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 7,774 | +8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 7,766 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 7,763 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 7,755 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 7,750 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 7,751 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (6 October 2025 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 25,140 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
252 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 218 | 86.5% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 7.54% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 3.17% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.794% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.397% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.397% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.397% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.397% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.397% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Sé que este año no hice nada con este canal que en algún momento cree para ayudarme a repasar y ayudarlos también a ustedes, fue algo que en su momento me sirvió, y me distraía un poco repasando con ustedes, gracias. 💖
❤3🐳1
Les quiero compartir que después de todo, y aquellos que estuvieron desde el inicio, se logró, nunca dejen de luchar y esforzarse por lo que realmente quieren lograr, no se desanimen si no fue su mejor puntaje este año, el enarm es un examen que no evalúa conocimientos si no resistencia Drs. Pero sobretodo no midan sus logros con los relojes de los demás, cada uno va a su tiempo y al final todo se acomoda como debe s…
❤25
Para los que aún no eligen especialidad, ya llegará su tiempo y de corazón espero que esté su especialidad soñada ✨, recuerden elegir aquello que les apasiona y que les guste, no se vayan a ir por lo que queda solo por “hacer la especialidad”
❤7
Hola Drs buenas tardes a todos, espero que se encuentren súper bien, para los que ya eligieron especialidad y sede, ¡muchas felicidades! 👏🏻🫂 que todo el proceso del registro les vaya bien y no tengan inconvenientes, cada uno sabe el esfuerzo y sacrificio que hizo para lograrlo, ¡enhorabuena! 👏🏻💖💖
❤2
¿Qué día les toca elegir?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Por si la ansiedad les gana, tanto como a mi 🤪🤪
Aquí les dejo un en vivo en tiktok con la actualización de las plazas https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9UXaF4PvsMJ-QCrpw/
Hola hola Drs buenas tardes, ya comenzaron los juegos del hambre y sé que la ansiedad nos sobrepasa, este año si hay posibilidad de elegir plaza y estoy con los nervios de punta 😩😩
File, posted without a caption
❤1
Les envío también los bloques de la categoría de extranjeros
File, posted without a caption
❤5
Hola Drs buenos días a todos, les comparto las plazas totales y las plazas por institución:
🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @repasoenarm2025. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Qué día les toca elegir?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Regresamos a las preguntas diarias?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔¿Les gustaría la idea?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REPASO ENARM 2026 📖🤓” (@repasoenarm2025), 7,761 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repasoenarm2025.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.