Channel
@rencinails
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,098subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001606673342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rencinails |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rencinails |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 1,098 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 1,100 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 1,100 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 43.1% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 24.6% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 9.23% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 9.23% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 7.69% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.54% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 21 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ОБЗОР ФРЕЗЫ от Tint to Tint 📦 На днях получила новую посылку, наконец-то до меня дошли нашумевшие фрезы с красной насечкой от Tint to Tint ➖Первым делом опробовала фрезу, стружка от нее летит крупная, мой пылесос не справляется 😁 ➕Но я, наконец-то, смогла отказаться от опила поверхности пилкой перед покрытием! Так как она максимально выглаживает поверхность от и до! А что приятно удивило, носик у нее реально рабо…
В тиктоке даже ждали, что я начну выдавливать гной с этих ноготков 🤡 Но, на самом деле, слава богу, что ко мне уже пришли зажившие ручки, осталась только облезшая сухая кожа и ничего более 🙏 Потому что гной, это не про мастера, а про подолога ❌ Лучше никогда не доводить до такого состояния!
🤩2
РАЗБИРАЕМ СЛУЧАЙ 🆘 Ну что, давайте разбираться, что же произошло с маникюром нашей новой клиентки выше ☝🏻 На первый взгляд вариантов очень много! Но причина самая банальная и лежит на поверхности 💁🏼♀️ ‼️ Скрученная ногтевая пластина и ярко выраженные боковые валики ‼️ Клиентка жалуется на постоянные отслойки материала с торца и углов 🆘 Но в салоне, куда ходила клиентка, мастера до сих пор работают в старой техн…
❤7❤🔥1🔥1
Давайте сегодня разберем интересный случай! 🆘 Что видите? Пишите в комментариях 👇
👍2
РОЗЫГРЫШ 🥳 Условия участия просты: 1️⃣Быть подписанным на каналы: @naxodki_mastera @rencinails 2️⃣Нажать ниже кнопку "Участвую" ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ И ждать результатов! А можно поделится постом с подругами мастерами Разыграем NAIL BOX с трендовыми материалами от Your NAME. В нем 2 гель-лака и сухое масло 💎 🚗 доставка приза по РФ за наш счет. Итоги подведем 29 НОЯБРЯ в 15:00 по МСК!
❤1👍1
РЕКОМЕНДАСЬОН 🔥 И конечно не могу вас оставить без рекомендации! В инстаграм я уже рассказывала о том, что тестирую гели от бренда TINT TO TINT Как итог, я влюбилась в эти гели, так как САМЫЙ ОГРОМНЫЙ ИХ ПЛЮС я рассказала в видео ✅ Купить можно тут
❤5
Пока я немного выпала из телеграмма, ловите шикарный осенний маникюр 🍂 Я задействована во многих грандиозных проектах, поэтому скоро все станет известно 🔥
🤩4
Друзья, у нас тут ДОЛГОЖДАННАЯ НОВИНКА от бренда ONLYNAILS 🔥 Все вы знаете, что я очень люблю гели, особенно жидкие, от этого бренда 💔 Чем они мне так нравятся?👇🏼 ✅ Пластичные, что отлично подходит для тонких и поврежденных ногтей (Когда как жесткие гели дают отслойки) ✅ Жидкие как база, отлично подходят для скоростной коррекции НО! ВЫШЛА НОВИНКА! 🔥🔥🔥 Теперь прочнее в несколько раз! Но все такой же жидкий! ✅ Т…
🔥4❤1
ЗАЧЕМ НУЖНА ПОДЛОЖКА? Подложка - тонкий слой базы под любой вид укрепления/выравнивания ✅ ФУНКЦИИ ПОДЛОЖКИ 👇🏼 1️⃣ Адгезия Кислота в составе баз разрыхляет структуру ногтя, что позволяет компонентам базы проникать глубже и создавать адгезионный слой. 2️⃣ Амортизация Между мягким подвижным ногтем и жестким материалом всегда нужна амортизационная подушка. Пластичная база отлично выполняет эту роль. 3️⃣ Защита Тонки…
🔥8👍2
Или участвуйте в опросе ✅
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Привет, мои дорогие! 🔥 Сегодня хочу пообщаться с вами и узнать, какую тему будем обсуждать в ближайшее время, есть у вас пожелания и предпочтения?) Пишите ниже в комментариях свои пожелания 👇🏼
👍1
Подкаст: КАК И ГДЕ ИСПОЛЬЗОВАТЬ КИСЛОТНЫЙ ПРАЙМЕР ✅
🔥6🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rencinails. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Или участвуйте в опросе ✅
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2024 to 21 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rencinails named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Евгения Ренцис | @renci.nails” (@rencinails), 1,098 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rencinails.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.