Channel
@rendacomcriptomoedas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,278subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001613927457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rendacomcriptomoedas |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rendacomcriptomoedas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 5,278 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 5,280 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,370 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
22 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 90.9% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Você viu o resultado da última pesquisa eleitoral? 🤯 A cada pesquisa, a bolsa pode reagir. As eleições costumam trazer um período de volatilidade MÁXIMA! E é justamente esse movimento que o Sprint Eleitoral pretende aproveitar. 🇧🇷 Em 2018 e 2022, operações indicadas pela Empiricus chegaram a entregar 120%, 375% e até 586% de retorno em poucos dias. Agora, a proposta é buscar oportunidades semelhantes ao longo das …
👍1
🚨 Quase 1 em cada 4 traders nunca fez um curso antes de operar. No mercado financeiro, aprender errando pode sair caro. Por isso, a Empiricus criou o Bootcamp Trader do Milhão: um treinamento 100% gratuito que ensina as melhores práticas de trading e te prepara para a Copa BTG Trader: ➡️ Uma competição em ambiente totalmente simulado que vai premiar o grande campeão com R$ 1 milhão. 👉 Garanta sua vaga: https://em…
👍1
🏆 Todo milionário teve que começar por uma oportunidade. A sua pode ser a Copa BTG Trader. Além da chance de disputar R$ 1 milhão, você poderá contar com a preparação gratuita do Bootcamp Trader do Milhão, conduzido pelo time da Empiricus. Durante a jornada, você terá acesso a estratégias, análises de mercado e orientações para aumentar suas chances na competição. A oportunidade está aberta. Agora, a decisão é su…
❤1👍1
O que você faria com R$ 1 milhão na conta? A Copa BTG Trader está de volta e vai premiar o grande campeão com R$ 1 milhão. E para ajudar você a chegar preparado, a Empiricus criou o Bootcamp Trader do Milhão, um treinamento gratuito com estratégias, análises e acompanhamento ao longo da competição. ✅ Sem custo de inscrição no treinamento ✅ Conteúdo para iniciantes e experientes ✅ Preparação para cada etapa da Copa…
👍1
⏱️ TIC TAC ⏱️ 🚨 Vamos suspender o link de liberação do Protótipo NANO I.A.: Corra para pegar a sua vaga: https://emprc.us/LCjej0
👍1
Muita gente se arrependeu nas últimas duas vezes... 💰 Viram gente ficando milionária com nanocoins e perderam o bonde. Agora, você pode se posicionar de forma antecipada e com a potência da I.A. ➡️ Libere uma das últimas vagas para o Protótipo NANO I.A.: https://emprc.us/13ORHn
👍1
📢 Últimas horas* para entrar no Protótipo NANO I.A. _Estamos muito próximos de atingir 600 usuários_. 🔗 Corra pra não ficar de fora: https://emprc.us/Q7dq0F Assim que esgotarem as vagas, *vamos tirar este link do ar*: https://emprc.us/Q7dq0F
👍1
❗ Assim que atingirmos as *600 vagas*, você não terá mais acesso a NANO. 🔗 Seja rápido e *aproveite o período de testes* para tomar sua decisão com calma: https://emprc.us/p2oneh
👍1
🤔 E quem não tem os R$ 1 mil pra começar logo de cara? Sem problema: a meta do NANO I.A. é a mesma pra todos: multiplicar o capital investido por até 214x 📈. Se você tem só *R$ 500*, por exemplo, pode buscar até R$ 107 mil: 🔗 https://emprc.us/3TXxGX E claro, também pode aumentar seu aporte ao longo do projeto, quando os resultados se consolidarem. 🔒 Mas pra isso, precisa liberar seu acesso o quanto antes: https:/…
👍1
❗ Você pode estar cometendo um GRAVE ERRO As vagas para o Protótipo NANO I.A. estão perto de esgotar: 👉 https://emprc.us/xKo85N Quando isso acontecer, você não terá mais a opção de testar e ver os resultados do NANO por 7 dias sem compromisso. Mas ao travar a vaga no seu nome ainda hoje, você tem uma semana pra decidir com calma. Não faz sentido perde essa chance. 🔗 Clica no link pra liberar: https://emprc.us/xK…
👍1
Quem entrou com R$ 1.000, teria ganhado R$ 876 em dois dias! 🚀 É isso que o Protótipo NANO I.A. foi capaz de fazer antes mesmo do fundo de bear market. Imagina a partir de agora? 👉 Pegue seu acesso antes que esgote: https://emprc.us/ixOjKt Retornos passados não são garantia de ganhos futuros. Investimentos têm riscos e podem trazer perdas ao investidor.
👍1
Já pensou morrer com R$ 1.000 na mão? 💰 Enquanto outras pessoas puderam levar quase R$ 2 milhões? Essa foi a sensação de quem perdeu as ondas anteriores das nanocoins. 🔗 Não perca a sua chance: https://emprc.us/Gtjq7J Retornos passados não são garantia de ganhos futuros. Investimentos têm riscos e podem trazer perdas ao investidor.
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rendacomcriptomoedas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,258,700 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Empiricus Cripto” (@rendacomcriptomoedas), 5,278 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rendacomcriptomoedas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.