Voice message, posted without a caption
🙏35🔥16❤10💯4🏆3👍3🎉2👏1

Channel
@renatocardosooficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,088subscribers
-227 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001866020513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @renatocardosooficial |
| Description | Inteligência para sua vida linktr.ee/i27 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/renatocardosooficial |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 46,088 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 46,101 | +17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 46,084 | -20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 46,104 | +5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 46,099 | +40 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 46,059 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 46,076 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 46,095 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:45 | 46,104 | -30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 46,134 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 46,151 | -20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 46,171 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 46,174 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 46,182 | +7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 46,175 | +11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 46,164 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 46,172 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 46,192 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 46,217 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 46,224 | first reading |
142 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 142 (29 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 708,530 |
| Reactions total | 14,152 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 17:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 90 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27,762 reactions across 142 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13,718 | 49.4% | |
| 🙏 | 6,927 | 25.0% | |
| ❤ | 4,778 | 17.2% | |
| 🕊 | 506 | 1.82% | |
| 👍 | 487 | 1.75% | |
| 👏 | 414 | 1.49% | |
| 💯 | 202 | 0.728% | |
| 🏆 | 151 | 0.544% | |
| 😁 | 142 | 0.511% | |
| ⚡ | 87 | 0.313% | |
| 👌 | 87 | 0.313% | |
| 🤣 | 66 | 0.238% | |
| 🥰 | 65 | 0.234% | |
| 🤩 | 56 | 0.202% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 0.115% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 0.047% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 0.043% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 0.029% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.018% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 0.014% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.007% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,762 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| adecomDeus | 1 | 25 August 2026 | 25 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Voice message, posted without a caption
🙏35🔥16❤10💯4🏆3👍3🎉2👏1
TAREFA DE CASA: traga hoje na Terapia do Amor ☝🏼 (exemplo) — escreva os sobrenomes de sua família
🔥23❤11👍5🙏3👏1
ROTINA É UMA COISA BOA ⏱️ | #shorts #renatocardoso . . . ▶️ https://youtube.com/shorts/7UneMcT-Sqg
🙏34🔥19🥰4👏2👍1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥180🙏47❤30👍5👏4🎉2🕊2
MINHA VIDA ESTÁ UMA ROTINA: COMO LIDAR COM O TÉDIO? Você sente que sua vida está sempre igual? Que os dias passam, mas nada muda? A rotina ganhou fama de vilã, mas existe uma razão para ela fazer parte da nossa vida. E, em muitos casos, o que parece tédio esconde um problema muito mais profundo. Neste vídeo, você vai entender por que tentar mudar o cenário nem sempre muda a realidade, e onde realmente vale a pena …
❤46🔥35🙏29👏3🕊3👍1
VOCÊ TEM CERTEZA? 🤔 | #shorts #renatocardoso . . . ▶️https://youtube.com/shorts/TbosGrynePs?is=5A_mnQ8vhEa9QohH
🔥90🙏23❤11👍6🕊5
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥149🙏34❤8👍5👏4
SINCERAMENTE ERRADO 😬 | #1586 O mais perigoso não é estar errado. É ter certeza de que está certo, mesmo quando está absolutamente equivocado. Uma crença, um comportamento ou uma maneira de pensar podem parecer corretos aos seus próprios olhos, até que os resultados mostrem o contrário. Neste vídeo, você vai entender como identificar um ponto cego antes que ele custe seu casamento, sua família, seus relacionamento…
🔥98🙏30❤17💯4🕊4👏2👍1
ORAÇÃO PARA QUEM ESTÁ COM DEPRESSÃO 🙏🏼 Se você está triste, com uma angústia que parece não ter fim, enfrentando dias cinzentos por causa da depressão, aflito ou passando por uma situação que parece impossível de superar, esta oração é para você. Una-se a nós nesta oração. E, se você conhece alguém que está passando por isso, envie esta mensagem para ela.🙏 📌 Se este vídeo lhe ajudou, compartilhe para ajudar mais p…
🔥59🙏30❤26🕊3👍2👏2
INVISTA NISSO 🧠| #shorts #renatocardoso . . . ▶️ https://youtube.com/shorts/nhqAYP5jZhg?si=rpzxIKR7IscsCd0v
🙏68🔥32❤9⚡4🕊4👍1
NENHUMA FACULDADE TE ENSINA ISTO 🎓| #1585 Qual é o maior diferencial do ser humano? Não são as suas posses, nem seus diplomas e currículos exemplares. Há um diferencial que todos têm, mas nem todos usufruem dele e, infelizmente, o entregam a outras pessoas. Neste vídeo, vamos entender por que algumas pessoas acertam tanto em todas as áreas da vida, enquanto outras vivem correndo atrás do prejuízo. 📌 Se este vídeo …
🔥86🙏49❤14🏆4🕊4👏3👌2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥179🙏53💯11❤8👍8👏8🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @renatocardosooficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Renato Cardoso Oficial” (@renatocardosooficial), 46,088 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renatocardosooficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.