Posted without readable text
👍3❤2🔥1😎1

Channel
@ren_bank
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
10,417subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001578977483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ren_bank |
| Description | Официальный канал банка. Регистрация в реестре РКН https://clck.ru/3LdnSf |
| Created | 27 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ren_bank |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 10,417 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 10,421 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 10,426 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 10,427 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 10,428 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 10,425 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 10,433 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 10,432 | +6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 10,426 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 10,429 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 10,432 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:14 | 10,431 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 10,429 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 10,431 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 10,432 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 10,435 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 10,440 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:50 | 10,445 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 10,445 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (25 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,163 |
| Reactions total | 291 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
501 reactions across 32 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 29.1% | |
| 👍 | 137 | 27.3% | |
| 🔥 | 87 | 17.4% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 6.19% | |
| 😎 | 28 | 5.59% | |
| ⚡ | 19 | 3.79% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 2.99% | |
| 🕊 | 13 | 2.59% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 2.00% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 1.60% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 0.998% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.399% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 513reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ren_bank. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
👍3❤2🔥1😎1
Устроим небольшую перекличку? 🎠 Оказывается, все мы по-разному относимся к наличным. ➡️ Одни никогда не выходят из дома без наличных. Таких по статистике 38%. Для них купюры в кошельке — это уверенность и контроль над тратами. ➡️ У других общение с наличными может вызывать дискомфорт или даже страх. ➡️ 10% просто подзабыли, каково это — держать в руках бумажные деньги. Им достаточно карт и телефона. Для этой кате…
❤17👍8🔥4😱2
Posted without readable text
👍4🤩3❤2🕊2😱1
Правильный ответ: Сколько бы отделений вы ни выбрали, все вклады суммируются. Банк — это одно юрлицо, лимит страхования один: 1 400 000 ₽ на одного человека в одном банке.
👍6👏3❤2🔥1
А вот это интересно 👍 Представьте: вы открыли вклады в трёх разных отделениях нашего банка, например, по 600 000 ₽ в каждом. Итого 1 800 000 ₽. Вы знаете, что вклады застрахованы. Но вот вопрос: если вкладов три, то страховка тоже утраивается? Отмечайте свой вариант, а мы дадим ответ далее 👇 @ren_bank 4️⃣ в МАХ
❤3👍3👏2😎1
Забрать нельзя оставить 🚫 Где поставить запятую? Чужую забытую карту в банкомате брать не стоит, даже из добрых побуждений. Её могли специально оставить мошенники. Как только возьмёте карту, появится «владелец» со свидетелями и обвинит вас в краже. Дальше — давление и требование «решить вопрос на месте», то есть заплатить. Всё срежиссировано. Что делать, если увидели чужую карту 🤗 ⏺ Не трогайте, воспользуйтесь д…
👍6⚡3❤3🔥2
Posted without readable text
❤4👍3😎3🎉1🔥1
🥹 Сколько карт нужно на самом деле? Одной мало! Потерялась, заблокировали, «съел» банкомат — и вы без денег. Десять уже перебор 🎠 На наш взгляд, хватит двух. 1️⃣ Дебетовая «Главная МИР» — для повседневных трат с кешбэком 1,5% за все покупки. 1️⃣ Кредитка «115 дней без %» как умная подстраховка для нужных покупок и спонтанного шопинга. Снимайте наличные бесплатно и тратьте в удовольствие. Идеальное комбо, чтобы уп…
❤5👍2👏2🔥2🕊1🤩1
🤔 Устроим финансовый блиц? Три небанальных вопроса о подушке безопасности. 1️⃣ В какой валюте хранить? В той, в которой больше тратите. 2️⃣ Стоит ли её инвестировать? Нет. Подушка — это деньги на случай форс-мажора, который может случиться в любой момент. 3️⃣ Должна ли подушка всегда быть под рукой? Необязательно, но доступ должен быть быстрым. Идеальный вариант — это накопительный счёт: деньги не смешиваются …
❤9👍4🔥3👏2🏆1
🛡 Как не потерять доступ к нашим продуктам? Установить сертификаты Минцифры! Без лишних технических деталей: сертификат — это файл, который помогает браузеру понять, что вы попали на наш настоящий сайт или мобильное приложение и соединение с ними защищено. Сам сертификат — это не пароль и не ключ от счёта, он не даёт доступ к вашим деньгам или телефону. Это «пропуск доверия» между вашим браузером и нашими онлайн-се…
👍6😎4❤3
Ловим тёплые летние деньки, а не проблемы ⚠️ Представьте, что вы гуляете в парке или отдыхаете на веранде кафе. А вот и аккуратная наклейка с надписью «Бесплатный Wi-Fi», ниже QR-код. Вроде ничего подозрительного. Но это не забота о вас, а фишинговый сайт для кражи данных вашей карты. Как не попасться: ⏺ QR-коды с уличных наклеек лучше не сканировать. ⏺ Нужен Wi-Fi — просто спросите пароль у персонала. ⏺ Заметили …
👍7❤5🔥4👏2
Не проблема, если деньги распределить до того, как они разойдутся сами 🗄 Например, 100 тысяч по формуле 50/25/25. ➡️ 50 000 ₽ — повседневные траты: ЖКХ, еда, транспорт, бытовые покупки. ➡️ 25 000 ₽ — непредвиденные расходы: лечение, ремонт, поломка техники. Можно отправить на «РенКопилку+» с возможностью снятия в любой момент. ➡️ 25 000 ₽ — цель: отпуск, ремонт, крупная покупка. На вкладе «Ренессанс Специальный», д…
👍8❤4🔥4🕊3🏆1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @ren_bank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ответ на задачу:
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всего ячеек в ряду:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,308,737 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Renaissance Credit |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian banking institution |
| X / Twitter | @ren_credit |
| Official site | https://rencredit.ru/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ренессанс Банк” (@ren_bank), 10,417 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ren_bank.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.